User:Horus Kol/Talk Archive 01-02-07
I'm going to put Scouting up for FAC soon. If you want to do those edits on Brownies or whatever it was, please start. Let me know if you have concerns. Rlevse 11:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Let me know when you've done this. WIm's done a nice job tweaking the article too, but I'd really like your edits on it before I FAC it. Then the fireworks begin-;) Rlevse 19:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
I took a shot at cleaning this up. Thoughts? Rlevse 20:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Can you create a quick stub to get rid of that Scoutlink (UK) (which I know nothing about) red link in Scouting? It may be a problem with the FAC. Thanks. Rlevse 00:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I had forgot about it. Much of my experience back in the 1960s was with Senior Scouts/Venture Scouts or Rover Scouts. I know little about what Explorer Scouts are doing now on the ground in UK, but I get the impression from the article that it is a pretty sensible and usefull program. That is a plus for the article. BTW, I like the photo of Stanage. That was one of my stomping grounds in my youth and in September I climbed up to Stanage Pole from Hathersage with my 30/20 year old year old daugher and son who live now in London and tried to explain what it was all about, but I digress. I think it is a good article. I suggest you put it to peer review. I'll be happy to discuss the comments from the review with you. Sorry I can not be more helpfull. --Bduke 11:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Scout unit structure
[edit]Horus, I'd like to learn more of unit structure in Britain. I've never been totally sure I understand it. In the BSA, there is the national hq, then councils. Councils will have several districts. The district is the lowest level that has paid professionals, one per district that works out of the council hq. Under the districts will be the individual units: Cub packs, Scout troops, Venture crews, Explorer posts, Varsity teams, etc. Councils don't usually have regular volunteers unless someone just wants to help. Districts will have some volunteers. The units are all volunteers. How does this correlate to The Scout Association, such as what you call Sections and Groups, etc? What are the equivalents of Section and Group? Rlevse 11:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it helps much. So an Area/County is like a council, districts are the same. The Group is where it's different. We really don't have something like a Group. The closest would be a single church or whatever that sponosors Cubs, Scouts, Venturers that all have the same Chartered Organization Representative and that is the only common connection. The COR is a volunteer, not paid. Most sponsoring organizations do not have all types of units. Each unit is a separate entity, they just happen to have a common COR and sponsoring organization.Rlevse 12:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Highly interesting, your TSA is much like our GSUSA and our BSA is much like your GG.Rlevse 14:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Scout Sections template
[edit]I really like the scout sections template, do you think fellowship should be added? Jt spratt 13:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
I've done some work on this lately. Can you look at the UK parts of it for improvement? I'd like to go for GA soon. I'll be adding too. It definitely needs more wikilinks and refs.Rlevse 20:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Bduke helped with the refs, but I'd still like one for the para on the 5 years needed to get the UK Wood Badge if you have one. Thanks again. I'm going ahead and listing for GA as it takes ahwile to get a reviewer.Rlevse 03:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- HI! Glad you're still around. If we can't find a ref within a short time, no more than a week, we should look at rewording that part as by then we'll be getting close to where someone will review it for GA.Rlevse 20:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Your reference to gaining the Wood Badge in three years talks of "appropriate training". In the old days that meant a Preliminary Training Course, not the full Wood Badge. Are you sure it now means the Wood Badge? Ask your District Training guy - Traning Advisor> - it used to be ADC (Training) - I was one. --Bduke 21:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK, so why does'nt POR say it is Wood Badge? Do the 20 modules include the week (or 4 weekends) at camp? In the old days, lots of good leaders never got Wood Badge. What does the SA do about leaders who fail to get it in 3 years. Surely not throw them out given the shortage of leaders? --Bduke 23:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
How is Humshaugh being first different from Brownsea Island? It's not clear to me. See also Eric_Sherbrooke_Walker, which I just found and tagged. How are refs for Wood Badge coming? Rlevse 23:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think you're right, the guy changed the article to read 2nd camp.Rlevse 20:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
|
On February 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Humshaugh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Scout-wj1929.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Scout-wj1929.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 00:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)