Jump to content

User:CKC29/Border Cave

Coordinates: 27°01′30″S 31°59′20″E / 27.02500°S 31.98889°E / -27.02500; 31.98889
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead

[edit]

27°01′30″S 31°59′20″E / 27.02500°S 31.98889°E / -27.02500; 31.98889

CKC29/Border Cave is located in South Africa
Border Cave
Border Cave
class=notpageimage|
Border Cave Location


Border Cave is an archaeological site located in the western Lebombo Mountains in Kwazulu-Natal. The rock shelter has one of the longest archaeological records in southern Africa, which spans from the Middle Stone Age to the Iron Age.[1]

Border Cave Excavations

The west-facing cave is located about 100 m below the crest of the Lebombo range.[2] The variable rates of weathering of the Lebombo's Jurassic rocks led to the cave's formation. [2][3]

Researchers have excavated at Border Cave since 1934. In chronological order, excavations occurred in 1934 (Raymond Dart), 1940 (W.E. Horton, non-scientific), 1941-1942 (Cooke, Malan and Wells),[4] 1970-1975, and 1987 (Peter Beaumont). Lucinda Backwell and colleagues reopened the site in 2015, and are currently excavating and analyzing more archaeological materials. [5] Researchers have used a combination of carbon-14 dating, amino acid racemisation, luminescence, and electron spin resonance to date the site's oldest deposits to ~250,000 years before present. [6] Border Cave's remains include modern human bones, lithics, bone tools, botanical remains (i.e. grass bedding) and animal bones. [7][8][4]

Border Cave's long occupational sequence makes the site an important location for studying prehistoric hunter-gatherer behavior and the causes and timing of the Middle to Later Stone Age transition.[9] The site's human remains have led to debates on the timing of modern human origins in southern Africa. [10][11] Some of the cave's other artifacts (i.e. bone points) have also played into researchers' debates on the origins of hunter-gatherer cultural adaptations and the appropriateness of ethnographic analogy in interpreting the archaeological record. [12]

Regional Setting

[edit]
Acacia spp.

Border Cave is located at 27°01′19″S, 31°59′24″E within the Kwazulu region.[1] The site is near the Eswatini/South Africa border at an altitude of 600 meters above sea level (masl).[1] The mouth of the cave faces west over the Eswatini lowveld biome. The Jozini Rock Formation's Jurassic age rocks (182.1 +/- 2.9 million years old) are the main types that make up the cave.[3]

The main rivers near Border Cave include Usuthu, Ngwavuma, and Pongolo Rivers, which all flow from West to East. [2] They all cut through the mountains and flow over horizontal beds of faulted rock. These rivers converge into Delagoa Bay. [2] These rivers also erode certain areas of the Lebombo Mountains and cause differential weathering amongst the Karro rocks (i.e. the Stormberg basalts and Ecca shales). Rhyolites, feldspar and quartz are common to the Border Cave region. [2][13]

Modern Environment

[edit]
Canthium spp.

Current annual rainfall is approximately 820 millimetres (32 in) at the town Ingwavuma, which is roughly 12 kilometres (7.5 mi) south of Border Cave.[14] The cave resides in a biodiversity hotspot called the Maputoland Center of Endemism, which has abundant riverine and lowveld vegetation. [2] The specific vegetation zones that occur near Border Cave include Lebombo Summit Sourveld, and Northern and Southern Lebombo Bushveld. [5] Vegetation surveys indicate that the main plants common to Border Cave include Androstachys johnsonii, Acacia spp., Combretum spp., Olea europaea subsp. africana, Canthium spp., Dichrostachys cinerea, Diospyros dichrophylla, Eretia rigida, Euclea divinorum, Euphorbia tirucalli, Maytenus spp., Eragrostis, Spirostachys africana, Strychnos henningsii and Vitex wilmsii. [14][5]

Overview of Ngwavuna River from Border Cave

Paleoenvironment

[edit]

