User:Georgewilliamherbert/TSMed
Tony Sidaway editor abuse
[edit]Involved parties
[edit]Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- User talk pages:
Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
[edit]- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Tony Sidaway 3
- Various discussions on Wikien-L:
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Tony Sidaway again
Issues not disputed
[edit]- Excessive signatures are bad for Wikipedia
Issues to be mediated
[edit]- Is widespread refactoring of excessive signatures editor abuse
- Should editors refactoring signatures simultaneously engage in good faith discussions to convince long-signature-editors to modify their behavior, rather than simply refactoring
Additional issues to be mediated
[edit]- N/a
Parties' agreement to mediate
[edit]- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
- Agree. Georgewilliamherbert 19:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
[edit]- Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
- For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)