Jump to content

User:Coffmanse/Fernwood Park race riot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Fernwood Park race riot was a violent racial conflict instigated by white residents against African American residents who inhabited the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) veterans' housing project in the Fernwood Park neighborhood in Chicago. The riot lasted for three days, from the day veterans and their families moved into the project, August 13th, 1947 to August 16th, 1947. It was one of the worst race riots in Chicago history.

Background

[edit]

Subsidized housing and racialized neighborhoods

[edit]

Housing projects in Chicago emerged during the 1940s with the sole purpose of resolving the shortage of affordable homes for black war-industry workers.[1] As Chicago proved to be a crucial steel production center for the war effort, hundreds of thousands of black workers and their families migrated from the South to Chicago in the second wave of the Great Migration.[1] Bowly iterates some alarming statistics about public housing in Chicago that arose from 1940 census data: 1) 55,157 housing units were overcrowded (exceeding 1.5 persons per room), and 2) 206,103 housing units either had no access to a private bathroom or needed major repairs to interior structures.[1] To answer to such dismal conditions, the CHA opened four housing projects in low income areas with high concentrations of war-industry workers: the Frances Cabrini Homes in August of 1942, the Lawndale Gardens in December of 1942, the Bridgeport Homes in May of 1943, and the Robert H. Brooks Homes in March of 1943.[2] For families to live in these new projects, they needed to have at least one child; the family had to have one member working in a critical war industry (like steel); the family income had to total less than $2,000; and it was preferred that the family's nationality was American.[3]

Additional housing projects for war workers led by the National Housing Agency and the Federal Public Housing Authority on the far South Side included the Altgeld Gardens project, which was constructed on a 157-acre vacant land tract in November of 1943.[4] Unlike the above projects, Altgeld Gardens contained row houses and backyards rather than crowded multi-story apartments.[5] Similarly, the West Chesterfield project homes were commissioned by the CHA and built in December of 1943.[6] A unique project, the housing units (actual homes) are built on full city lots, and following construction, the CHA required a minimum annual income as to promote eventual homeownership for residents.[7] While each of the projects identified presented reasonable options for war workers and their families, the end of the war would present different challenges, especially along the lines of integration.

After World War II

[edit]

As African American soldiers returned from Europe, the CHA shifted the initiative from creating housing for war workers and their families to providing temporary housing for returning veterans and their families.[8] The shift occurred in part because of the Emergency Veterans' Re-Use Housing Program, a federal law passed by Congress in 1945 that attempted to resolve the nationwide housing shortage for returning veterans.[9] Elizabeth Wood, the executive director of the CHA, planned to integrate the temporary veterans' housing projects, as she had "absorbed [the] spirit" of both the values of United States in its efforts to combat fascism and authoritarianism abroad during World War II, and also the energy and hope of black veterans who sought to "challenge the country to live up to its wartime rhetoric about freedom."[9] Although the goal of integration contrasted the visions of the Democratic City Council and Illinois governor Dwight Green, Chicago's mayor, Edward Kelly, was a proponent of CHA's vision for integrated veterans' housing and nondiscrimination policy.[10]

Chicago's temporary projects were to be constructed in the fall of 1946 and set to close in July of 1949.[9] The first of these projects opened peacefully on the isolated North Side.[9] However, the CHA's second project, the Midway Airport Homes, resulted in mass discontent and violence prior to and after black families moved in. Midway's delicate white working-class community reacted violently to the thought of black families entering the segregated neighborhood. Midway's white population overwhelmingly believed the space should be reserved for deserving white veterans. When the first black family moved into the completed project on November 16, 1946, a white stone-throwing mob descended upon the building, and police had to protect the black family after they asked to leave.[11] White aggression and mob violence successfully preserved Midway's homogenous demographic.

Bradford Hunt argues the failure of the Airport Homes integration marked a turning point for the CHA—the "racial liberalism" that CHA and Mayor Kelly promoted was directly challenged by white desire to uphold the racial purity of segregated neighborhoods.[12] Chicago City Council members and aldermen also noticed Kelly's increased effort to maintain the CHA integration initiative over other mismanaged and corrupt areas of the Democratic political machine.[10] To maintain the influence of the Democratic party in the city, key party leaders encouraged Kelly to retire in 1947.[13] He was replaced by Martin Kennelly, a pro-business, anti-CHA Democrat who prioritized private real estate interests and the expansion of the downtown business district.[14]

Fernwood Park

[edit]

Fernwood Park is a neighborhood in the larger Roseland community on the far south side of Chicago. Other neighborhoods in Roseland include Lilydale, Princeton Park, Rosemoor, Sheldon Heights, West Roseland, and part of West Chesterfield. In the early 1940s, the neighborhood was an ethnically mixed European immigrant community. The CHA initiated the construction of the Fernwood Park Homes, a one story project with 87 two-bedroom-units for veterans and their families.[15] Elizabeth Wood revealed to Fernwood Park community members in May of 1947 that the project would welcome white and black veterans.[16] Since Fernwood Park was the only remaining white neighborhood in its immediate area, white residents recognized the promise of integration as a threat to the stability of their white homogenous environment.[17]

Rioting

[edit]

On August 13, 1947, eight black veterans and their families moved into the CHA Fernwood Park housing project from 104th to 106th and Halsted.[16] Hirsch suggests that the mob spontaneously organized outside of the housing project the evening after the families moved in.[18] Scholars have estimated that anywhere from 500 to 5,000 white rioters gathered to reclaim the neighborhood.[19]

The violence lasted three days, during which white gangs damaged property belonging to African Americans. Rioters threw stones, committed arson, and pulled black people out of automobiles to beat them.[20] Approximately 100 cars were attacked.[20]

Police response

[edit]

Nearly 1,000 police officers were ordered to protect the Fernwood Park project residents, but overall, the Chicago police did little to stop or disperse organized mobs or gangs.[20] Police set up barricades in order to identify and isolate the area of violence, which stretched from 95th Street to 130th Street going north/south, and from Michigan Avenue to Vincennes Avenue going east/west.[21]

Police as targets of the mob violence and the idea that the extreme violence in Fernwood was because the neighborhood was the only remaining white neighborhood in Roseland area; it was surrounded by black neighborhoods[17]

Police instigating violence?

