User:Broncoviz/sandbox/Results

Results by Regions

Region	Zingaretti	Martina	Giachetti	Sources
Abruzzo	63.8%	23.0%	13.2%
Aosta Valley	62.2%	23.3%	14.5%
Apulia
Basilicata	50.5%	36.8%	12.7%
Calabria
Campania	48.6%	44.0%	7.4%
Emilia-Romagna	70.7%	17.1%	12.1%
Friuli-Venezia Giulia	71.4%	18.4%	10.2%
Lazio
Liguria	69.6%	19.5%	10.3%
Lombardy	65.2%	22.1%	12.7%
Marche	62.1%	18.4%	15.5%
Molise	84.0%	8.9%	7.3%
Piedmont	66.7%	19.0%	14.3%
Sardinia
Sicily
South Tyrol	65.9%	22.9%	11.2%
Trentino	68.4%	20.7%	10.9%
Tuscany	61.7%	21.5%	16.8%
Umbria	62.8%	21.1%	16.1%
Veneto	67.8%	20.8%	11.3%
World	59.6%	31.8%	8.6%

Result by provinces

! style="background:#f2e8ce;" Giachetti

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_Italy https://radiogold.it/politica/175828-primarie-partito-democratico-nicola-zingaretti-vince-in-provincia/ http://www.pdpiemonte.it/2019/02/congresso-2019-le-liste-dei-candidati-allassemblea-nazionale/ http://www.pdpiemonte.it/2019/03/congresso-2019-i-delegati-del-piemonte-eletti-in-assemblea-nazionale/

Province	Region	Zingaretti		Martina		Giachetti		Valid votes	Invalid votes	Total votes	Sources
		Votes	%	Votes	%	Votes	%
Agrigento	Sicily	5,298	72.26%	1,329	18.12%	687	9.37%	—	—	7,331
Alessandria	Piedmont	4,972	63.96%	1,112	14.30%	1,690	21.74%	7,774	41	7,815
Ancona	Marche	8,735	67.35%	2,066	15.93%	2,170	16.72%	12,968	69	13,037
Aosta	Aosta Valley	927	62.17%	347	23.27%	217	14.55%	—	—	1,500
Arezzo	Tuscany	7,657	64.01%	1,775	14.84%	2,530	21.15%	—	—	12,048
Ascoli Piceno	Marche	3,003	68.17%	561	12.74%	841	19.09%	4,405	21	4,426
Asti	Piedmont	1,662	63.61%	424	16.23%	527	20.17%	—	—	2,662
Avellino	Campania	7,191	42.22%	7,967	46.78%	1,873	11.00%	—	—	17,031
Bari	Apulia		63.91%		29.84%		6.25%			26,656
Barletta-Andria-Trani	Apulia	6,109	71.28%	1,366	15.94%	1,095	12.78%	8,570
Belluno	Veneto	2,151	65.96%	751	23.03%	359	11.01%	3,261	19	3,280
Benevento	Campania	5,983	34.76%	9,957	57.85%	1,271	7.38%	17,211	439	17,650
Bergamo	Lombardy	10,763	54.83%	6,695	34.13%	2,158	11.00%	19,616	122	19,738
Biella	Piedmont	1,712	68.98%	487	19.62%	283	11.40%	2,482	16	2,498
Bologna	Emilia-Romagna	34,379	71.22%	7,834	16.23%	6,058	12.55%	—	—	48,653
Brescia	Lombardy	15,470	61.69%	5,558	23.49%	3,718	14.83%	25,076	103	25,179
Brindisi	Apulia	3,959	67.56%	1,351	23.05%	550	9.39%	—	—	—
Cagliari	Sardinia
Caltanissetta	Sicily
Campobasso	Molise
Caserta	Campania	15,691	59.85%	9,229	35.20%	1,298	4.95%			26,686
Catania	Sicily	13,801	60.04%	7,746	33.70%	1,438	6.26%			23,048
Catanzaro	Calabria
Chieti	Abruzzo
Como	Lombardy
Cosenza	Calabria
Cremona	Lombardy
Crotone	Calabria
Cuneo	Piedmont	5,298	67.09%	1,749	22.15%	850	10.76%	7,897	61	7,958
Enna	Sicily
Fermo	Marche
Ferrara	Emilia-Romagna
Florence	Tuscany
Foggia	Apulia
Forlì-Cesena	Emilia-Romagna
Frosinone	Lazio	20,391	90.60%	1,225	5.44%	890	3.95%	—	—	22,620
Genoa	Liguria
Gorizia	Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Grosseto	Tuscany
Imperia	Liguria
Isernia	Molise
La Spezia	Liguria
L'Aquila	Abruzzo
Latina	Lazio
Lecce	Apulia
Lecco	Lombardy
Livorno	Tuscany
Lodi	Lombardy
Lucca	Tuscany
Macerata	Marche
Mantua	Lombardy
Massa and Carrara	Tuscany
Matera	Basilicata
Messina	Sicily
Milan	Lombardy
Modena	Emilia-Romagna
Monza and Brianza	Lombardy
Naples	Campania
Novara	Piedmont	3,424	63.08%	1,123	20.69%	881	16.23%			5,475
Nuoro	Sardinia
Oristano	Sardinia
Padua	Veneto
Palermo	Sicily
Parma	Emilia-Romagna
Pavia	Lombardy
Perugia	Umbria
Pesaro and Urbino	Marche
Pescara	Abruzzo
Piacenza	Emilia-Romagna
Pisa	Tuscany
Pistoia	Tuscany
Pordenone	Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Potenza	Basilicata
Prato	Tuscany
Ragusa	Sicily
Ravenna	Emilia-Romagna	13,070	67.59%	3,755	19.42%	2,512	12.99%	19,337	386	19,723
Reggio Calabria	Calabria
Reggio Emilia	Emilia-Romagna
Rieti	Lazio
Rimini	Emilia-Romagna
Rome	Lazio
Rovigo	Veneto
Salerno	Campania
Sassari	Sardinia
Savona	Liguria
Siena	Tuscany
Sondrio	Lombardy
South Sardinia	Sardinia
South Tyrol	Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
Syracuse	Sicily
Taranto	Apulia	5,801	62.66%	2,284	24.67%	1,172	12.66%	9,257	62	9,319
Teramo	Abruzzo
Terni	Umbria	5,598	65.76%	1,741	20.45%	1,174	13.79%	8,513	50	8,563
Trapani	Sicily
Trento	Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol
Treviso	Veneto
Trieste	Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Turin	Piedmont
Udine	Friuli-Venezia Giulia
Venice	Veneto
Verbano-Cusio-Ossola	Piedmont	2,005	68.34%	478	16.29%	451	15.37%			2,953
Vercelli	Piedmont	1,559	65.31%	488	20.47%	324	13.57%			2,387
Verona	Veneto
Vibo Valentia	Calabria
Vicenza	Veneto
Viterbo	Lazio
TOTAL		1.257.091	69,17%	362.691	19,96%	197.630	10,87%	1.817.412	21.526	1.838.938

