Jump to content

User:Csinfe/C-complementarities in the finite element method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"

"

The C-complementarities in the finite element method (FEM) are five canonical principles, completeness, continuity, consistency, correctness and correspondence, that guide the finite element method. These canonical virtues cannot be achieved at the same time, these are complementarities. While the first four are prescriptive rules to ensure robust elements, the last is a descriptive rule defining exactly how the procedure works from an organising principle like the least action principle. In science, as well as in art (life), one finds that it is not possible to achieve all virtues at the same time. Confucius noticed that life is full of contradictions and conflicts and what is most important is to seek harmony and balance. It is the same with finite element computation.


References

[edit]
  1. Hu, H. C. (1955), On some variational methods in the theory of elasticity and palsticity, Scientia Sinica, 4, 33-54.
  2. Strang, G. and Fix G. F. (1966), Analysis of the Finite Element Method, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  3. Dym, C. L. and I. H. Shames,(1973), Solid Mechanics: A Variational Approach, McGraw-Hill.
  4. Washizu, K. (1982), Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity, Pergamon Pr, ISBN 0-08-026723-8.
  5. Cook, R. D. (1981), Concepts and applications of Finite Element Analysis John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  6. Zienkiewicz, O. C. & Taylor R. L. (1989), The Finite Element Method, London: McGraw-Hill.
  7. Prathap, G. (1993), The Finite Element Method in Structural Mechanics, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
  8. MacNeal, R. H. (1994), Finite Elements: Their Design and Performance, Marcel Dekker: NY, 264.
  9. Bathe, K. J. (1996), Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-301458-4.
  10. Rameshbabu, C., Subramanian, G. and Prathap, Gangan (1987), Mechanics of field-consistency in finite element analysis - A penalty function approach, Computers and Structures, 25 (2). pp. 161-173. ISSN 0045-7949 Full text
  11. Prathap, G. (1996), Finite Element Analysis and the Stress Correspondence Paradigm, Sadhana, 21,525-546.
  12. Mukherjee, S. and Prathap, G. (2001), Analysis of shear locking in Timoshenko beam element using the function space approach, Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 17, pp 385-393.
  13. Reddy, J. N. (2002), Energy Principles and Variational Methods in Applied Mechanics, John Wiley, ISBN 0-471-17985-X
  14. Prathap, G. and Mukherjee, S. (2004), Management-by-stress Model of Finite Element Computation, Research Report CM 0405, CSIR Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation, Bangalore, November 2004.[1]

Category:Continuum mechanics Category:Finite_element_method Category:Calculus of variations Category:Numerical differential equations Category:Structural analysis