Actual edit summaries found on Wikipedia. Names are elided to protect the innocent.

Edit summaries

Undid the same POV-pushing, consensus ignoring, discussion-free deletion of sourced content which (elided) has now made a couple dozen times.)

Utterly, utterly ridiculous. Black is white! Up is down!)

This is pretty amusing, and around and round we go. Black is white! Up is down! Take the red pill.)

Insert snarky, insulting edit summary here)

(Undid WP:Tagteam This material was added by consensus in talk. It will not be removed unless there is a consensus to do so in talk.)

Undid Undoing vandalism. Persist in this and I will seek to have you blocked.)

THIS IS AT LEAST THE FIFTH TIME YOU HAVE IGNORED AN ARDUOUSLY PRODUCED CONSENSUS ON THIS SUBJECT. DO NOT REMOVE IT AGAIN.)

You freaks need to give it a rest! :P

Further specific debunking of the outrageous fake policies (elided) repeatedly concocts

("Lying" is not the same as "rebutting")

(elided) just reverts whatever he sees fit and says "per talk". There was no Talk on this. The source doesn't support the statement, plain and simple. I may seek action against this account.)

(UNDONE: Ignoring a talk page discussion involving dozens of editors, mass deleting from the article without participating in the discussion, and then telling the reverter to "See talk" is RIDICULOUS.)

and more:

(Taking out the rabid dog)

walking the weasel

The ability to see complex analogies, and see past facile ones to the more relevant analogy is involved in most IQ tests. The concept of Islamofascism itself is based on just such a puerile analogy

Important

The above examples are given as examples of edit summaries which are not only unhelpful but directly contravene Wikipedia guidelines. Do not try imitating them! Edit summaries are intended to give a brief description of the edit.