Color scheme

See this page's history and the main page redesign archives. I forget when or why they diverged. Help talk:Using colours

Wikipedia Color Chart
Hue	Border		Header		Accent		Background
H150	#A3BFB1	H:150 S:15 V:75	#CEF2E0	H:150 S:15 V:95	#E6FFF2	H:150 S:10 V:100	#F5FFFA	H:150 S:4 V:100
H212	#A3B0BF	H:212 S:15 V:75	#CEDFF2	H:212 S:15 V:95	#E6F1FF	H:212 S:10 V:100	#F5FAFF	H:212 S:4 V:100
H265	#AFA3BF	H:265 S:15 V:75	#DDCEF2	H:265 S:15 V:95	#F0E6FF	H:265 S:10 V:100	#F9F5FF*	H:265 S:4 V:100
H0	#CCCCCC	H:0 S:0 V:80					#FCFCFC	H:0 S:0 V:99

Shadow Cabinet

Zef

Naminé

Rielach

Uriel

Gingerbread

Fyan

Nebbia

Lelouch

Nik

Airesem

Frei

Pandora

Ayakashi

Last Century

Yuna

Revenant

Keiko

class=notpageimage|

Places I've visited

Official Opposition Shadow Cabinet of the Republic of Patana []

Portfolio	Shadow Minister	Term
Leader of the Opposition	Iida Juntunen MP	2056–present
Shadow First Secretary of State Deputy Leader of the Opposition	Oskari Helminen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Foreign Affairs Shadow Minister of the Cordellan Sea Council Co-Leader of the Farmers Party	Aliisa Hyytiäinen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Finance	Kasperi Huovinen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Defence	Urho Tervo MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Justice Shadow Minister of Constitutional Affairs	Ruuta Lyytikäinen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Home Affairs	Nuutti Laamanen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Forestry	Juhani Keskitalo MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Commerce, International Trade and Industry	Rami Kuokkanen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Arts, Culture, Media and Leisure	Einari Eerola MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of International Development	Taavi Valtonen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Education and University	Lyyti Palomäki MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Energy Resources	Kata Reinikainen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Climate, Environment, Natural Resources and Water	Voitto Lind MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Health	Helmi Lindström MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Housing Shadow Minister of Local Government Co-Leader of the Farmers Party	Topi Mikkonen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship	Liisa Koskela MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Development, Infrastructure and Transport Shadow Minister of Information and Communication Technology	Miikka Luostarinen MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Employment and Welfare	Iines Kuusela MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Research and Science	Teuvo Mäki MP	2056–present
Shadow Minister of Equalities, Family, Youth and Women	Kaija Lehikoinen MP	2056–present
Also attending shadow cabinet meetings
Shadow Leader of the Parliament	Into Nevala MP	2056–present

Election

2019 Rhenish general election

17 August 2019
All 247 seats in the National Assembly 124 seats needed for a majority
Registered	11,514,551
Turnout	83.82%
First party Second party Third party   Leader Valentina Schulman Alfons Ehmann Kristina Freitag Party United Republic Rhenish National Republican Socialist Leader since 6 June 2006 20 August 2013 12 July 2017 Leader's seat Aachen-Düren Ludwigshafen-Speyer Duisburg-Essen Last election 64 seats, 25.1% 58 seats, 23.2% 38 seats, 15.3% Seats won 62 50 36 Seat change 2 8 2 Popular vote 2,380,505 1,927,012 1,410,855 Percentage 24.7% 20.0% 14.6% Swing 0.4% 3.2% 0.7%   Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party   Leader Julia Kranefuss Christopher Hahn Emmeline Schmeid Party Radical United Radical Left German People's Front Leader since 19 January 2017 1 July 2010 22 April 2016 Leader's seat Bochum-Dortmund Düsseldorf-Mönchengladbach Bochum-Dortmund Last election 24 seats, 9.3% 31 seats, 12.5% 15 seats, 6.2% Seats won 33 30 20 Seat change 9 1 5 Popular vote 1,261,177 1,154,040 768,803 Percentage 13.1% 12.0% 8.0% Swing 3.8% 0.5% 1.8%   Seventh party Eighth party   Leader Valentin Ribbeck Stanislaus Scheibel Party Ecologists Rhenish Centre Leader since 10 June 2015 3 October 2018 Leader's seat List (ran in Bonn-Altenkirchen) Aachen-Düren Last election 8 seats, 3.6% 9 seats, 3.7% Seats won 9 7 Seat change 1 2 Popular vote 357,622 281,362 Percentage 3.7% 2.9% Swing 0.1% 0.8%
Prime Minister before election Valentina Schulman PVR Elected Prime Minister Valentina Schulman PVR

The 2019 American federal election was held on 10 July 2019 to elect all 584 members of the Congress of the Federation, comprising the 311-member Congressional Assembly and 273-member Congressional Council. The incumbent Civic Action–Popular Constitutional Freedom government, led by Chancellor Eleanor Campbell, was seeking a fifth term.

