User:Chzz/rat
Appearance
List of the unique pages
[edit]Key
[edit]- OK ---- The decision was OK, we don't have to worry
- Unsure ---- We need to check further
- Wrongness ---- Bad decision; needs sorting out
A
[edit]- Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_creation/National_Association_of_Youth_Theatres_(NAYT)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_creation/Outdoor_Research
- Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_creation/AVANEESWARAM.S.R.VINU
- Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_creation/Kevin_Circosta
- Wikipedia talk:Articles_for_creation/The_People's_Picture_Company
B
[edit]- ^Deserved. Crude humor by "BoredAtWork"Shearonink (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDEDShearonink (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- ^basically a stub, actually has notability, might need more outside refs/inline citations BUT not sure about decline since it is virtual duplicate of other WIkipedia published articles about previous editions in series. Shearonink (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- FURTHER ACTION NEEDEDShearonink (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- ^Tag has already been removed by HJMitchell on 17:24, 10 July 2010, HJ has been working with creator since July 9th. Creator (Finglese) has created/edited article since initial action by editor in question.Shearonink (talk) 18:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- NO ACTION NEEDEDShearonink (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- ^Probably deserved, no inline citations, poor references, but article could probably be brought up to standards with some work. Seems to have Notability, Googling "music under the stars el paso" gets over 100,000 hits.Shearonink (talk) 18:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- FURTHER ACTION NEEDEDShearonink (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- ^Not a decline, article got "B" rating?...OH, but Ratinator was the article Creator *and* the Quality-Assessor. Shearonink (talk) 18:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- FURTHER ACTION NEEDEDShearonink (talk) 21:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- Umm... looks OK to me. ~Gosox(55)(55) 21:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- I apologize, I have apparently mis-read the page history(even though I could swear when I read the edit history that the editor in question was the Article-Creator) - but maybe I was thinking about Talk:Front Row Wrestling?...wait a minute...odd. Creator is 72.74.198.170, an edit was just now performed by 72.74.196.83... Oh well, I'm sure you're right Gosox, just something seems off about the timing and the article getting a "B" rating right off the bat. Shearonink (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
C
[edit]- No article here, just a listing of accomplishments with one reference/source...Wikipedia is not a resume listing service. Shearonink (talk) 04:32, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- This is kind of an odd one to me. Yes, the decline is correct but if the article-creator was encouraged to find two more sources then I think it would probably qualify for AfC.Shearonink (talk) 10:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Probably deserved, but I don't think the article-writer understands at all inline citations and sources/references, plus for some reason I thought this one was on hold or something.Shearonink (talk) 04:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
D
[edit]- Created but in urgent need of help. Dunno why it was marked C-class, perhaps due to length. ~Gosox(55)(55) 21:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)