Are you connected to the subject of the article? If so, you have a conflict of interest, and should not write the article.
Is it notable? There are no sources, so I have no idea. Does it have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject? Ie newspapers, books, magazines?
If it does, then, the next issue is that all the facts in the article must be supported by reliable sources.
At the moment, it reads like an advert, not an encyclopaedia article. Language such as "inspiring the groundbreaking social movement to take a leadership role" is absolutely not a neutral point-of-view.
In summary - please re-read WP:FIRST. Chzz ► 22:06, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