The election was a resounding defeat for the government. The Progressive Green Left, contesting its first federal election, won in a landslide, scoring majorities in both houses of Congress. Civic Action lost almost nine percentage points of its voteshare, winning less than a quarter of the overall vote, its worst result since 1998. Popular Constitutional Freedom, the junior partner of government, also suffered a downswing. American Alliance suffered particularly badly, losing almost half its voteshare and over two-thirds of its Congressional representation; leader Dominic Callahan lost his Council seat. The Radical Socialist Alternative took small losses in both houses, while Democratic Future entered Congress for the first time with 8 seats overall and just under 5% of the total vote. Traditional Voice expanded its Congressional representation beyond Tennessee for the first time, picking up a new lower house seat in Ohio.

Chancellor Campbell conceded defeat early on election night, announcing her resignation as both party leader and Congresswoman. PGL leader Kenna Snow-Newman claimed victory shortly thereafter. She was sworn in as Chancellor the next day. She became the first ever green Chancellor and the first Chancellor from the Congressional left since 2005. 2019 was the first federal election since 1979 in which a single party won a majority in either house of Congress.

Background

In late 2014, long-serving Chancellor Alexander Blackwell announced his intention to step down in early 2015, citing age and worsening health. His successor, as determined by a Civic Action party ballot in December 2014, was Minister for Justice Eleanor Campbell. Blackwell resigned on 12 January 2015, with Campbell sworn in the same day. In March, Campbell announced that she intended to approach President Kian Murphy to call an early election. Civic Action dominated the protracted campaign amongst a splintered opposition. The governing coalition was returned with a similar result to their 2011 victory, despite a fall in voteshare. In the lower house, Civic Action won 130 seats, while PCF won 44; overall, a commanding majority of 174 seats. In the upper house, they won 124 and 39 respectively, for a total of 163.

The opposition was the most divided in living memory. The Green Progressives made the largest gains in the election, narrowly becoming the second largest party, and the largest in opposition, with just 47 seats. American Alliance won 40 seats, its best result to date, while the Labor Party recorded its worst result since 1924, coming in fifth place with 37 seats. The Radical Socialist Alternative also tied its previous best result, winning 12 seats. Televangelist Christian Collins was re-elected in Tennessee with his party Traditional Voice.

Progressive Green Left

Immediately after the election, Labor Party leader Julian Clarke resigned. The subsequent leadership election was dominated by debate about the party's future in light of its abysmal results and continued decline. The race was ultimately contested between deputy leader Danielle Lee and MCC Jodie Gallagher. Lee supported a return to traditional social democratic politics and a potential caucus with the Alliance. Gallagher, a key figure on the emergent green wing of the party, proposed closer cooperation with the Green Progressives, with a vision of establishing a pan-left political alliance.

Gallagher won the election with 57% of the vote, and sought closer ties with other parties on the left, extending invitations to discuss future relations with several other parties, including the Green Progressives, Radical Socialist Alternative, and a number of minor parties which lacked national representation. Though talks with RSA stalled, Labor and the Green Progressives made a breakthrough, agreeing to create a joint Congressional group and act as equals in leading opposition.

In March 2016, the Labor caucus approved a motion to hold a ballot regarding a merger with the Green Progressives. This was approved by 60% of members. The Green Progressives held a corresponding ballot, which was approved by 83% of members. The merger process officially began on June 1 and was finalised on 1 August; the name selected for the new party was the Progressive & Green Left, though the ampersand was later removed. Former Green Progressive leader Kenna Snow-Newman was elected the first leader of the new party, with Gallagher becoming deputy leader.

The party attracted major attention with a victory in the 2016 Chesapeake state election just two months later, winning 39% of the vote and forming government at its very first election. This was followed by strong performances at elections in Ohio, Appalachia, Virginia, Vermont, Ontario, and Massachusetts throughout 2017; in each, PGL became either the largest or second largest party.

Electoral system

Both the Congressional Assembly and Congressional Council are elected via d'Hondt method proportional representation, with each state acting as a multi-member constituency. The two houses are elected collectively, with a single vote cast by each voter electing members to both houses. The divergence between results in each house is due to the differing processes of apportionment applied in each house:

For the Assembly, seats are delegated to each state based on population, with the number of constituents represented by a single seat being equal to the population of least populous state. In the 2019 election, this was Vermont, population 523,959 as per the 2014 Census.

For the Council, the total number of seats is equal to one half the cube root value of the total American population. In the 2019 election, the size of the Council was 273 seats. Seats are then apportioned between states based on the cube root value of each state's population. Compared to the Assembly, the Council gives greater representation to less populous states and lesser representation to more populous states.

Legislative system

The Congress of the Federation operates on the basis of American bicameralism, in which the two legislative chambers hold significant and near-equal power, with neither house holding formal or conventional precedence over the other. Though the Assembly is considered to be the lower house and the Council considered to be the upper house, this has little legal significance. The Chancellor may sit in either house, and bills of any kind may originate in either house. Traditionally, in the event of a parliamentary deadlock, the Chancellor must hold the confidence of the House in which they sit in order to continue in office.

Date

The Constitution of the Federal Republic states that elections to both houses of Congress must be held simultaneously, and no more than four years after the previous election. Elections may be called early by the President on the advice of the Chancellor, or unilaterally by the President if there is a major constitutional or political conflict preventing the sitting government from operating. Federal elections may be held on any day of the week; the day of the election is designated Election Day and is a public holiday.

The latest possible date for the election was 14 July 2019. On 20 May 2019, Chancellor Campbell approached President Augustine Cruz to request the dissolution of Congress and the scheduling of the election for 10 July.

