Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
Wikipedia
This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.
Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article. Details here.
I might be what you call an "inclusionist." I don't like to see information deleted. If something is to be removed, then I think it should at least be considered how to explain it differently. As much as I hate commercial pollution of Wikipedia, you can still use language to make it clear that it may not be "encyclopedic," in nature. I believe leaving even the undesirable content in Wikipedia (as long as its explained in such way) can be encyclopedic, in and of itself. Having said that, though, I don't particularly like the idea of this whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" mentality... editing wars suck.