Rodent and insectivore remains (primarily from Angoni vlei rat, pygmy mouse, and least dwarf shrew) suggest that Border Cave vegetation communities changed multiple times during the Late Pleistocene. [14] These communities include miombo savanna woodland (heavily wooded environment, ~250,000-100,000 years BP), Zululand Thornveld (predominantly grasses, ~100,000-50,000 years BP), Mopane, and Lowveld/arid Lowveld (savanna woodland type environment, ~50,000-24,000 years BP).[6][14] Annual rainfall was at least 25-100% higher during the miombo savanna woodland period than today, but less than 10% of rainfall occurred during the winter.[14] There were relatively high mean annual temperatures, which are comparable to the current conditions found further north. [14] The replacement of miombo woodland by Zululand Thornveld would have likely meant a 20% to 30% increase in precipitation, and a change to Lowveld would have meant a 15% decrease in precipitation.[14] In sum, mean annual rainfall would have decreased from 200% of present day rainfall to 60% of present day mean annual rainfall from the beginning to end of Border Cave's sequence.[14]

Excavation History

[edit]

Raymond Dart directed preliminary excavations at Border Cave in 1934. He dug an exploratory trench east-west trench close to Border Cave's entrance.[4] Although Dart found Middle Stone Age artifacts, he did not publish any of his findings.[4]

W.E. Horton dug at Border Cave in 1940, though only for agricultural purposes.[1] Horton excavated for bat guano, and exposed artifacts and human remains in the process.[1] However, he displaced these artifacts and remains from their original context and left his excavated sediment at the site (what some researchers call "Horton's Pit"). [5][4]

Cooke and colleagues re-excavated Horton's sediment during 1941-1942 and recovered the human remains. These remains included a partial adult cranium and other human remain fragments (individuals BC1 and BC2). Cooke and colleagues also discovered a mostly intact infant skeleton (BC3) at the site alongside some Conus shells.[4][15]

Peter Beaumont excavated the site between 1970-1975. Beaumont, Todd and Miller jointly excavated more material in 1987. During these excavations, Beaumont and colleagues excavated two areas in the North and South parts of the cave.[16] They recovered enamel samples from a human mandible (specimen BC5) for electron spin resonance dating.[17] The sample returned a date of 74,000 +/- 4,000 years BP. [17] Beaumont analyzed the site's stratigraphy (mostly comprised of alternating Brown Sand and White Ash layers)[2] and material culture (particularly the lithics) to a greater degree of detail than previous researchers. [16][5] Beaumont suggested that four cultural layers at Border Cave existed, which included MSA 1 (Pietersberg), MSA 2b (Howiesons Poort), MSA 3 (post-Howiesons Poort) and ELSA (Early Later Stone Age). [5][16]

Lucinda Backwell's team from the University of the Witswatersrand reopened the site in 2015 and are currently excavating more deposits.[1] These current excavations have focused on redefining the excavation grid and determining precise proveniences of artifacts larger than 2 cm using a total station. [5] The team is also trying to update faunal and lithic analyses of Border Cave's newly excavated material. [5]

Site dating

[edit]

Researchers have used electron spin resonance and radiocarbon dating to date the oldest sediments of Border Cave to 227,000 +/- 11,000 years BP and the youngest deposits to 41,100-24,000 years BP. [17] Luminescence dates extend the oldest age of the site to ~250,000 years BP, though the rest of these luminescence dates roughly align with the electron spin resonance and radiocarbon dates. [18]

Paleoanthropological findings

[edit]
Border cave Homo sapiens skull

Researchers have documented anatomically modern human remains from nine different individuals at Border Cave (BC1, BC2, BC3, BC4, BC5, BC6, BC7, BC8a, and BC8b), though researchers have lost the remains from four of those individuals (BC 6, BC 7, BC8a, and BC8b). [11] Researchers have used electron spin resonance (ESR) to directly date some of these remains.[4][17]