Parties and leaders

Parties represented in the outgoing Congress at its dissolution were the following:

Name			Ideology		Leader	2015 result			Government
						Votes (%)	Seats
							Assembly	Council
	Civic Action	CA	Liberal conservatism Economic liberalism	Center-right	Eleanor Campbell	33.5%	130 / 311	124 / 273	Coalition government Leading government
	Progressive Green Left	PGL	Green politics Social democracy	Center-left	Kenna Snow-Newman	27.6%*	84 / 311	70 / 273	Opposition
	Popular Constitutional Freedom	PCF	National conservatism American nationalism	Right-wing	Christopher Herrera	13.9%	44 / 311	39 / 273	Coalition government Junior partner
	American Alliance	AA	Liberalism Centrism	Center	Dominic Callahan	14.4%	40 / 311	33 / 273	Opposition
	Radical Socialist Alternative	RSA	Democratic socialism Left-wing populism	Left-wing	Rowan Gomez	6.0%	12 / 311	6 / 273	Opposition
	Traditional Voice	TV	Christian right Christian democracy	Center-right to right-wing	Christian Collins	1.9%	1 / 311	1 / 273	Opposition
* Results for the Green Progressives and Labor Party are aggregated.

Campaign

The official campaign period began on 29 May. As the Fourth of July fell during the campaign period, a three-day campaign blackout took place from 3 to 5 July, during which time no political advertising was permitted. Some criticism was leveled at Chancellor Campbell for scheduling the election so soon after the Fourth of July, though no party leaders publicly expressed disagreement with the timing of the election.

The Civic Action campaign played on the legacy of the long-serving Blackwell government, promising "four more years of stability and prosperity". The party pledged to continue civil reforms and pursue "sensible" economic and social policy. They sought a "middle ground" policy on climate change, encouraging private investment in renewable energy via subsidies and advocating a steady transition away from fossil fuels. Negative campaigning was a major part of Civic Action's campaign, and they strongly opposed the Progressive Green Left's economic, energy, and climate policies, claiming that if elected, PGL would plunge America into a recession worse than Y2K. They also claimed Kenna Snow-Newman was unfit to serve as Chancellor due to her youth and relative inexperience, and highlighted her former membership of the Left Communist Youth, labeling her a "leftist radical". They targeted tensions within PGL resulting from the merger of the Green Progressives and Labor Party, the Progressive Green Left's predecessors, describing the party as an "unholy union". This point of attack was particularly focused on the relationship between Kenna Snow-Newman and Jodie Gallagher, former leaders of the respective parties, who had publicly sparred on several occasions in preceding years. The Civic Action campaign warned that "a feud not seen since McDowell and Weber" could erupt in a PGL government.

The Progressive Green Left campaign sought to energize a broad progressive base, with its central message surrounding immediate and significant action against climate change. Also emphasised were social justice and economic justice, with the party envisioning "a democratic and egalitarian future for America". PGL's federal campaign was complemented by a significant grassroots effort, following similar efforts in state elections over the preceding two years. This element played a significant role in the campaign, with supporters promoting PGL especially strongly on social media. The phrases "green wave" and "paint it green", which were coined by PGL supporters during the party's state election campaigns, were frequently repeated at PGL rallies and during candidates' speeches. The campaign denounced "climate deniers" in the incumbent government, particularly criticising Civic Action's coalition with Popular Constitutional Freedom, whose leader Christopher Herrera had publicly denied the existence of climate change on several occasions. After deputy Civic Action leader Mathias Mckinney's appearance in the second leaders' debate, the campaign intensified its focus on climate denial and conservatism within Civic Action, accusing Campbell of hypocrisy for claiming to support climate action while serving with a deputy who described himself as a climate skeptic.

Popular Constitutional Freedom, fearing loss of social conservatives to Traditional Voice, strongly appealed to its Southern base. The party also sought to appeal to northern working-class voters, particularly in the Midwest, seeking to exploit a perceived vacuum in the political landscape left by the absence of the Labor Party. American Alliance focused on defending its 2015 gains with middle-class voters in the north and Northeast. The Radical Socialist Alliance attempted to further build its urban working-class base, though candidates in rural states such as Kaskaskia and Superior appealed to the tradition of the agrarian left, styling themselves "progressive socialists". Traditional Voice appealed to social conservatives and Christian traditionalists in the South, though a particularly spirited campaign was run in Ohio by candidate Thomas Thompson. Democratic Future ran a campaign centered on anti-corruption, particularly targeting parts of the South which had suffered recent corruption scandals. Regionalist party the Florida Democrats also campaigned strongly in the Floridas, seeking greater autonomy for the region and stronger rights for Spanish Floridians.

Debates

Main article: Miasma

Five major debates were hosted by public broadcasters during the campaign, regulated by the Federal Debate and Forum Authority. Two major leaders' debates were hosted by the FBCA, while the Republican Press Network hosted two deputy leaders' debates as well as the final debate of the campaign, a "Chancellor candidate" debate contested by Chancellor Campbell and Progressive Green Left leader Snow-Newman.

An independent climate debate hosted by the Alliance for the Climate Emergency, held on June 19, unexpectedly became the second most-widely watched debate of the campaign, beating out both the first and second leaders' debates. Attended by Snow-Newman, Alliance leader Dominic Callahan, and RSA leader Rowan Gomez, the debate explored a number of topics relating broadly to climate change. The organisers stated they intended to invite "every party with belief in climate change", specifically excluding Popular Constitutional Freedom and Traditional Voice. Chancellor Campbell declined the invitation, and Civic Action also turned down a second offer for any serving minister to attend the debate. Broadcast on the Santana-Young Network between 7:30 PM and 9:00 PM ET, the debate captured over a quarter of television viewershare during its broadcast period, much higher than predicted. Internet uploads of the debate on various platforms aggregated an estimated 160,000,000 views over the course of the campaign, making the climate debate the most-viewed in history.

