User:Ginnybarnes/Spacecraft cemetery
This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Lead [All]
[edit]The spacecraft cemetery, known more formally as the South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area, is a region in the southern Pacific Ocean east of New Zealand, where spacecraft that have reached the end of their usefulness. The area is roughly centered on "Point Nemo" or the oceanic pole of inaccessibility The defunct space station Mir and six Salyut stations are among those that have been deposited there. Other spacecraft that have been routinely deposited in the region include various cargo spacecraft to the International Space Station, including Russian Progress cargo craft, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency H-II Transfer Vehicle, and the European Space Agency's Automated Transfer Vehicle. A total of more than 263 spacecraft were disposed in this area between 1971 and 2016. The International Space Station is slated for retirement to the spacecraft cemetery in 2024.
Current considerations of the Spacecraft cemetery include the environmental impact it creates on marine life within the South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Region[1]. This region is beyond legal jurisdiction of any countries and therefore faces less regulation[1]. Currently two treaties outline certain laws that can be applied to the spacecraft cemetery. The Outer Space Treaty produced by the United Nations reflects on damages caused by spacecraft on opposing nations[2]. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea reflects on general marine pollution[3]. Marine pollution can be caused by spacecraft deposit into the cemetery due to the spillage of a highly toxic rocket propellant called Hydrazine[1]. Other forms of space debris removal are being considered and produced in order to slow the exponential growth of space debris orbiting earth due to the increased amount of space exploration[1][4].
Purpose [Ginny]
[edit]Earth's spacecraft cemetery is used as a site for spacecraft that have reached their lifetime limit due to fatigue and must be retired.[5] Larger spacecraft too massive to burn up during re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere are controlled to land in Earth’s spacecraft cemetery, a location in the ocean remote from inhabited regions.[5] The use of this remote location ensures protection of inhabited regions from harm during re-entry and impact.[5] The spacecraft cemetery region contains between 250 to 300 various spacecraft, and has been used by multiple international space exploration organizations, including crafts from China, Russia, and other countries.[6] Currently, the International Space Station is slated to enter the spacecraft cemetery in 2024 at the end of its lifespan.[6]
Location [Jelly]
[edit]The spacecraft cemetery is located inside the South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area, a region in the southern Pacific Ocean to the east of New Zealand.[7] The area, roughly centered on "Point Nemo", the oceanic pole of inaccessibility, is furthest away from any land.[7] The nearest islands are over 2,600 kilometers away from the center.[6][8] This location has been chosen for its remoteness and limited shipping traffic so as not to endanger human life with any falling debris.[7]
Incidents [Charles]
[edit]A total of more than 263 spacecraft were disposed in this area between 1971 and 2016.[9] The defunct space station Mir[10] and six Salyut stations[7] are among the nearly 200 pieces of Russian spacecraft debris in this region, making Russia the largest contributor of spacecraft in the cemetery.[1] The remaining pieces of debris in the cemetery belong to the United States, Europe, Japan, as well as certain private organizations. Among American spacecraft, remnants of the Skylab space shuttle were deposited into the spacecraft cemetery.[1]
The decommissioning of Tiangong-1, the first Chinese space station, was an unsuccessful targeted re-entry at Point Nemo. During an extended mission phase, control was lost due to a power failure, leading to an uncontrolled landing outside of the spacecraft cemetery.[11]
According to the U.S. guidelines dictating which spacecraft pose enough risk to require a controlled landing, it is recommended that the International Space Station undergo a controlled de-orbit at the end of its life. The same is recommended for the Hubble Space Telescope.[12]
Laws [Jelly]
[edit]Disposal of end of life spacecraft into the spacecraft cemetery is not strictly controlled despite frequent disposals into the zone and potential risks of re-entry. Since the South Pacific Ocean Uninhabited Area is beyond the jurisdiction of any country, very few laws restrict the activity of nations within this area. International treaties exist but do not clearly assign responsibility to countries about the liability for damages and pollution caused by re-entering space debris.[1]
Among the pertinent regulations, two general agreements concerning space debris and marine pollution are often expanded upon to govern the spacecraft cemetery.
