User:Deckiller/archive47
Hey, same name!
[edit]Haha, I just noticed we have the same name. Oh, and sorry for adding that spoiler warning, that was pretty silly of me.
Tyler 15:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Idea
[edit]you should make a template like urgent FACs or FARs except copyediting requests. Maybe article name, status, and reason. Seems like you are getting legit spam from people who need help (I was a lucky one), but you are getting a huge talk page from a bunch of "help me please"'s. Just an idea.--Clyde (talk) 00:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think if people contact you directly they believe they will get a better response rather than going to the LoCE. The requests for copyediting go back as far as January, I myself having a request going back to March. This could be easily frustrating combined with the fact that the VG peer review has severely slowed down, and the peer review has a backlog has like nothing I've ever seen. You do your thing, but I only wish you could clone yourself a hundred times. BTW, what happened to the third user you adopted? Maybe left?--Clyde (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. Is there any good Final Fantasy or RPG game not on a Sony system?
- P.P.S. You might want to put a sign that says no copyediting right now.
Smash
[edit]Alright, as long as my mother isn't a total pain tonite. I am usually on between 7-9PM CST. Quatreryukami 13:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
System Shock FAC (again)
[edit]I have my doubts that the League of Copyeditors will be able to address User:Tony1's recent opposition, if my request is ever responded to (request was placed on April 27, with no response yet). I had their help with F.E.A.R. awhile back, and found them to be pretty good, but not good enough to satisfy Tony1's 1a-based FAC objections. If you aren't too busy, could you give the article a run-through at some point? JimmyBlackwing 17:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about the copyedit request—I didn't know that you had stopped taking them. User:Zeality has cleaned up the prose, so would you mind re-evaluating the article, and striking your oppose if it's up to your standards? JimmyBlackwing 23:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]YIKES --> various; I was challenged :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it was a brilliant prose relic that has deteriorated, or I would have taken greater care ... still :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH
[edit]WHY DON'T YOU CREAT AN ALTERNATE REALITY WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE TO SPELL CORRECTLY? -kk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ViperSnake151 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC).
Reoccurring character names
[edit]Perhaps you could fold Gilgamesh and Cid articles into this new one, since it seems that they don't have much prospect for having enough out of universe info to stand on their own. :) 69.253.238.27 21:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- oops, forgot to sign in! Judgesurreal777 21:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll take a look over there. Judgesurreal777 21:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Ages/Seasons
[edit]I still believe that they'd be better seperate, however I am willing to conceded that if we put them together they could pass FA this time around. David Fuchs(talk / frog blast the vent core!) 21:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
ROTJ
[edit]Hey, I know you are NO LONGER ACCEPTING COPY-EDIT REQUESTS. Because you NEED TO FINISH WHAT I BEGAN WITH THE FINAL FANTASY WIKIPROJECT. ;) But I was hoping that you would copyedit Return of the Jedi as it is the last film in the Star Wars film series articles and I'd really appreciate your contribution. :) The Filmaker 22:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Re:Copyedit
[edit]No problem. I'd been meaning to do that for a while but I never got around to it until now (APs are DEATH). Axem Titanium 23:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Chrono Series
[edit]I feel like screaming over this featured topic nomination. They say they want a main series page, but I don't think one is feasible, and if it is than I would need to get some people to help put it together. Any thoughts? Judgesurreal777 18:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
FFTA Jobs
[edit]While I appreciate your initiative and agree that the article was enormously crufty, wouldn't you say that a small discussion could have preceded the redirect? I myself am fond of the concept of including only jobs unique to Final Fantasy Tactics Advance and perhaps moving the article to a subsection of the main game page- for instance, inclusion of only specific, unpreceded jobs, like the Juggler.
ShiraShira 01:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your time and consideration- we'll see how it follows at that point.
ShiraShira 01:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Happy Deckiller's Day!
[edit] |
Deckiller has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Love, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
Thank you, Tyler! :) And thank you for you kind words the other day at my talk page - they meant incredibly much to me. This is like, what, the umpteenth time you defend me... I think I'll officially appoint you my personal guardian angel :) Have a wonderful weekend, sweetie! Phaedriel - 01:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Happy day, man. If you manage to find some off time from being her guardian angel, could you be my bodyguard? bibliomaniac15 02:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
[edit]I accidentally reverted this page, I fixed it. Sorry. IvoShandor 03:50, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
any
[edit]Yes, both instances should be removed. Are you an admin? (Sorry, that might be taken as an insult.) Always good to intercede and improve language while other disputes surround a text. Tony 11:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
"Its" is readily understood in the context, yes? Here, both anys can be excised pure and simple, giving a cleaner wording that has more authority. Tony 11:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
""Material not supported by sources may be challenged and removed at any time." I prefer ""Material that is unsupported by sources may be challenged and removed." Tony 12:40, 14 May 2007 (UTC)