Chancellor Campbell was notably absent from the second leaders' debate, held on June 28; she stated she was unable to attend but did not disclose why. Civic Action was represented instead by deputy leader Mathias Mckinney, who also featured in both deputy leaders' debates.

2019 American federal election debates
Date	Organiser	Invitees	P  Present   S  Surrogate   NI  Non-invitee  A  Absent invitee						Audience
			CA	PGL	PCF	AA	RSA	TV
7 June	FBCA	Party leaders	P Campbell	P Snow-Newman	P Herrera	P Callahan	P Gomez	P Collins	16.0%
14 June	RPN	Deputy leaders	P Mckinney	P Gallagher	P Grant	P Patel	P Calhoun	NI	9.0%
19 June	ACE, EarthFuture, American Voice	Party leaders	A	P Snow-Newman	NI	P Callahan	P Gomez	NI	25.8%
28 June	FBCA	Party leaders	S Mckinney	P Snow-Newman	P Herrera	P Callahan	P Gomez	P Collins	23.1%
2 July	RPN	Deputy leaders	P McKinney	P Gallagher	P Grant	P Patel	P Calhoun	NI	18.2%
6 July	RPN	Party leaders	P Campbell	P Snow-Newman	NI	NI	NI	NI	40.3%

Reception and analysis

The Progressive Green Left campaign was labeled one of the most successful in decades. A survey of 55 political analysts found that 76% believed PGL had conducted the most effective campaign, while an APS poll conducted during Fourth of July campaign blackout found that 52% of respondents agreed that PGL's campaign had been the strongest. Strong positive messaging, a clear and consistent vision, and Kenna Snow-Newman's effective personal role in the campaign were cited as strengths by several sources. Snow-Newman was particularly praised for her debate performances, with polling showing voters considered her the victor in all four. Her oration was praised, with NNT reporter Taylor Saunders describing her as "a commanding presence" and "possibly the greatest speaker in politics since [Chancellor] Vincent." PGL deputy Jodie Gallagher also received praise; after the second deputy leaders' debate, the New York Times wrote "the public will be assured that, despite the messy origins of their political marriage, Snow-Newman and Gallagher will make an effective team should the Green Left win the election." Some sources criticised aspects of the campaign, with Jabari Larson of Kennedy describing it as "populist" and drawing parallels to PCF's 1998 campaign, though he did not deny its effectiveness. Others also expressed doubts about the feasibility of many of PGL's proposals, especially if forced to negotiate legislation with Alliance.

Civic Action's campaign was described as "largely ineffective" by leading commentator Arthur Collier. Some aspects were praised, including its focus on Snow-Newman's youth and inexperience and criticisms of PGL's ambitious economic proposals, particularly its complex climate response plan. Civic Action's appeals to American Alliance voters were also praised. However, much discussion of the campaign was critical. Columnist Patrick Meyer criticised its pervasive negative messaging, stating that it was unlikely most voters would buy into such rhetoric. The Atlanta Star stated that Civic Action's campaign was "edging into fearmongering territory." Others questioned the party's vision for the future, with Taylor Saunders stating "Civic Action's policy plans appear to lack any concrete solutions to the problems of modern America, especially when compared to the Green Left's veritable barrage of ideas." Criticism was leveled toward Chancellor Campbell personally for her limited role in the campaign; particularly, her attendance of just two of the four debates to which she received invitation. Emphasis was placed on her refusal to attend the June 19 climate debate, which was later described by political analyst Harriet Espinoza as "the nail in the coffin for Civic Action's campaign", while columnist Patrick Meyer wrote "[Campbell] had the chance to turn around the entire narrative of the campaign, and she threw it away." Campbell's performances in the debates was also criticised; Arthur Collier contrasted her poor oration and lack of presence on stage with the 2015 campaign. Civic Action deputy Mathias Mckinney, a noted conservative and self-described climate skeptic, was widely characterised as a negative influence on Civic Action's campaign, particularly in his role as Campbell's replacement during the second leaders' debate. After the debate, Taylor Saunders wrote "Snow-Newman was able to effectively counter and shut down most of Mckinney's points, leaving him helpless on several occasions." Harriet Espinoza stated "Civic Action's chief representative [at the debate] flirting with climate denial at this stage of the campaign is self-evidently disastrous."

Popular Constitutional Freedom's targeting of the working-class vote was praised by Jabari Larson, who speculated that "a segment of Labor's traditional voting base may find themselves seduced by Herrera's evergreen nativist rhetoric." However, most analysts concluded that PCF's campaign had little impact on its target audience. American Alliance's campaign was assessed mostly negatively; Harriet Espinoza wrote "Alliance and Callahan responded sluggishly and ineffectively to PGL's strategies, and were bleeding votes from the very start." Radical Socialist Alternative's campaign was credited with limiting its losses in the election, as many sources had predicted many RSA voters would switch to PGL. Though Traditional Voice's national campaign failed to deliver predicted gains, the Ohio campaign was described as "highly successful" by the Cincinnati Daily. Arthur Collier stated "Thompson's message resonated with rural voters, who rewarded him with a single precious seat". Democratic Future made the second-largest gains in the election behind PGL, which RPN reporter Alfie Bell attributed to its anti-establishment campaign. Much of its new support was drawn from disillusioned Alliance voters, particularly in the South and Northeast.

Opinion polling

Main article: Miasma

Final-day polls

The following polls were conducted on 8–9 July.

