User:GyongminM/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes. In the controversy section, though it is mentioned in lead section, there is no mention about Kim being innocent of any relationship with Burning Sun incident.
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think the last paragraph is a bit overly detailed. I think it should be typed in the controversy section

Is the article neutral? Yes.
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No.
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes.
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes.
Are the sources current? Yes. Feb 2020 sources exist.
Check a few links. Do they work? Yes. works well

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes.
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Enhance... well, yes.
Are images well-captioned? Yes.
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes.
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Yes.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There is only one other talk, talking about using of the word despite is not appropriate.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C-Class on Biography and Popmusic project.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? I don't know about the difference but I found that talk activation can be really differ depending on the article.

What is the article's overall status? Good.
What are the article's strengths?
How can the article be improved?
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well developed.

Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~