First, the Outer Space Treaty proposed by the United Nations dictates that each state party is subject to the damages to other state parties caused by part of the registered spacecraft on the Earth, which include the ocean.[2] Therefore, countries are obliged to take action when disposal of registered spacecraft into the ocean causes damages to other parties. However, space debris in the ocean is often left unclaimed.[13]
In the perspective of ocean preservation, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, also known as Law of the Sea Convention (LOSC) commands that all states have the duty of protecting and preventing marine environment from pollution, even outside the jurisdiction of any state.[3] Nevertheless, this article is only practical when space debris is considered harmful to the marine environment.[14]
Environmental Impacts [Charles]
[edit]With 47% of re-entry mass coming from controlled re-entries, chemical spillage poses a risk to the marine environment. Hydrazine, a widely-used rocket propellant that is highly toxic to living organisms likely partially survives during re-entry. Radioactive chemicals present in spacecraft are also a cause for concern in the industry.[1]
There are numerous domestic and international regulatory bodies indented to mitigate potential environmental damage caused by spacecraft pollution.[1] The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is an international treaty overseeing marine pollution and its contributors.[15] This agreement defines pollution using three conditions: 1) the object must have been introduced into the environment by man, 2) the object contains substances, 3) the object must be detrimental to living organisms. Because it is difficult to know how much of a substance remains after it enters the atmosphere, the potential environmental risk of certain spacecraft entering the cemetery may be unknown, leaving much of the treaty up for interpretation.[1] Additionally, the EPA provides protocols on marine pollution declaring the responsibility for pollution mitigation to those who contribute to it and addresses regional cooperation between nations in order to find the least harmful solutions to debris disposal.[14]
Space Debris Disposal [Ginny]
[edit]Space Debris is any form of man-made object orbiting the earth that no longer serves a useful function.[1] Currently more than 27,000 pieces of space debris are orbiting earth at large velocities, threatening the safety of human and robotic missions, as well as causing damage to spacecraft.[1] There are few space debris removal processes, one of which is depositing large spacecraft in the spacecraft cemetery on earth. The most common way to eliminate space debris is to de-orbit crafts, causing them to burn up during re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere due to high velocities and air compression resulting in a temperature increase of air and the craft's surface.[16] Other common and less controlled processes for space removal include allowing the crafts to decay, collide with other objects, or causing them to explode, resulting in smaller pieces of space debris.[4] Currently, new processes for space debris removal are being developed to reduce the exponential growth of space debris orbiting earth, such as nets, magnetized collecting arms, and more.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l De Lucia, Vito. "From Outer Space to Ocean Depths: The 'Spacecraft Cemetery' and the Protection of the Marine Environment in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction". [[California Western International Law Journal". 2: 367–369 – via HeinOnline. Cite error: The named reference ":3" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b "Outer Space Treaty". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
- ^ a b "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea". https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf. Retrieved 2021-11-01.
- ^ a b c David, Leonard. "Space Junk Removal Is Not Going Smoothly". Scientific American. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
- ^ a b c "Where Do Old Satellites Go When They Die? | NASA Space Place – NASA Science for Kids". spaceplace.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
- ^ a b c "Point Nemo, Earth's watery graveyard for spacecraft". phys.org. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
- ^ a b c d Smith-Strickland, Kiona (14 May 2015). "This Watery Graveyard Is the Resting Place for 161 Sunken Spaceships". Gizmodo. Retrieved 27 October 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Where is Point Nemo?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
- ^ "This Is Where The International Space Station Will Go To Die". Popular Science. 2016-06-13. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
- ^ "Mir Re-entry - Updated Analysis". www.zarya.info. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
- ^ Brandon Specktor (2018-04-02). "The Chinese Space Station Narrowly Missed Landing in the World's Largest 'Spacecraft Cemetery'". livescience.com. Retrieved 2021-11-01.
- ^ Patera, Russell. "Hazard Analysis for Uncontrolled Space Vehicle Reentry". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 45: 1 – via Aerospace Research Central.
- ^ "Space Debris Removal, Salvage, and Use: Maritime Lessons". National Space Society. October 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
- ^ a b 1996 Protocol to the Convention of the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Waste and other Matter, 1972 (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. 1996.
- ^ United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. United Nations.
- ^ "What generates all the heat during re-entry when the space shuttle returns to Earth? | Science Guys | Union University, a Christian College in Tennessee". www.uu.edu. Retrieved 2021-10-28.