Firm	Fieldwork date	CA	PGL	PCF	AA	RSA	TV	DF	Other	Lead
Ameripoll	9 July 2019	24.5	40.5	11.0	8.5	4.5	3.5	5.0	2.5	16.0
T-MS Polling	9 July 2019	24.0	42.5	10.0	8.0	4.5	4.0	5.0	2.0	18.5
FBCA	8–9 July 2019	25.0	43.0	9.5	9.0	4.0	4.0	4.5	1.0	18.0
RPN	8–9 July 2019	25.0	40.0	12.0	7.5	5.5	3.5	4.5	2.0	15.0
Union Statistics	8–9 July 2019	23.0	44.0	10.0	8.0	6.0	3.0	4.0	1.0	19.0
RPN	8 July 2019	23.5	42.0	14.0	7.5	4.5	3.0	4.0	1.5	18.5
APS	8 July 2019	26.0	41.0	11.0	6.5	4.5	4.0	5.0	2.5	15.0
The Lawson Office	8 July 2019	23.0	43.5	12.5	9.0	3.5	3.0	4.0	1.5	20.5

Exit polls

The following polls were conducted as exit polls on the day of the election. The exit polls projected the results for the Congressional Assembly, with all three predicting a Progressive Green Left victory.

Firm	Fieldwork date	CA	PGL	PCF	AA	RSA	TV	DF	Other	Lead	Projection
FBCA–RPN–APS	10 July 2019	24.7 85–90	42.1 152–159	11.5 32–36	7.3 11–16	4.8 6–7	3.1 1–2	5.0 4–6	1.5 0	17.4	Possible PGL majority
FBCA–Union–T-MS	10 July 2019	25.1 85–91	42.4 155–163	11.1 30–34	7.0 12–17	5.3 6–9	3.4 1–2	4.6 4–6	1.1 0	17.3	Likely PGL majority
RPN–Ameripoll–TLO	10 July 2019	25.0 86–93	41.3 150–158	12.2 35–38	7.7 13–16	5.8 7–10	2.8 1	3.8 3–5	1.4 0	16.3	Likely PGL minority

Results

The Progressive Green Left held a commanding lead in terms of popular vote, 17.3 points nationally, winning pluralities in all 33 states and majorities in several. This led to significant overrepresentation in the results, granting them a majority of seats in both houses of Congress. PGL performed strongest in the Northeast and Northwest, underperforming in traditionally left-leaning industrial areas in the Midwest, and performing better than expected in Kentucky and Virginia. The party did relatively poorly in the South, but nonetheless won over 35% of the vote in all but two states – Alabama and Kanawha.

Jodie Gallagher, former Labor Party leader and the leader of the Progressive Green Left group in the Congressional Council prior to the election, was elected Chairperson of the Council at the first sitting of Congress.

Results of the 2019 Rhenish general election
Party		Constituency			Overseas			Leveling seats	Total seats	+/–
		Votes	%	Seats	Votes	%	Seats
	United Republic Party	2,380,505	24.67	56	130,894	39.60	1	5	62	−2
	Rhenish National Party	1,927,012	19.97	41	22,843	6.91	0	9	50	−8
	Republican Socialist Alliance	1,410,855	14.62	29	31,960	9.67	0	7	36	−2
	Radical Party	1,261,177	13.07	25	93,002	28.14	1	7	33	+9
	United Radical Left	1,154,040	11.96	23	10,705	3.24	0	7	30	−1
	German People's Front	768,803	7.97	16	41,129	12.44	0	4	20	+5
	The Ecologists	357,622	3.71	2	Did not run			7	9	+1
	Rhenish Centre Party	281,362	2.92	3	Did not run			4	7	−2
	Others	109,697	1.14	0	–	–	–	0	0	±0
Total		9,651,073	100	195	330,533	100	2	50	247	±0
Registered voters/turnout		11,514,551	83.82	–	832,102	39.72	–	–	–	–

Party		Votes	%	Assembly		Council		Assembly Council
				Seats	+/–	Seats	+/–
	Progressive Green Left	40,187,087	41.9	159	75	146	76
	Civic Action	23,613,652	24.6	89	41	79	45
	Popular Constitutional Freedom	10,997,219	11.5	33	11	33	6
	American Alliance	7,250,512	7.6	14	26	8	26
	Radical Socialist Alternative	5,181,232	5.4	8	4	4	2
	Democratic Future	4,652,709	4.9	6	6	2	2
	Traditional Voice	2,909,754	3.0	2	1	1	0
	Others	1,223,878	1.3	0	0	0	0
Total		96,026,043	100	311	–	273	–
Registered voters/turnout		123,687,764	77.6	–	–	–	–

Popular vote PGL   41.85% CA   24.59% PCF   11.45% AA   7.55% RSA   5.40% DF   4.85% TV   3.03% Others   1.28%

Congressional Assembly seats PGL   51.13% CA   28.62% PCF   10.61% AA   4.50% RSA   2.57% DF   1.93% TV   0.64%

Congressional Council seats PGL   53.48% CA   28.94% PCF   12.09% AA   2.93% RSA   1.47% DF   0.73% TV   0.37%

Aftermath

The FBCA, RPN, SYN, and NNT had all called the election for the Progressive Green Left by 18:45 ET on the evening of 10 July. The Sentinel, America Votes, and Southern Journal had all called it by 19:00.

At 19:30, Chancellor Campbell appeared at the Civic Action party function in Annapolis. Conceding defeat, she announced her immediate resignation as party leader and from Congress. She emphasised the successes of her government, including strides toward international climate action, economic prosperity, political stability, and numerous civil and government reforms. Directly addressing former Chancellor Alexander Blackwell, who was not attending the event, Campbell apologized for ending his legacy with a landslide defeat. Addressing Chancellor-presumptive Snow-Newman, she gave her best wishes, stating "the Chancellery can be an impossibly difficult office, but those with heart for it will rise to the occasion."

Soon after the conclusion of Campbell's speech, Kenna Snow-Newman claimed victory before a crowd at a party rally in her hometown of Cambridge, Chesapeake. Thanking the outgoing Chancellor for her blessings, Snow-Newman praised PGL staff and volunteers who had worked on the campaign. She proclaimed a new era for America, declaring: "we're always stronger when we stand united. This movement and this result proves that. Tomorrow, our work begins in earnest. We have the chance to show the world that a better world, a brighter world, is possible. We have the chance to build it – together." She concluded her speech by quoting Howard Atkins's "a future to believe in" speech.

