User:Daelyinh/sandbox

Article Evaluation of 'Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill'

   * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

All of the articles are relevant to the article topic. The page depicts a synopsis of Lillie Rosa Minoka-Hill's lifespan.

   * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

The article remains neutral as it seems to be written as a biography of the individual's life and succession. The article seems to be a positive changing and/or empowering Native American woman and their roles in society.

   * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

The viewpoints seem to be underrepresented. Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill is the second Native American Physician in the Western World, but it doesn't depict those who are on the rise amongst her during this time period. There could have been more Native American physicians that are possibly underrepresented, but missing validation from sources.

   * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

The sources come from credible sources such as the U.S. Library of Medicine and the noted history of Physicians at Drexel University College of Medicine.

   * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

Most references are with reliable sources that come from credible medical history sources such as U.S. Library of Medicine and the noted history of Physicians at Drexel University College of Medicine. Some fragmented sentences such as where the user stems her name from has no citations or credible sources, or whether it is relevant to the page.

   * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

There could be more information added to the history of Dr. Lillie Rosa Minoka-Hill. There is no information out of date, but there could be more information added as she seems to be an important figure for Native Americans in the Western World.

   * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

There are no conversations on the talk page, it seems that the article, in general, is ranked C-class meaning low importance.

   * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?

The article is rated C-class, low importance. The article is a part of WikiProject Biography, WikiProject New York (state), WikiProject Wisconsin, and WikiProject Indigenous People of North America. In which, all four shows that it is ranked C-class.

   * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

No, the Wikipedia discusses relevant material relating towards the course. It is a little shocking that the article is flagged as low-importance, but it makes sense since Dr. Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill is the second Native American physician instead of the first, so that may be the reason why she seems to be of low importance.

• Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Daelyinh (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC).

What are some significant cases that Dr. Lillie Rosa Minoka-Hill have impacted the lives of civilians that she has nurtured back to health?