This is the user sandbox of Earcanal. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

The idea

There are a lot of psychological studies. These tend to get summarised inline in journal articles but usually include information similar to the table headings below. Reading these summaries is very useful as you can quickly visualise a study or get the idea for a theory without reading a paper (or even an abstract, which don't follow a standard format). There is also knack to writing these summaries (which is good to learn, especially as a student^[1]). A comprehensive database of this type of summary would be very useful. I have a growing number of these tables in word processing documents (exported example) which I link to from other points in a document e.g.

Shallice & Warrington (1970) made a positive finding (green) regarding attention
- ... which had implications for Baddeley's theory (magenta) of working memory

I've exhausted the hypertext features of my word processor and I'd much rather keep this information in Wikipedia

Questions and thoughts

Is this an appropriate use?
Where would I put this information?
This sounds like a template ... ?
The biggest thing I've written on Wikipedia is the list of psychological effects, so generally ... Help! (Technically competent but need a Wikipedia intensive to get up to speed as quickly as possible.)

"Evidence" table

Who	When	WTD	Methods	Results Of Findings (ROF)	Implications	Participants (Ps)
Shallice & Warrington	1970	Neuropsychology/case study	Tests of STM, LTM, intelligence, spoken language comprehension	2 item auditory digit span. No general impairment of learning, comprehension and reasoning.	STM (impaired)/LTM (spared) distinct. STM as working memory.	KF. Brain damage from road accident.
Smith	1968	Example	Example	Example	Example	Example
Watkins^[2]	2008	"reviews research showing that repetitive thought (RT) can have constructive or unconstructive consequences"	Example	Example	Example	Example

Reading Code Organization Sheet (RCOS)

Who	When	ROF	SPL	CPL	GAP	RFW	POC/RPP
DiCataldo & Everett	2008	Non-killers had higher delinquency rating than killers	Extensive interest Definition	Scientiic validity of term	Scientific validity of term	Differential processing Explore motivation and circumstances	67.9% of adol. non-killers had anger problems while 37.5% of adol. killers reported anger problems

References

^ Shon, Phillip Chong Ho (2012-03-19). How to Read Journal Articles in the Social Sciences: A Very Practical Guide for Students. SAGE. ISBN 9781446281178.
^ Watkins, Edward R. (2008). "Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought". Psychological Bulletin. 134 (2): 163-206. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163. ISSN 0033-2909. Retrieved 2014-10-18. {{cite journal}}: C1 control character in |pages= at position 5 (help)

[1] Shon, Phillip Chong Ho (2012-03-19). How to Read Journal Articles in the Social Sciences: A Very Practical Guide for Students. SAGE. ISBN 9781446281178.

[2] Watkins, Edward R. (2008). "Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought". Psychological Bulletin. 134 (2): 163-206. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163. ISSN 0033-2909. Retrieved 2014-10-18. {{cite journal}}: C1 control character in |pages= at position 5 (help)

[1]

[2]