Snow-Newman was sworn in as the 30th Chancellor on 11 July. The Snow-Newman cabinet was sworn in on 13 July.

Election Valentina Schulman (PVR)
Ballot →		21 August
Required majority →		124 out of 247 Y
	Yes • PVR (62) • Radical (33) • VRL (30)	125 / 247
	No • RNP (50) • RSA (36) • DVF (20) • Ecologists (9) • RZP (7)	122 / 247
	Abstentions	0 / 247
	Absentees	0 / 247

Reaction

Russian President Alyona Korotkina, Louisiane Prime Minister Jean-Baptiste Verninac, British General-Secretary Darius Bradley, and German President Edelbert Hennig all congratulated Snow-Newman on her victory on the night of the election. Leaders and officials from numerous other nations issued statements of congratulation in the following days, including French foreign minister Loïc Grandis, which was seen as an indication of improving Franco-American relations.

The Progressive Green Left's victory was described as "the greatest political comeback in living memory" by the New York Times. Journalist Zachary Wong wrote "after almost twenty years lost in the wilderness, and sustaining a seemingly mortal wound in 2015, Labor's spiritual return to power may already have surpassed Blackwell's resurrection of the Vincent tradition on the list of American political milestones". Kieran Cardenas described "a potent mixture of new faces, modern policy, and world-class campaigning" as the cause of the stunning victory. Analyst Maxime Duval examined the party's campaign and public image strategy, praising it as "the gold standard of public relations ... irresistible even to the Green Left's staunchest opponents."

The result of the election was seen as a return to two-party politics, ending the multi-party system which had existed since 1998. Commentator Tommy Taylor claimed that the overwhelming media focus on the two largest parties stifled diversity of opinion and harmed the performance of minor parties.

The election ignited a debate regarding the American electoral system, as the PGL won a majority of seats in both houses of Congress with only 42% of the vote. Shortly after taking office, Chancellor Snow-Newman acknowledged that the result was "not exactly proportional", and stated the government would consider reform to the electoral system.

Parties and leaders

Parties represented in the outgoing Congress at its dissolution were the following:

Parties and leaders

Name			Ideology		Leader	1947 result		Government
						Votes (%)	Seats
	Monarchist Alliance	AM	National conservatism Monarchism	Centre-right	Roberto Lucifero d'Aprigliano	22.76%	101 / 439	Coalition government Leading government
	Workers Socialist Party	PSO	Socialism Democratic socialism	Centre-left to left	Gaetano Salvemini	17.92%	79 / 439	Opposition
	Duosicilian People's Party	PPD	Christian democracy Popularism	Centre	Mario Scelba	14.34%	63 / 439	Coalition government Junior partner
	Communist Party of Two Sicilies	PCDS	Communism Marxism-Leninism	Left to extreme left	Fausto Gullo	11.14%	49 / 439	Opposition
	Common Man's Front	FUQ	Populism Big tent	Centre-right to Right-wing	Guglielmo Giannini	10.16%	45 / 439	Coalition government Junior partner
	Liberal Party	PL	Liberalism Liberal socialism	Centre to centre-left	Ugo La Malfa	9.82%	43 / 439	Opposition
	Reformers Party	PR	Liberalism Economic liberalism	Centre to centre-right	TBD
	Duosicilian Republican Party	PRD	Republicanism Liberal socialism	Center-left	Eduardo Di Giovanni	5.01%	22 / 439	Opposition
	National Democracy	DN	National conservatism Monarchism	Right-wing	Alfredo Covelli	3.72%	16 / 439	Coalition government Junior partner
	Movement for the Independence of Sicily	MIS	Settimism Sicilian nationalism	Centre to centre-right	Andrea Finocchiaro Aprile	2.84%	13 / 439	Opposition
	TBD	TBD	Settimism Democratic socialism	Centre-left	Antonino Varvaro
	Unionist Party	PU	Federalism Italian unification	Centre to centre-right	Ernesto Rossi	1.83%	8 / 439	Opposition

Background

The 1944 Duosicilian general election was held on Sunday, 25 March 1945, to elect the National Constituent Assembly of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies. All 439 seats in the National Constituent Assembly were up for election.

After Mussolini's Prime Minister of Kingdom of Italy After the liberation of Naples in September 1943, King Ferdinand III and the government-in-exile flew back to Naples from his exile in Dublin, Ireland. Immediately after his return, the pressure from the press, the trade unions, the capitalists and the allied nations such as the United States and the United Kingdom for the cancellation of the laws imposed by the fascist regime increased, so King Ferdinand III appointed former Interior minister and anti separatist Salvatore Aldisio as Prime Minister as a first step towards restoring democracy in the kingdom.

Finally, while the Allies were marching towards Florence during the summer of 1944, the King called for a

Results

← Summary of the 25 May 1947 Two Sicilies National Assembly election results →

Party		Votes	%	Seats
	Monarchist Alliance	1,541,441	22.76	101
	Workers Socialist Party	1,213,815	17.92	79
	Duosicilian People's Party	971,425	14.34	63
	Communist Party of Two Sicilies	754,711	11.14	49
	Common Man's Front	688,110	10.16	45
	Democratic Reformers Party	665,036	9.82	43
	Duosicilian Republican Party	339,116	5.01	22
	National Democracy	251,886	3.72	16
	Movement for the Independence of Sicily	192,526	2.84	13
	Unionist Party	124,159	1.83	8
	Farmers and Peasants Party	3,265	0.05	0
	Others	28,410	0.42	0
Invalid/blank votes		128,634	–	–
Total		6,773,899	100	439
Registered voters/turnout		8,019,219	84.47	–
Source: Ministry of Interior

Popular vote AM   20.64% PSO   17.66% PPD   17.05% PCDS   11.29% PDR   9.32% FUQ   8.35% DN   5.06% PRD   4.84% MIS   2.85% PU   2.51% PAC   0.26% Others   0.16%

