This is just common sense. Ask the publisher for permission, and credit them. Habeouscorpus (talk) 21:36, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, common sense differs. Even if it were a free image, it adds useful content only to the book article. If the image is seen as positive, it would be inappropriate weight to include it more than once . It belongs with the book. I'm more concerned about the possibility that those adding the image are using it to show how ridiculous they all are--and it that case it would certainly be excessive weight. People interested will find the article on the book & see the image there where it belongs. DGG (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC).
Well since I don't get the question, I'll put my reply here. Clause 8 makes an image only appear on the article of the subject of the picture. Since the Einstein guys are on the cover, inlude it in the main article. Pie is good(Apple is the best) 00:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Image is likely only acceptable on the article about the book itself. A description of the image will suffice on the other articles. -- Banjeboi 10:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