BC1 is an incomplete cranium that W.E. Horton found during his 1940 excavation. [17] BC1's ages remains uncertain, though ESR returned dates of 77,000 +/- 2,000 years BP and 161,000 +/- 10,000 to 144,000 +/- 11,000 years BP. [11] Amelie Beaudet and colleagues' analysis of BC1 states that the cranial vault is similar in shape to anatomically modern humans, but also shares some similarities in bony labyrinth with fossil hominins such as Homo erectus.[11]

BC2 is a partial mandible from W.E. Horton's excavation. The provenance and date for this individual remain unknown.[4]

BC3 is a nearly complete infant skeleton that Cooke and colleagues found in 1941. Cooke and colleagues found perforated Conus bairstowi shells with the infant, which likely came from the eastern Cape coast. Carbon-14 dating of the the shell returned an age of ~ 33,570 +/- 120 years BP. [4] Some suggest that the infant burial represents one of the earliest southern African examples of burial ornamentation. [15]

BC4 was likely an Iron Age specimen, though researchers could not reliably date the individual. [17]

BC5 is a nearly complete mandible that some researchers previously believed to date to the Iron Age. [17] However, more recent ESR dates of BC5's dental enamel place the age at 74,000 +/- 5,000 years BP. [19]

Researchers lost BC6 (humerus), BC7 (proximal ulna) and BC8a and BC8b (two metatarsals), and lack adequate provenance information to accurately date these remains. [17]

Archaeological Findings

[edit]

Middle Stone Age (MSA)

[edit]

Botanical Remains

[edit]

Border Cave preserves botanical remains dating back to ~227,000 years BP, which are older than those of previous archaeological sites in southern Africa (i.e. Sibudu Cave). The oldest plant remains are grass beds from layers dating to 231,000-179,000 years BP.[20] The bedding, which is composed of Panicoideae grasses and occassional sedges and dicotyledenous leaves, is located near the rear of the cave. [5] The burnt charcoal within the grass bedding and alternating stratigraphic layers of brown sand and white ash represent multiple burning events over time. [20] Burn marks on Border Cave's grass bedding tend to only occur near the edges, rather than throughout the beds, which may indicate that these edges may have accidentally been burned. [20] In total, there are 48 bedding layers.[1] There are also Hypoxis rhizomes within Border Cave's hearths, which suggest that the cave's inhabitants cooked plants for food. [20] Regular burning occurred by 170,000 years BP according to the phytolith record. [21] Other phytolith remains include Chloridoideae and Pooideae grasses. [21]

Lithics

[edit]
Backed stone tool (one edge blunted to ~90 degrees)

Raymond Dart uncovered "Middle Stone Age" lithics in his preliminary excavations of Border Cave, though he did not formally analyze them. [4] Peter Beaumont's Border Cave lithic analysis is the most comprehensive. Beaumont recognized two distinct stone tool industries for Border Cave's MSA layers: Howiesons Poort (HP) (from layers dating 81-65 kya) and MSA 3/post-Howiesons Poort (post-HP) (from layers dating 64-44 kya). [16] Beaumont found many punched blades, backed pieces and triangular retouched pieces in the HP layers. [16] The MSA 3/post-HP layers had very few backed pieces, and instead had more prepared cores. [16]

Unretouched Levallois point

Paloma de la Pena and colleagues later analyzed lithics from the same layers at Border Cave. A majority of these lithic raw materials were rhyolite or basalt, though quartz, chalcedony, agate and chert also occur within this assemblage.[7] Backed pieces occur in the HP layers, but are absent in the MSA 3/post-HP layers. [7] Other retouched tools such as notched pieces, and denticulates occur in the MSA 3/post-HP layers, though in lesser quantities. [7]

