User:E8278/Temple of Fortuna Muliebris/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

Miano, Daniele. 2018. Fortuna : Deity And Concept In Archaic And Republican Italy. ^[1]
- This is a secondary source. Chapter 3 offers an overview of the temple's architecture, art, and stories associated with the goddess./
DiLuzio, Meghan J. 2016. “Salian Virgins, Sacerdotes, And Ministrae.” A Place At The Altar.^[2]
- This is also a secondary source. Provides background on the cult of Fortuna Muliebris and its priestesses; pg. 85-88
Schultz, Celia E. 2006. Women’s Religious Activity In The Roman Republic.^[3]
- This secondary source provides historical background on the funding and building of the temple.
Gorrie, C. (2004). "Julia Domna's building patronage, imperial family roles and the Severan revival of moral legislation." Historia: Zeitschrift fur Alte Geschichte, 61-72. AND/OR Gorrie, C. (2007). The Restoration of the Porticus Octaviae and Severan Imperial Policy. Greece & Rome, 54(1), 1-17.^[1]
- Julia's restoration
Woodard, R. D. (2020). "Coriolanus and Fortuna Muliebris." JASCA, 4, 1-32.
- The three women involved in the founding and historical background of Coriolanus. Information on first priestess and restrictions of the cult; pg. 2-10.
Atkinson, J. (2017, December). Valerius Maximus on Coriolanus. In Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1-21).
Fantham, E. (2002). The Fasti as a Source for Women's Participation. Ovid's Fasti: Historical Readings at Its Bimillennium, 23.
- Regarding the founding of the temple and Livia's connection in restoring it; cites Dionysius; pg. 449-451./
Flory, M. B. (1984). Sic Exempla Parantur: Livia’s Shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae. Historia: Zeitschrift Für Alte Geschichte, 33(3), 309–330.^[3]
- Talks about the architectural remains and Livia's restoration

References

^ ^a ^b Miano, Daniele (2018-03-08). Fortuna: Deity and Concept in Archaic and Republican Italy. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198786566.001.0001.
^ A Place at the Altar. Princeton University Press. 2016-11-01. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691169576.003.0004. ISBN 978-0-691-16957-6.
^ ^a ^b Schultz, Celia E. (2006). Women's religious activity in the Roman Republic. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-7725-8. OCLC 82483696.

[:0-1] Miano, Daniele (2018-03-08). Fortuna: Deity and Concept in Archaic and Republican Italy. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198786566.001.0001.

[2] A Place at the Altar. Princeton University Press. 2016-11-01. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691169576.003.0004. ISBN 978-0-691-16957-6.

[:1-3] Schultz, Celia E. (2006). Women's religious activity in the Roman Republic. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-7725-8. OCLC 82483696.

[1]

[2]

[3]