Jump to content

User:Deckiller/archive54

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Where would the characters be merged to? Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2? If that is the case, then yes, readding them to article was appropriate since your going to be adding more information later, making the rationale for fair use stronger. As it is now, it's really weak for a fair use image, but it's fine as long as it will be fixed later. Cheers! :) — Moe ε 03:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah the paragraph description could be avoided with an image (given it has the proper sources, rationales, etc). Those images are fine right now, I believe. If theres anything I can help with there, let me know and I'll see what I can do :) — Moe ε 03:37, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:FF8

[edit]

Looks good. I readded the thing at the end about Squall being lost since I felt it was pretty significant. I also noticed that some browsers come up with ugly whitespaces because the way the images are positioned so I rearranged those. Axem Titanium 14:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfB

[edit]

Thank you, Deckiller, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3).
I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.
Most sincere regards, Húsönd 23:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Obrigado, Deckiller, por participares no meu RfB, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3).
Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões. Calorosos cumprimentos, Húsönd 23:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos
Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

Thank you!

[edit]

Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Places in TP and OoT

[edit]

Please Transwiki as requested in both discussions. Thank you!KrytenKoro 15:22, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't have admin powers to access the deleted page, and I don't think I know any admins on the Zelda project, either. Would you be able to userfy the page into my userspace, so that I could copy it from there?
|*If this doesn't make any sense, then I guess I'm sorry. I'm not very familiar with this type of thing.KrytenKoro 05:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I copied the pages to the zelda wikia, where I will be messing with them to make them more in-line. Am I correct in assuming all I needed to do was copy and paste the script?KrytenKoro 21:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit]

Consensus was reached over the Global Defense Initiative storyline page, and the result was "keep".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Global_Defense_Initiative_storyline

I'd like this page re-instated immediatly. Thank you. DieOfGoodLuck 05:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Defense Initiative storyline (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brotherhood of Nod storyline. — Deckiller 06:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
I see. I frankly have had it with the games that are played on this glorified parody of an online "Encyclopedia", by petty individuals who apparently see a means in it to compensate for their lives away from a keyboard. My only regret is that I have to rain this down on someone who is the messenger of it.
If it is within your power to do so, then feel free to delete this account immediatly. If it is not, feel free to pass this request on to someone who can, at your earliest convenience. Or let this now inactive account instead take up space on Wikipedia indefinitely. That would be rather poetic really. DieOfGoodLuck 11:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Your opinion welcome at deletion review for Plot of Les Mis

[edit]

After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plot of Les Misérables closed as a deletion, I'm challenging the way the closing administrator acted as in violation of Wikipedia rules. Your participation is welcome at that discussion, Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 July 14. Please keep in mind that only arguments related to either new information or to how Wikipedia rules were violated or not violated in closing the discussion will be considered. It isn't a replay of the original AfD. I'm familiar with WP:CANVASSING and I am alerting everyone who participated in that discussion to the deletion review. I won't contact anyone again on this topic, and I apologize if you consider this note distracting. Noroton 04:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Happy first edit day Deckiller!

[edit]
HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY! from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE

Wishing Deckiller/archive54 a very Happy First Edit Day!

Have a fantastic day!

From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Have a great time, and mucho congrats! Lots of good wine for you. Cheers  ;-) --RobNS 00:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Happy first edit day! DarthGriz98 00:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Happy belated 2nd First Edit Day! — Blue 13:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

It's up!

[edit]

Ready for it? The Suikoden Task Force is now up and running! bwowen talkcontribs 05:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh man, don't even get me started on how great that whole sequence is. The music, the coloring, the dialog.. Flawless. Hope you had plenty of Fire Sealing runes. =p bwowen talkcontribs 06:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

The page for the Simpsons episode You Only Move Twice was made an FAC without my knowledge and to be honest, I don't think it's FA quality. But, I was wondering if you could take a look at the page and help improve it. -- Scorpion0422 06:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello again

[edit]

Thanks, Dec. Gosh, it's been a whole year. I tried to look over the project pages and their discussions and noticed quite a few changes since I was last here. Can you give me a quick rundown of what's been going on lately? ~ Hibana 18:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

All right. I doubt I'll be as active as I used to be, but I'll help out as much as I can. Maybe I can tinker with the Final Fantasy V article a little bit as well, since it's still got a few improvements to be made since I left it. ~ Hibana 14:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

New Raynor article

[edit]

I think that Clawed One has already done this for an earlier draft and you responded positively, but I'd like your opinion on the new Jim Raynor article. I'd ideally like you to post some comments in Talk:Jim Raynor (if possible something to sooth the people involved, because I can see it getting out of control again). -- Sabre 19:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

My Editor Review

[edit]

Hello! As I have worked with you on Wikipedia, I was wondering if you would be willing to comment in my editor review. I know you are probably busy with other contributions to the project, but I would greatly appreciate any comments or criticism that you have that could make me a better editor! Thanks very much for your time and consideration, bwowen talkcontribsreview me please! 13:53, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Just following up on my previous comment, still hoping you would have time to review me. It has been nearly a week now since I put up my review, and I still have not gotten much feedback. I would really like to know how I'm doing from many points of view, to help figure out the quality of my work so far and how to improve it in the future. I'm sure you are busy, but if you could just drop me a note letting me know whether or not you'll be able to do it, that would be terrific. Thank you so much for your time. Best regards, bwowen talkcontribsreview me please! 19:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

FFVIII characters

[edit]

It's all fairly stupid to me. The fact that they've been persisting with these "problems" for days now is irking me, but a gigantic argument isn't what that discussion page needs so I'm biting my tongue and trying to be polite. But regarding the surnames of Ward and Kiros, aren't they on those card thingies in the game? I knew Ward's last name, but I've never read the strategy guide, which means it had to come from somewhere in the game. Gamer Junkie 11:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't disagree with the pictures, either, but I don't believe they're absolutely necessary and articles with excessive images are usually frowned upon. The surname debate, however, is completely unnecessary. Gamer Junkie 11:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

U.M.N.

[edit]

I feel no compulsion to reverse the redirect, as I have no expertise in that area, but I cannot understand why it was made - the article to which it directs has no explanation of the U.M.N. (indeed, the word is mentioned only twice, with no details given whatsoever). Also, many links to U.M.N. still exist, when we are supposed to remove double-redirects. Can you please explain?KrytenKoro 10:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)