The MSA 3/post-HP layers contain mostly unretouched triangular points.[22] Lithic analysis suggests that hunter-gatherers used both Levallois and discoidal reduction techniques to produce these points. [23] These points' morphologies (particularly the discoidal ones) are very different from one another, which has led some to believe that there was a lack of planning in lithic reduction strategies.[23] Lucy Timbrell and colleagues hypothesize that the lack of retouch of the MSA 3/post-HP points may be due to low site occupation intensity, raw material abundance, point hafting requirements, or the sufficiency of unretouched tools in accomplishing tasks.[23] This is in constrast with assemblages from other sites (i.e. Sibudu Cave), which preserve a greater abundance of retouch debris. [23][24] Small platform bladelet cores and bipolar cores and flakes also occur in the MSA 3/post-HP layers.[7]

Fauna

[edit]
springbok
bushpig

Border Cave's Middle Stone Age fauna were primarily mammals, though there are a few bird types represented in the assemblage. [25][8] The most abundant mammals were hares and small-large bovids (i.e. grysbok, oribi, klipspringer, mountain reedbuck, impala, bushbuck, springbok, hartebeest, wildebeest).[8] Other animals such as bushpig, warthog, chacma baboons, vervet monkeys, honey badges, and Burchell's zebra also occur in the assemblage.[8] At least three currently extinct species are also present in the faunal assemblage (one of which is Bond's springbok).[8] Even more recently excavated faunal material from the MSA layers is heavily fragmented, likely due to taphonomic damage. [25] Faunal analysis suggests that hunter-gatherers transported the whole small animal carcasses back to the site, but only parts of larger animals back. [8] Border Cave's faunal remains also do not show evidence of carnivore tooth marks. [25] Some researchers suggest that this evidence is enough to claim that humans were the main individuals who brought these materials back to the site. [25]

land snail shell

From 170-60 kya, beige, brown and grey land snail shell fragments also appear in the Middle Stone Age sequence (i.e. Metachatina kraussi - brown lipped agate snail). [26] Experiments show that land snail shell color changes in response to heat application, and have led researchers to believe that Border Cave occupants cooked and ate land snails.[26] The presence of heated shell fragments and absence of any modifications on the shells have led researchers to suggest that Border Cave inhabitants primarily cooked land snails and did not use them for tool manufacture. [26]

Early Later Stone Age (ELSA)

[edit]

Fauna and Organic Tools

[edit]

Border Cave experienced generally very little change in faunal composition from the MSA to the LSA. [8] However, Border Cave occupants made organic artifacts dating to 44-42 ka during the ELSA. These artifacts include notched bones, wooden digging sticks, and pointed bones (some of which have ochre) made from warthog, bushpig and baboon. [12] The functions of these tools remain speculative. Francesco d'Errico and colleagues in particular interpret pointed bone tools to be awls and bone points, and suggest that an incised baboon fibula from the site is a number-keeping device. [27] One of the notched sticks contains poison residues composed of ricinoleic and ricinelaidic acids, and d'Errico and colleagues assume this item to be a poison applicator. [12]

Lithics and Groundstone

[edit]

Border Cave's lithic assemblage features comparatively more bipolar knapped pieces and fewer blades than the MSA (precisely the MSA 3/Post-HP layers). [28] Raw material changes also occurred during the ELSA. In particular, chalcedony, milky quartz and crystal quartz become more prominent in the assemblage, and rhyolite becomes less so. [28] Other lithics include small, unretouched tools, some of which have traces of resin (possibly from Podocarpaceae plants). [28] Bored stones also occur at the site, which some presume to have been digging stick weights. [28]

Ostrich eggshell and Marine shell

[edit]

Ostrich eggshell and marine beads, which some suggest as evidence of ornamentation amongst Later Stone Age hunter-gatherer groups, [29] occur in Border Cave's ELSA sequence. Marine beads were of Nassarius kraussianus, Conus ebraeus, and Conus bairstowi, the last of which is endemic to the Eastern Cape coast. [15] The Conus shells were in close association with an infant burial (BC3), which have led to speculation that these shells were ornaments. [15]

Debates Surrounding the Site

[edit]

Debates on Human Remains

[edit]

