User:CHOCOLATE.bubble

Bio

About me:

A little about me is that I love to play soccer and also play a little tennis. Although my favorite sport to watch is baseball. I love to go on walks or hikes, just like to be outdoors really. Also animals are a big part in my life and I love just about all animals. I also like art and baking. I travel a lot and love to drive to new places and discover new things. Do you know that a cheetah can run up to 98 km/hr and this means it could run 100 meters in just over 3 seconds.

My Wikipedia Interests:

Topics I am interested in to work with my Wikipedia page in the future is animals and or dinosaurs. I think that I would like to do research on these topics and add fun facts about them and little reads. I would hope to add a little more perspective and info to other articles about animals and even some info about geography and are worlds land.

Article Evaluation

I have been interested in golden tigers for a while now and they always seem to catch my eye. They are very unique and I think they deserve more attention. I visited the Golden tiger article on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: important information that is missing, it is very neutral point of view, it is cited but needs more supporting cites.

Important information missing

I have noticed that in the article their are a lot of questions I have about golden tigers even after reading the article. I feel like it didn’t talk about what, or how the golden tigers live, act, or eat it just talks how they are breed. I feel like that information could be easily added and make the article strong.

Point of view

The article talks a lot about golden tiger breading and how it is genetics that causes them to be golden. It is a very neutral point of view and doesn’t force an opinion towards the reader and it only sticks to the facts and not the authors opinion on the subject.

Citations

There are some citations on the page but not many. If I click on the cites they do come up and are listed at the bottom of the article but the cites aren’t up to date and don’t give a lot of evidence or supporting facts. It could use a lot more reliable sources to make it a stronger article.  

Conclusion

Overall, I think this article is ok but could be better. The information that was provided gives me some knowledge about golden tigers but I am still left with so many questions about them. The article does keep it very neutral point of view but, It doesn’t speak much about the animals lives and where they come from or what they do day to day. The cites provided aren’t very reliable and don’t explain much, which I think adding more info and cites would help others understand golden tigers a little more.