User:Corrector623

Just trying to correct some glaring holes, like extremely prominent people and organizations in Atlantic Canada with no coverage at all, and strange holes in the redirect coverage of important processes (collective intelligence, mass peer review) with unclear scope.

Also why would linking to the official Twitter page for an organization, with the same name as the organization, be undone? Twitter has become part of the mainstream and it's constantly advertised. Wikipedia should be a reliable source on which Twitter address is the "real" Oprah or whatever...