Border Cave is one of the only Southern African archaeological sites that contains human remains dating to the MSA. [11][30] A particular debate surrounding these remains relates to whether they belong to anatomically modern Homo sapiens.[31][13] This debate has implications for timing of modern Homo sapiens' evolution in southern Africa.[13] A large part of the uncertainty stems from the fact that the provenance of some of the human remains is still unknown. [11] Herta De Villiers' analysis of BC3 (infant skeleton) body dimensions suggests that the human remains represent a precursor to modern African humans. [31] Philip Rightmire on the other hand performed a discriminant analysis on BC1 (adult cranium), which revealed that Border Cave's human remains were similar to modern-day African populations. [10] Researchers have criticized Rightmire for improperly using discriminant analysis and for considering BC1's relation only to African populations and not others. [10][32] Other studies have reassessed BC1's similarities and differences with African and non-African populations, and suggest that BC1 is dissimilar from modern African humans. [32][33] The most recent analysis of Border Cave's human remains suggests that BC1 possesses a similar cranial vault morphology to anatomically modern humans, but has bony labyrinth features that are similar to other hominins (i.e. Homo erectus). [11]

Applicability of Ethnographic Analogy to the Archaeological Record

[edit]

Interpretations of some of Border Cave's artifacts call into question whether ethnographic models are appropriate for making inferences about the archaeological record. In particular, there has been debate on whether analyzing modern hunter-gatherer behavior is appropriate for understanding prehistoric hunter-gatherer behavior. [34][35][36]

A point of contention amongst archaeologists is whether Border Cave's organic ELSA artifacts represent the evolution of a San hunter-gatherer culture in southern Africa during the Pleistocene. d'Errico and colleagues propose that these organic artifacts represent the evolution of a Pleistocene San adaptation on the grounds that these artifacts look similar to those of modern San populations. [12] In particular, they suggest that the archaeological bone points, digging sticks, bone awls, poison residues, and shell beads are roughly indistinguishable from those of modern San hunter-gatherers.[12]

However, Pargeter and colleagues dispute these claims on the basis that these tools are not uniquely 'San', and occur in the toolkits of other hunter-gatherers as well. [34][37] Secondarily, they suggest that the function of some of these tools is speculative (i.e. people may have used pointed bones as awls, needles, or projectile points), and that Border Cave's occupants may not have used tools in similar ways to modern San hunter-gatherers. [34][37] Pargeter and colleagues also suggest that simply referring to archaeological populations as 'San' oversimplifies the variation between hunter-gatherer populations. [34][37]

Middle to Later Stone Age Transition

[edit]

