Jump to content

User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Academic Publishing in Europe 2012/Notes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Watch the video
Abstract   Start   Q & A   Research cycle   Journal of the future   Reuse   Summary   Q & A   Notes

For 2012, "the areas to watch include: Crowdfunding: Small donations can add up to decent funding for a focused project, and present unique outreach opportunities. In a field of shoestring budgets like paleontology, I see crowdfunding as a potentially important new trend. Article-level metrics and data set archival and citation: I've tied these two topics together because they reflect a major advance beyond the old journal-level metrics like Impact Factor. Neither topic is completely new, but I saw plenty of new tools at ScienceOnline that may move the discussions and usage of these metrics forward. Furthermore, there is still a long way to go for community buy-in."

Comments

[edit]

Metrics

[edit]

Notes from the conference

[edit]
  • PhD thesis of the future?
  • versioning
Springer Reference, "e-Ref"
  • brevity
wiki example
OWW

OAT

[edit]

http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Outlook

OSS 2011

[edit]

Formatting

[edit]

WiR

[edit]


Reuse

[edit]
  • About two decades ago, access to the scholarly literature was basically by subscription only
  • Then came the arXive, BMC, PLoS, Creative Commons et al., and now both green and gold OA provide access to over 10% of the scholarly literature
  • Haank, Schimmer, Burgelman: Gold OA is the "theme of the time", "only the beginning"
  • Burgelman: "Open Access is just the beginning"
show "Open Research" video, mention integration with multimedia
validate "data and knowledge"
diagram n authors, n publications, n data, on millimetre paper?
mention copyright, RAW and that most presentations are not really ready for CC BY-NC-ND
Template:Cite data
Burgelman: "What are the platforms of the future?"
mention EoR
publishers should feature/ highlight some of their content
show YouTube videos?
  • With more and more materials being available under CC licenses, one can start thinking about reuse
  • -NC-licensed stuff is basically not reusable
Funders, please stop covering the (full) fees for -NC articles
  • CC BY and - to a lesser extent - CC BY-SA materials are really reusable
  • Example: Wikimedia

Other

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dung_beetle

  • Parasitic wasps

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neoneurus_vesculus_ovipositing_in_workers_of_the_ant_Formica_cunicularia.ogv

  • MAKE THE POINT of every presentation so far having been in a static format, no use of multimedia, so basically publishing at the level of interactivity that arxiv has allowed for more than two decades now
  • curation (Wikipedia)
  • machine readability
Wikidata
evoke graphs of rising number of journals and articles
mention EoR
  • Build on the Living Reviews
Mention licensing
  • Mention SMW

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smallest_organisms&action=historysubmit&diff=470880559&oldid=465925542 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smallest_organisms&diff=cur&oldid=470880559

http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Outlook http://species-id.net/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Open-Access-Tage_2011/Wiki_approach/Reuse_of_OA_materials_on_Wikimedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-09-26/News_and_notes#Academic_journals_consider_partnering_with_Wikipedia


http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OAFD http://www.livingreviews.org/

Main weakness: non-open license; limited in scope

Cite-o-mter Total impact direct linking 3D PDF

interaction - who knows what Paedophryne amauensis is?

NMR wiki

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Daniel_Mietchen/Talks/Academic_Publishing_in_Europe_2012/Notes&oldid=473126776"