Aftermath

[edit]

Arrests and injuries

[edit]

Only 113 people were arrested for rioting at the Fernwood Park Homes.[22] Hirsch presents an ethnic analysis of the reported arrests, in which the largest European ethnicity represented was Dutch (26.3%); other ethnicities were German (14.7%), Irish (7.7%), Italian (6.5%) Scandinavian (5.6%), Polish (5.3%), and Slavic (4.4%).[23]

Additionally, at least 35 black people reported injuries from white mob violence.[19]

African American reaction to the riot

[edit]

African American neighborhoods that surrounded Fernwood Park threatened to retaliate against the white mobs.[24] Neighboring black Morgan Park residents and inhabitants of the Fernwood Homes threw stones at white people who walked past the project.[24] Violence only deescalated when the Chicago Commission on Human Relations and Archibald Carey, Jr., an African American alderman, addressed Roseland's black population.[24]

Additionally, the African American population in the Roseland area increased exponentially following the riot. Takei cites census data for Chicago neighborhoods to track the increase—while only 4.2% of Roseland was African American in 1940, the black population had grown to 97.5% by 1980.[25] The statistic represents rapid white flight from the area.

Political response

[edit]

Both the Fernwood Park riot and the Airport Homes riots highlighted white intransigence and refusal to accept black integration into white spaces. The integration objectives of the CHA "proved too fragile to withstand the prejudices, preferences, and mobility of whites" who resided in segregated communities.[26] In response to the riots, Mayor Kennelly and Chicago City Council aimed to reduce the CHA's influence and restore the Democratic party's control over housing initiatives. Thus, new policy required that CHA gain approval from the Housing Committee of City Council before beginning construction of public housing projects.[27] Similarly, Kennelly appointed the Chicago Land Clearance Commission in 1947, ultimately removing the CHA's ability to designate land for slum clearance and renewal.[26] Finally, Chicago public housing moved to an open occupancy agenda rather than an integration agenda, which encouraged black people to select housing in any area, but still failed to promote black mobility into white areas.[26]

Chicago police disaster response reform

[edit]

In just a few months after the Fernwood Park race riot, the Chicago Police Department (CPD) engaged in tactical changes to ensure faster response times to crises.[28] Quick mobilization and Plan Five, or the disaster plan, "brought 27 squad cars to a designated location in less than fifteen minutes."[29] Riot and civil disorder control also called for the organization of special police battalions, in which a total of 660 men and 98 police vehicles could arrive at any location in Chicago on "'short notice.'" Last and most significantly, the Chicago police promoted heavier levels of policing in areas where black people were moving in at higher rates.[29] While these reforms improved disaster response, the department failed to address racial bias in individual officers in effective ways—human relations turned to hour-long classroom training seminars that would hopefully alter the lifelong biases of officers.[30] Without meaningful bias training, systemic racism in the department hindered the ability of CPD to limit or end race riots.[30]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. Bowly, Jr, Devereux (2012). Poorhouse: Subsidized Housing in Chicago (2nd ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-9068-7.
  2. Hirsch, Arnold R. (1983). Making the Second Ghetto: Race and Housing in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 0-226-34244-1.
  3. Hunt, D. Bradford (2010). Blueprint for Disaster: The Unraveling of Chicago Public Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-36087-4.
  4. Satter, Beryl (2009). Family Properties: Race, Real Estate, and the Exploitation of Black Urban America. New York: Metropolitan Books. ISBN 978-0-8050-7676-9.
  5. Takei, Hiroshi (2013). "The Unexpected Consequence of Government Manipulation: Racial Disturbances at Chicago's Public Housing for Veterans in the 1940s". Journal of American and Canadian Studies. 31: 49–77.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Bowly 2012, p. 30.
  2. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 30-35.
  3. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 31.
  4. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 37.
  5. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 38.
  6. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 40.
  7. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 40-41.
  8. ^ Bowly 2012, p. 42.
  9. ^ a b c d Bradford Hunt 2010, p. 80.
  10. ^ a b Bradford Hunt 2010, p. 82.
  11. ^ Bradford Hunt 2009, p. 81.
  12. ^ Bradford Hunt 2010, p. 81.
  13. ^ Bradford Hunt 2009, p. 82.
  14. ^ Bradford Hunt 2010, p. 83.
  15. ^ Takei 2013, p. 63.
  16. ^ a b Bowly 2012, p. 44.
  17. ^ a b Hirsch 1983, p. 90.
  18. ^ Hirsch 1983, p. 88.
  19. ^ a b Satter 2009, p. 46.
  20. ^ a b c Takei 2013, p. 67.
  21. ^ Hirsch 1983, p. 70.
  22. ^ Hirsch 1983, p. 81.
  23. ^ Hirsch 1983, p. 82.
  24. ^ a b c Takei 2013, p. 68.
  25. ^ Takei 2013, p. 65.
  26. ^ a b c Bradford Hunt 2010, p. 100.
  27. ^ Takei 2013, p. 69.
  28. ^ Hirsch 1983, p. 95.
  29. ^ a b Hirsch 1983, p. 96.
  30. ^ a b Hirsch 1983, p. 97.