A prominent debate in regards to the African archaeological record concerns the timing of the MSA-LSA transition. Researchers typically use technological changes (i.e. use of retouched points and Levallois flakes in the MSA to bipolar bladelets in the LSA) to determine the date of the transition.[29][9] Some researchers propose that this shift occurred ~30,000 years BP, though Border Cave's technological transition occurs ~44,000-42,000 years BP. [28] Because of this, the question remains as to whether technological changes began at Border Cave and then later spread to other archaeological sites. Since LSA technology does not occur prior to ~27,000 years BP in localities surrounding Border Cave (i.e. Sibebe in Eswatini, Niassa in Mozambique), some dispute the claim that Border Cave represents a true origin for the Middle-Later Stone Age transition.[9] However, the question still remains unresolved. [1]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h Backwell, Lucinda; Wadley, Lyn; d’Errico, Francesco; Banks, William E.; Peña, Paloma de la; Stratford, Dominic; Sievers, Christine; Laue, Ghilraen; Vilane, Bawinile; Clark, Jamie; Tribolo, Chantal; Beaudet, Amélie; Jashashvili, Tea; Carlson, Kristian J.; Lennox, Sandra (2022-09-01). "Border Cave: A 227,000-year-old archive from the southern African interior". Quaternary Science Reviews. 291: 107597. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107597. ISSN 0277-3791.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Butzer, K.W.; Beaumont, P.B.; Vogel, J.C. (1978). "Lithostratigraphy of Border Cave, KwaZulu, South Africa: a Middle Stone Age sequence beginning c. 195,000 b.p." Journal of Archaeological Science. 5 (4): 317–341. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(78)90052-3. ISSN 0305-4403.
  3. ^ a b Riley, T.R.; Millar, I.L.; Watkeys, M.K.; Curtis, M.L.; Leat, P.T.; Klausen, M.B.; Fanning, C.M. (2004). "U–Pb zircon (SHRIMP) ages for the Lebombo rhyolites, South Africa: refining the duration of Karoo volcanism". Journal of the Geological Society. 161 (4): 547–550. doi:10.1144/0016-764903-181. ISSN 0016-7649.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Cooke, H. B. S.; Malan, B. D.; Wells, L. H. (1945). "3. Fossil Man in the Lebombo Mountains, South Africa: The 'Border Cave,' Ingwavuma District, Zululand". Man. 45: 6. doi:10.2307/2793006.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i Backwell, Lucinda R.; d'Errico, Francesco; Banks, William E.; de la Peña, Paloma; Sievers, Christine; Stratford, Dominic; Lennox, Sandra J.; Wojcieszak, Marine; Bordy, Emese M.; Bradfield, Justin; Wadley, Lyn (2018-08-18). "New Excavations at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa". Journal of Field Archaeology. 43 (6): 417–436. doi:10.1080/00934690.2018.1504544. ISSN 0093-4690.
  6. ^ a b Tribolo, Chantal; Mercier, Norbert; Dumottay, Charles; Cantin, Nadia; Banks, William E.; Stratford, Dominic; de la peña, Paloma; Backwell, Lucinda; Wadley, Lyn; Francesco d’Errico (2022). "Luminescence dating at Border Cave: attempts, questions, and new results". Quaternary Science Reviews. 296: 107787. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107787.
  7. ^ a b c d e de la Peña, Paloma; Colino, Fernando; Francesco d’Errico; Wadley, Lyn; Banks, William E.; Stratford, Dominic; Backwell, Lucinda (2022). "Lithic technological and spatial analysis of the final Pleistocene at Border Cave, South Africa". Quaternary Science Reviews. 296: 107802. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107802.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Klein, Richard G. (1977). "The Mammalian Fauna from the Middle and Later Stone Age (Later Pleistocene) Levels of Border Cave, Natal Province, South Africa". The South African Archaeological Bulletin. 32 (125): 14. doi:10.2307/3887843.
  9. ^ a b c Bader, Gregor D.; Mabuza, Ayanda; Price Williams, David; Will, Manuel (2022). "Rethinking the Middle to Later Stone Age transition in southern Africa - A perspective from the highveld of Eswatini". Quaternary Science Reviews. 286: 107540. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107540. ISSN 0277-3791.
  10. ^ a b c Rightmire, G. Philip; Beaumont, Peter B.; Bilsborough, Alan; Butzer, Karl; Davies, Oliver; Gilead, Isaac J.; Groves, Colin P.; Howells, W. W.; Irsigler, F. J.; Luchterhand, Kubet; Merrick, Harry V.; Rolland, N.; Thurzo, Milan; Wilson, S. R.; Wymer, J. J. (1979). "Implications of Border Cave Skeletal Remains for Later Pleistocene Human Evolution [and Comments and Reply]". Current Anthropology. 20 (1): 23–35. doi:10.1086/202201. ISSN 0011-3204.