Parliamentary seats AM   20.73% PSO   17.77% PPD   17.08% PCDS   11.39% PDR   9.34% FUQ   8.43% DN   5.01% PRD   4.78% MIS   2.73% PU   2.51% PAC   0.23%

List of Prime Ministers of the Kingdom of Two Sicilies

https://www.schemecolor.com/sample?getcolor=009ce2 https://lslwiki.digiworldz.com/lslwiki/wakka.php?wakka=color

Members

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categoria:Deputati_dell%27Assemblea_Costituente_della_Repubblica_Italiana (B) Carlo Bassano

Communists:

• Giuseppe Di Vittorio
• Mario Assennato

Socialists:

• Oreste Lizzadri (leader in 1953?)
• Francesco Cacciatore (leader from 1957)
• Francesco De Martino
• Riccardo Lombardi (Popular Socialist)
• Gaetano Salvemini
• Eduardo Di Giovanni

Republicans: (social democrats, PSDI?)

Populars:

• Giorgio La Pira (segretario alle prossime elezioni?)
• Mario Scelba (against to any cabinet with socialists)
• Gennaro Cassiani
• Giuseppe Spataro
• Salvatore Aldisio
• Gaspare Ambrosini
• Giuseppe Alessi
• Bernardo Mattarella

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milazzismo

• Paolo D'Antoni
• Silvio Milazzo

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partito_Democratico_del_Lavoro_(Italia)

• Enrico Molè

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regno_del_Sud

Liberals:

• Ugo La Malfa
• Francesco De Vita
• Girolamo Bellavista
• Guido Basile
• Epicarmo Corbino (economista)
• Giovanni Selvaggi (PRI)
• Giuseppe Nitti (PLI)
• Gaetano Martino (PLI, 1954)
• Antonio Martino (1988, PLI)
• Raffaele De Caro (1954, PLI)

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unione_Democratica_Nazionale

Unionists: (federalists)

• Ernesto Rossi
• Ugo Damiani

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categoria:Federalisti

Independentists:

• Attilio Castrogiovanni
• Francesco Musotto (moderato filoseparatista)
• Antonino Varvaro (comunista agrario)
• Carlo Ardizzoni (giornalista, ex Sindaco di Catania, moderato di csx)

http://www.ars.sicilia.it/node/1144 http://www.ars.sicilia.it/i-legislatura http://danilocaruso.blogspot.com/2015/09/andrea-finocchiaro-aprile.html https://www.fancityacireale.it/wordpress2/piccola-storia-di-jaci-le-elezioni-regionali-siciliane-anno-1947/ http://www.regione.toscana.it/documents/10180/452241/Le%20elezioni%20politiche%20spagole%20del%209%20marzo%202008/55271067-5bd9-4b6e-8d93-24d27f5cabc7 http://www.ars.sicilia.it/sites/default/files/downloads/2018-10/Archivio%20storico%20del%20Parlamento%20regionale.pdf http://www.trapaninostra.it/libri/Centro_Studi_Giulio_Pastore/Breve_viaggio_nel_mondo_separatista_trapanese/Breve_viaggio_nel_mondo_separatista_trapanese.pdf Il leader meridionalista siciliano Enzo Maiorano è stato un precursore: molto vicino a Roberto Calderoli già nel 2004

Monarchists:

• Carmine De Martino (?)

https://storia.camera.it/deputato/carmine-de-martino-18980306

• Camillo Tommasi di Scillato
• Roberto Lucifero (liberal-monarchico di origini calabresi)
• Achille Lauro (democristiano)
• Alfredo Covelli (poi autore della fusione con il MSI)
• Gaetano Fiorentino (poi nel MSI)

Nationalists:

Neofascists:

• Alfredo Cucco

Common Man's Frontists:

• Giuseppe Ayroldi
• Vincenzo Tieri (successivo segretario)

Farmers and Peasants Party

Independents

• Igino Coffari
• Vito Reale

Aftermath

Election Roberto Lucifero d'Aprigliano (AM)
Ballot →		19 June
Required majority →		220 out of 439 Y
	Yes • AM (99) • PPD (63) • FUQ (45) • DN (16)	223 / 439
	No • PSO (79) • PCDS (49) • PDR (43) • PRD (22) • MIS (13) • PU (8)	214 / 439
	Abstentions • AM (2)	2 / 439
	Absentees	0 / 439

Opinion polling

Idee per la timeline alternativa: Austria e Borbone sono alleati fin dal 1815 con la Santa Alleanza, gli austriaci aiutano a sedare la rivolta siciliana del 1848 ma la neutralità dell'Austria durante la Guerra di Crimea fa sì che i russi propongano di diventare i nuovi alleati dei siciliani.

Ciò portò all'istituzione del sistema del Congresso, e ai successivi congressi: i più importanti saranno quelli di Aquisgrana (1818), di Troppau (1820), di Lubiana (1821), che autorizzò l'intervento austriaco nel napoletano, e infine il congresso di Verona (1822) già citato.

Valutare se intervennero durante la Guerra di Crimea vista la presenza del Regno di Sardegna 1856 - la Russia e Napoli stringono l'alleanza 1861 - Ferdinando

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congresso_di_Vienna#La_Santa_Alleanza https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impero_austriaco

Institute	Date	CDU	SPD	Grüne	FDP	Linke	AfD	Others
2019 state election	27 October 2019	21.7 %	8.2 %	5.2 %	5.0 %	31.0 %	23.4 %	5.1 %
INSA	6 February 2020	19 %	06 %	6 %	7 %	34 %	23 %	5 %
Forsa	7 February 2020	12 %	09 %	7 %	4 %	37 %	24 %	7 %
Infratest dimap	10 February 2020	13 %	10 %	5 %	4 %	39 %	24 %	5 %
INSA	14 February 2020	14 %	07 %	6 %	4 %	40 %	25 %	4 %