To be frank, your tone seems just as provocative and combative. If you had infact bothered reading the Aviation Week article, it made NO MENTION of which radar was integrated on the aircraft. It could have been the EL-2032 or EL-2052 and since past sources seemed to indicate that the 2052 was the radar being integrated on the aircraft. In addition, if you'll note, I never accused you of sockpuppetry (Shovon76 was the one who actually added you to the SPI case) but clearly someone is lacking in investigative skills. Please also note that your edits closely mirrored another user's edits (Soupysoap) who was a sockpuppet for By78 who in the past has instated many false claims. Also, I am somewhat suspicious of any user who has a user page like this :
Reasons: Huge economies; Permanent veto members of the security council; Legal nuclear weapon states; Nations with the most advanced indigenous air force, navy and army
-
-
Hate: All others except Canada
-
-
Reason: I'm Canadian.
And for your kind information, I have inserted a lot of "negative" information about India particularly in the inability of its government to meet basic commitments in a vast number of sectors.Vedant (talk) 00:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
-
Other responses here were removed for reasons not specified by Ao333. The entire un-modified discussion can be found here
-
-
Hello,
-
The source you provided doesn't even mention which radar is being used. It just said that the Israeli Elbit MMR has been installed on the aircraft. Also, lets not forget that it got the IOC date wrong which leaves me to wonder what other factual inaccuracies it is riddled with. If you wish to edit the article further I suggest you back up your claims accordingly and thoroughly read referenced material before posting it. Vedant (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
-
-
Hello, if you have any common sense in aviation, you would know that the MMR in question is not AESA. The most recent model flew 2 days ago with EL/M-2032 MMR: [1], which is not AESA. Moreover, Israel has yet to confirm its sale of EL/M-2052 to India, dismissing talks of AESA mounted Tejas as simple speculation. Furthermore, as a matter of fact, my IOC dates were not wrong. If you bothered reading the sources I provided, you would notice that the dates contradict with yours. I accepted your source solely to comply with common Wikipedia practices in regards to "always quoting the earliest." In addition, your tone in a debate is often provocative, and threatening. Please refrain from labeling every edit on Tejas from those who are not from India as vandalism and falsely accusing others of socketpuppetry or any other Wikipedia offences, when the tide is not in your favor.Ao333 (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
-
-
And for your kind information, I have inserted a lot of "negative" information about India particularly in the inability of its government to meet basic commitments in a vast number of sectors.Vedant (talk) 00:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
-
-
I take it you're not responding to my claims because you agree with them? I've no issues with that. Oh on a side note, why did you remove this from your user page? I thought it made your user page look classy. Also I think you're missing a note from an administrator reminding you not to edit from multiple accounts. If you'd like, I can re-instate it for you unless you wanted it removed. Vedant (talk) 08:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
-
What claims are you speaking of? No, the admin said I had 2 accounts, but was not editing from both. Why do you so obsessed with me and what I put on my user page?Ao333 (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
Well you had to be using two accounts at some point as this page indicates the account was used until an administrator told you it was bad practice to use two accounts. Also, I'm not obsessed with what you put on your user page but I think that certain things that you removed from your user page as well as your comments on defence.pk directly affect your credibility on this site. I do see however that you have removed the offending material from your user page. On a side note, as a friendly grammar tip, it is why are you so obsessed and not why do you so obsessed.
That's me. What's your account name?Ao333 (talk) 23:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
I don't have an account there, I was just inquiring. My primary issue with that forum is that people spend too much time going OT on flame wars and nationalist jabbering and don't take part in much productive discussion. Vedant (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
Surprisingly, it seems we have something in common. As you are no doubt aware, LUPCOL is using Wikipedia as a conduit for channeling a pro-Russian POV. It seems he's intent on calling the Su-35BM a stealth fighter because Sukhoi deems it to be one. I'm going to submit an AN:I complaint so that his disruptive activities are known to the administrators but before I do that, I'd like you to take a look at his contributions and tell me if you agree.Vedant (talk) 22:17, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
I agree and have reflected my view on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. His contribution record shows that he has been in cases of Edit Warring in the past. Frankly, I'm more surprised of the fact that a Silesian is speaking well of Russia as both the Poles and Germans were devestated by the Soviet Union.Ao333 (talk) 11:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
While it has no bearing on the issue at hand, I think he is a member of the Russian minority in Poland (atleast one of the tags on his user page would seem to indicate that). Nevertheless, he appears to have stopped. Vedant (talk) 20:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for continued edit warring and tendentious editing over multiple pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid(Talk) 19:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
I've reverted you multilple linked additions of Republic of Taiwan in the AIDC F-CK-1 Ching-kuo article. This is POV-pushing, and unacceptable, not to mention gross overlinking. Please do not use WP articles as a soapbox for pushing your political views. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 19:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
I've reverted your edits on several articles because you have removed Taiwan from the numbering on lists that cite the CIA factbook which lists Taiwan in lists. Please stop. Griffinofwales (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
-
Your edits on List of regions by past GDP (PPP) are unacceptable POV-pushing which go against the established consensus on the article's talk page. Stop vandalizing it. GSMR (talk) 00:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
-
-
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chengdu J-10, you may be blocked from editing. Vedant (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
-
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Shenyang J-15, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Vedant (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chengdu J-10, you may be blocked from editing. Vedant (talk) 15:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ao333. Thank you. GSMR (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