  11. ^ a b c d e f g Beaudet, Amélie; Francesco d’Errico; Backwell, Lucinda; Wadley, Lyn; Zipfel, Bernhard; de la Peña, Paloma; Reyes-Centeno, Hugo (2022). "A reappraisal of the Border Cave 1 cranium (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)". Quaternary Science Reviews. 282: 107452. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107452.
  12. ^ a b c d e d’Errico, Francesco; Backwell, Lucinda; Villa, Paola; Degano, Ilaria; Lucejko, Jeannette J.; Bamford, Marion K.; Higham, Thomas F. G.; Colombini, Maria Perla; Beaumont, Peter B. (2012-08-14). "Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (33): 13214–13219. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204213109. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3421171. PMID 22847420.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  13. ^ a b c Rightmire, Philip (1981). "More on the Study of the Border Cave Remains". Current Anthropology. 22 (2): 199–200. doi:10.1086/202658. ISSN 0011-3204.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h Avery, D.M. (1992). "The environment of early modern humans at Border Cave, South Africa: micromammalian evidence". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 91 (1–2): 71–87. doi:10.1016/0031-0182(92)90033-2.
  15. ^ a b c d d'Errico, Francesco; Backwell, Lucinda (2016). "Earliest evidence of personal ornaments associated with burial: The Conus shells from Border Cave". Journal of Human Evolution. 93: 91–108. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.01.002.
  16. ^ a b c d e f Beaumont, P. (1978). Border Cave [MA Thesis]. University of Cape Town.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h Grün, Rainer; Beaumont, Peter (2001). "Border Cave revistied: a revised ESR chronology". Journal of Human Evolution. 40 (6): 467–482.
  18. ^ Tribolo, Chantal; Mercier, Norbert; Dumottay, Charles; Cantin, Nadia; Banks, William E.; Stratford, Dominic; de la peña, Paloma; Backwell, Lucinda; Wadley, Lyn; Francesco d’Errico (2022). "Luminescence dating at Border Cave: attempts, questions, and new results". Quaternary Science Reviews. 296: 107787. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107787.
  19. ^ Grün, Rainer; Beaumont, Peter; Tobias, Phillip V; Eggins, Stephen (2003). "On the age of Border Cave 5 human mandible". Journal of Human Evolution. 45 (2): 155–167. doi:10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00102-7.
  20. ^ a b c d Wadley, Lyn; Esteban, Irene; de la Peña, Paloma; Wojcieszak, Marine; Stratford, Dominic; Lennox, Sandra; d’Errico, Francesco; Rosso, Daniela Eugenia; Orange, François; Backwell, Lucinda; Sievers, Christine (2020-08-13). "Fire and grass-bedding construction 200 thousand years ago at Border Cave, South Africa". Science. 369 (6505): 863–866. doi:10.1126/science.abc7239. ISSN 0036-8075.
  21. ^ a b Esteban, Irene; Stratford, Dominic; Sievers, Christine; Peña, Paloma de la; Mauran, Guilhem; Backwell, Lucinda; d’Errico, Francesco; Wadley, Lyn (2023). "Plants, people and fire: Phytolith and FTIR analyses of the post-Howiesons Poort occupations at Border Cave (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)". Quaternary Science Reviews. 300: 107898. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107898.
  22. ^ Timbrell, Lucy; Peña, Paloma de la; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda; Francesco d’Errico; Wadley, Lyn; Grove, Matt (2022-12). "Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of 'post-Howiesons Poort points' from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa". Quaternary Science Reviews. 297: 107813. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ a b c d Timbrell, Lucy; Peña, Paloma de la; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda; Francesco d’Errico; Wadley, Lyn; Grove, Matt (2022-12). "Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of 'post-Howiesons Poort points' from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa". Quaternary Science Reviews. 297: 107813. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  24. ^ Will, Manuel; Bader, Gregor D.; Conard, Nicholas J. (2014-05-30). "Characterizing the Late Pleistocene MSA Lithic Technology of Sibudu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa". PLOS ONE. 9 (5): e98359. