User talk:Charzar2

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Cheeselor1 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

April 2007

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Rudi and the Gays. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. Kim dent brown 14:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to Rudi and the Gays, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Thank you. Kim dent brown 14:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 15:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charzar2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has made no contributions to couse it to be blocked. it is not a sock puppet in any way.

Decline reason:

This is a transparent lie. — Yamla 21:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Charzar2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i do not see how what i have said is a lie. i have not made any contributions on any articles. i do not know any cheeselords an am in no way a vandal.

Decline reason:

Admins review unblock requests, and admins can see deleted articles, like Rudi and the Gays which makes the whole thing pretty obvious. —dgies^t_c 22:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You contributed to the deleted article, Rudi and the Gays. Are you denying your other abusive sockpuppets, Charzar1 (talk · contribs), Charzar4 (talk · contribs), and Charzar5 (talk · contribs)? --Yamla 22:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]