User:HitroMilanese/Archive19
.gif){kind=small}
Draft: Simployer[edit]Regarding the declined submission of this article. The Norwegian version has 14 references, of which only one is to the company page. The reason why my English suggestion had 5 company links and 5 external links, was that most of the references is in Norwegian, while the company has a English domain. Would it be better to actually translate more of the Norwegian article and add more links, even if they are not references to English content? The references in the Norwegian article is mostly major news pages as the employees in the company are often interviewed by media. --Magnus Schaft (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Question re: notability/references[edit]Hello! You declined my article on Dollar Pickle records on the grounds of it not being notable enough/lacking sufficient media coverage. There is a article for Rusted Rail whom I would argue is of a similar caliber to Dollar Pickle, and based on the references in the article, has received even less media coverage than them. The source I have added does a deep dive into the label and discusses it at a length. Please let me know what you think. Hvala ;) Savetheinternets (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Intelligence Node Wikipedia Page[edit]Hi, This is with respect to Intelligence Node draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Intelligence_Node being declined by you yesterday. You have asked to mention why this company is notable. I would like to bring to your attention that we have followed all notability guidelines issued by wikipedia. The information mentioned can be verified from reliable sources such as The Economic Times ( which as per wikipedia itself, "As of 2012, it is the world's second-most widely read English-language business newspaper, after The Wall Street Journal") & TechCrunch ( according to wikipedia "TechCrunch is an American online newspaper focusing on high tech and startup companies.") and have several other reliable sources. We believe we have followed all notability rules of wikipedia. I would request you to review it again and share your feedback. TullikaInode1 (talk) 18:50, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Mike Gettis[edit]Hi. 2 months ago you declined this draft. You asked to add additional references in independent and reliable sources. I have scrubbed the promotional statements and have added reliable external news sources from various independent websites. The sources that I have added show significant coverage about Gettis. I request you to review it and leave your feedback. I also want to inform you that I have followed the COI guideline on my user page. Thanks.
Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Jones (Alabama politician)[edit]
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Draft Sándor Belák - reply to your review and rejection[edit]Dear HitroMilanese, many thanks for reviewing the Draft:Sándor_Belák article created by myself. Your comments are valuable and I am considering them. However, you wrote that "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified." Let me note that all references are to peer-reviewed scientific articles, which of course can be verified... this is the basis of any scientific publication all over the world. No scientific scripts can be published without verification and who else can do the verification better than the author's peers... so in this case I am respectfully objecting your criticism. Having said that, I understand that Wikipedia is not a scientific organ and I will rewrite the article and will refer to independent reliable sources according to Wikipedia rules. I also looked at some other notable scientists of Hungarian origin English Wikipedia articles, like Mihaly_Csikszentmihalyi or George Klein (biologist) for further reference. Thanks again for considering this article, I will submit a new, improved version soon. With kind regards --Fmasszi (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks again and kind regards from --Fmasszi (talk) 10:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Kind regards, --Fmasszi (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
With kind regards --Fmasszi (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Draft: BioFoodLab[edit]Hi Hitro! I have rewritten the text to sound more encyclopedic. I have also added sources. The Russian sources quoted (Kommersant, Vedomosti) are all major feature stories in leading business media. (These are not pay-for-play sources.) I have also included features from CNN and Entrepreneur (in-house correspondents), as well as Forbes (although the author was a contributor). This company does in fact happen to be the biggest in the healthy snacks segment in Russia, so I think it is worthy of an article. If you google the company's name, you will see it has just under 100,000 mentions. If you think my edit still needs work, please let me know. I have no relation to the company except for eating its products. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohannesburgBlues (talk • contribs) 15:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Draft:Dragvanti[edit]Hey, I noticed you said that if this was written better, it was notable. Tried my hand. See if this is any better. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello HitroMilanese, I have added a few more things to my Draft, Workiz. Could you please review them and see if it has become notable? It has references from leading industry magazine and leading Jerusalem publications, such as the well-known "TheMarker", which is part of the HaAretz network - a publicaiton in the list you shared with me that is highly regarded. Thank you!
Why you removed the name ?[edit]Hi HitroMilanese why you removed the name of Amarpreet singh from Khalsa aid page ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovedeepsingh (talk • contribs) 08:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
I am not sock[edit]Hello ,today I saw your message on my talk page .I created an article by my own .You approved then again make it draft . Someone saying am sock!!What the hell.What is that itsyourimran?I don't even know him.And what proof do you need to proof me right?I wish you will move my article to article page again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iqbal_Hossain_(Cricketer)
Three References Review[edit]Hello HitroMilanese, Please review my request here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Workiz I have put the three references I think are the best. Avivdc (talk) 21:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Articles for creation: Orson Rehearsed (February 14)[edit]Four reviews from international magazines have been added. More are forthcoming, as the film has only been recently released. Additionally, the composer has nearly a dozen other operas listed on Wikipedia -- this is one of them. Perhaps the cross-listing is somehow confusing? This is a "opera film," which means it functions both as a live, staged opera, and as a film. Hence the submission.