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098359. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4039507. PMID 24878544.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  25. ^ a b c d Stratford, Dominic; Clark, Jamie L.; Wojcieszak, Marine; Wadley, Lyn; d'Errico, Francesco; de la Peña, Paloma; Esteban, Irene; Sievers, Christine; Banks, William E.; Beard, Thomas; Horn, Maryke; Shadrach, Kelita; Morrissey, Peter; Mauran, Guilhem; Backwell, Lucinda (2022). "Geoarchaeology and zooarchaeology of Border Cave, South Africa: Initial multiproxy considerations of stratigraphy and site formation processes from the Backwell et al. excavations". Quaternary Science Reviews. 291: 1–26.
  26. ^ a b c Wojcieszak, Marine; Backwell, Lucinda; Francesco d’Errico; Wadley, Lyn (2023). "Evidence for large land snail cooking and consumption at Border Cave c. 170–70 ka ago. Implications for the evolution of human diet and social behaviour". Quaternary Science Reviews. 306: 108030. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108030.
  27. ^ d'Errico, Francesco; Doyon, Luc; Colagé, Ivan; Queffelec, Alain; Le Vraux, Emma; Giacobini, Giacomo; Vandermeersch, Bernard; Maureille, Bruno (2018-02-19). "From number sense to number symbols. An archaeological perspective". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 373 (1740): 20160518. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0518. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 5784044. PMID 29292345.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  28. ^ a b c d e Villa, Paola; Soriano, Sylvain; Tsanova, Tsenka; Degano, Ilaria; Higham, Thomas F. G.; d’Errico, Francesco; Backwell, Lucinda; Lucejko, Jeannette J.; Colombini, Maria Perla; Beaumont, Peter B. (2012). "Border Cave and the beginning of the Later Stone Age in South Africa". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (33): 13208–13213. doi:10.1073/pnas.1202629109. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 3421194. PMID 22847432.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  29. ^ a b Tryon, Christian A. (2019). "The Middle/Later Stone Age transition and cultural dynamics of late Pleistocene East Africa". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 28 (5): 267–282. doi:10.1002/evan.21802. ISSN 1060-1538.
  30. ^ Grine, Frederick E.; Wurz, Sarah; Marean, Curtis W. (2017). "The Middle Stone Age human fossil record from Klasies River Main Site". Journal of Human Evolution. 103: 53–78. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.12.001.
  31. ^ a b De Villiers, Hertha (1973). "Human skeletal remains from Border Cave, Ingwavuma District, KwaZulu, South Africa". Annals of the Transvaal Museum. 28 (13): 229–246.
  32. ^ a b Corruccini, Robert S. (1992). "Metrical reconsideration of the Skhul IV and IX and Border Cave 1 crania in the context of modern human origins". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 87 (4): 433–445. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330870405. ISSN 0002-9483.
  33. ^ Van Vark, Gerrit; Bilsborough, Alan; Dijkema, Jacob (1989). "A further study of the morphological affinities of the Border Cave 1, cranium, with special reference to the origin of modern man". Anthropologie et Préhistoire. 100: 43–56.
  34. ^ a b c d Pargeter, Justin; MacKay, Alex; Mitchell, Peter; Shea, John; Stewart, Brian A. (2016). "Primordialism and the 'Pleistocene San' of southern Africa". Antiquity. 90 (352): 1072–1079. doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.100. ISSN 0003-598X.
  35. ^ Barnard, Alan (2007). "Kalahari revisionism, Vienna and the'indigenous peoples' debate*". Social Anthropology. 14 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2006.tb00020.x.
  36. ^ Forssman, Tim (2022). "An Archaeological Contribution to the Kalahari Debate from the Middle Limpopo Valley, Southern Africa". Journal of Archaeological Research. 30 (3): 447–495. doi:10.1007/s10814-021-09166-0. ISSN 1059-0161.
  37. ^ a b c Pargeter, Justin; MacKay, Alex; Mitchell, Peter; Shea, John; Stewart, Brian A. (2016). "'Primordialism and the 'Pleistocene San' of southern Africa': final reply". Antiquity. 90 (352): 1087–1089. doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.131. ISSN 0003-598X.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:CKC29/Border_Cave&oldid=1165988395"