Jump to content

User talk:Gogolplex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Gogolplex)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Gogolplex! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

You've Got Email!

[edit]
Hello, Gogolplex. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaghnobi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tajik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian languages‎

[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Siberian languages‎ have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
  • Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Halay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice regarding Coronavirus disease 2019

[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute at Coronavirus disease 2019

[edit]

Hi Gogolplex,

the page Coronavirus disease 2019 has been protected to prevent further edit warring on a semi-protected page, between users whose experience should be high enough not to engage in such behavior. Please be more careful when the protection expires.

Thanks and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, I do not think that I had edit warred. There haven't happened a constant override or a vioalation of 3 revert rule, at least by myself.--Gogolplex (talk) 07:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. There was an edit war and you had been reverting the same user and the same edit twice. Not all edit wars are done by just two participants, but I'd say you have pretty clearly been one of them. While not mandatory, WP:BRD explains a better approach. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ToBeFree, I had reverted first time as there were to be no consensus on the talk page and other user decided to act bold. I had reverted it again, after I've added supplementary information to discussion on the talk page. After that another user reverted my second reversion without adding any supplemental arguments on the talk page. I have not reverted him/her and asked him to present arguments at the talk page. This is not a BRD violation (which is just a non-policy, supplementary page for WP:Consensus as it claims, which discourages users to do major changes without consensus)

Apart from all of these reasons, my total number of reverts were only 2, and WP:EW clearly states that 3 revert rule should be violated for edit warring. It is unfair and plain wrong to impute me as an edit warrer... --Gogolplex (talk) 14:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just like my protection, which I undid due to justified concerns, making two reverts on that page is a risky and probably bad idea. The three-revert rule is a bright line for quick blocking, but edit warring is not limited to violations of the three revert rule – especially not if more than two editors join the reverting. Imagine ten users doing one revert each: that's edit warring too. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

For your contributions on en.wiki and Wikipedias in other languages.

Puduḫepa 05:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Middle Persian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mithridates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaduz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqueduct.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Altai people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haplogroup Q.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Tuz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kulu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting some article expansion help

[edit]

Greetings,

It seems you are likely to have some interest in linguistics related topics. Requesting you to visit Contemporary and historical linguistics related article Draft:Aurats (word) and help expand, if you find topic interested in.

Thanks & warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 12:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abortion survivor for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abortion survivor, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abortion survivor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Istanbul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Science High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogolplex&oldid=1258290408"