Draft: My Beautiful Laundrette (EP)[edit]hi Hitro, so how can I get more additional resources, the EP is practically new and there aren't so many link resources
Draft:Paulita Pappel[edit]Hello hitro - i edited many reliable sources from German and Spanish news weblinks. Information can be verified with help of these weblinks. All weblinks are from reliable German Spanish and English websites such as THe Times, GQ, Express, Bild, Die Welt and many others. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TallyAngel (talk • contribs) 11:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Draft: Faizan Arif[edit]Hi. a few days back you declined this draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Faizan_Arif). You asked to cite your sources using footnotes. I have completely done that. The sources that I have added show significant coverage about Faizan Arif. I request you to review it and leave your feedback and plese check if further correction is needed. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weatherforyou (talk • contribs) 06:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive[edit] Hello HitroMilanese: WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive! Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list. Lead Section[edit]Hi, Can you give more specific details of how I can improve on the lead section of article summary that I currently have? What are things that need to be changed? Article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ship_Brooklyn_Saints ) OaklandTempleHill (talk) 23:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Isabel Ochone on Jerrold Mundis[edit]Hi. Thanks so much for getting to my draft page on Draft:Jerrold Mundis. (https://thereaderwiki.com/en/Draft:Jerrold_Mundis) I understand your criticisms but I was wondering if we might discuss them a bit so I can understand how to improve the page. The two complaints you seem to have is that 1--that the subject is not notable and 2--that the cited sources are by the subject himself. I believe the subject is very notable. As an author, his work was reviewed and mentioned by the New York Times for decades, the paper of record and he was interviewed on Fresh air with Terry Gross, a radio program on NPR that is celebrated as one of this country's most dependable sources of information. Also Mundis's books were featured on the Book of the Month Club which is not exactly an award but that position is reserved for only the most important authors. How can you not find such a person worthy of a Wikipedia article? Or can you tell me how my article fails to meet the test? As for the sources, please note the main source is a Finding Aid Bowling Green University Libraries, an objective source. As for the articles on debt, history, and on other topics, I included them as they are to show that Mundis wrote in some of the most important venues that exist, i.e. The New York Times, including the New York Times Book Review, and he appeared in print by American Heritage Publishers Weekly article featured, for example, to give an example of his writing. He also has hundreds of listings in World Cat. which are cited. Did I do that correctly? Can you please tell me what I might do to make this article publishable please? I also just added a recent article in a newsletter citing that Mundis helped thousands of people who mourn his loss. If there were to be a Wikipedia article, these numbers would only grow but a place to read about Mundis is needed. His own website has been closed down and no references to it were included. Please note that when living, Mundis had to adhere to the difficult position of being a humble man who respects the 12 Step credo of anonymity. Now that he is deceased, I am sure more people would be willing to cite his contributions as an expert in his field and as an author, but a place to read about him and collect information about him is needed. Thanks. Isabel
Dear Hitro,
can you check the article Draft:Jerrold Mundis now and see if it is any better? The sources are a little different, hopefully easier and the notability is established. Mundis has written dozens of books. Have I used the World Cat information correctly to establish his notability? Thanks, Isabel Hi can you help me on the artical[edit]hi can you help me to create this wiki page hi please help me[edit]hi can you help me on this wiki page Suryansh Singer[edit]Nice work spotting this. I just moved it back to Draft:Suryansh Singer as it has no place as an article yet. The user who moved it out of draft only had about 20 edits to his name so IMHO wasn't qualified to do it. I have left the CSD in place. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC) Also - see this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editorinchieff --10mmsocket (talk) 10:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Garry Khatrao[edit]I have only provided information about last article, How can i approve that. that information is real and related to artist of article.
OK thanks @Hitro I am editor to the page of this Artist and also will be of more pages through my username, is it possible to make more than 1 page from my account ? and will it published from their own account ?
Pigcasso page[edit]Dear HitroMilanese, Thank you for the feedback on the Pigcasso page — much appreciated. Could you help me to declare a COI, as you suggested? I'm quite new to making edits and creating pages on Wikipedia and I'm not exactly sure how best to do this by myself. Warm regards, Joanne Joanne Lefson (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey Hi[edit]Hey Hi mate.. I just got update that my article has been declined by you. I was working on its editorial. can you please tell me the exact reason of decliening my article.
Sanderson Jones draft[edit]Hello Hitro, Thank you for reviewing Sanderson Jones draft. I really appreciate it, it was waiting review for over 3 months. Can you help me in moving the page from Sanderson Jones (comedian) to just Sanderson Jones. I tried but I am not able to do so. Best Regards
Pigcasso/Oscar[edit]Dear HitroMilanese, Thank you so much for your assistance with the Pigcasso page. I have now added the code declaring a potential COI on my userpage (both for Pigcasso and Oscar, as was recommended by TheBirdsShedTears). Now that this has been amended, are you able to help me get the Oscar page published? I have tried to contact TheBirdsShedTears but it appears they have taken a mini break. Many thanks again, Joanne. Joanne Lefson (talk) 17:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Draft:Slime and Putty Co[edit]Hi, you deleted my page Draft:Slime and Putty Co due to it sounding like an advertisement. How can I access it again so that I can alter it. Thanks.Davedoanldson (talk) 02:11, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Draft European School of Oncology[edit]Just to let you know I'm resubmitting this draft article on the European School of Oncology. I've done substantial editing of language and some content which I think should address the issues you raised. Thanks for taking another look
|
