User:Bigbuddos/Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

Flynn, Katherine E. 2007. "Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins 1863-1938." Legacy.^[1]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. This journal takes a close look at Kelley-Hawkins's work, ancestry, and life.
Harris, Jennifer. 2006. "Black Like?: The Strange Case of Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins." African American Review.^[2]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. This journal examines Kelley-Hawkins's race and life.
Foreman, P.G. & Sherrard-Johnson, C. 2007. "Racial Recovery, Racial Death: An Introduction in Four Parts." Legacy.^[3]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. This journal examines Kelley-Hawkins's racial identity and how it has influenced her work.
Jarrett, Gene Andrew. 2007. "Addition by Subtraction: Toward a Literary History of Racial Representation." Legacy.^[4]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. This journal discusses Kelley-Hawkins's race and whether or not her work should be removed from the canon of black women's literature.
Selections from the collections: African American history in Special Collections. 2004. University of Florida.^[5]
- This is a book of special collections from the University of Florida, so it should be a reliable source. There is not a lot of information pertaining to Kelley-Hawkins, but there is a small section dedicated to her and one of her novels.
Jackson, Holly. 2007. "Identifying Emma Dunham Kelley: Rethinking Race and Authorship." Cambridge University Press.^[6]
- This is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal, so it should be a reliable source. This journal examines Kelley-Hawkins's race and authorship.

References

^ Flynn, Katherine E (2007). "Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins 1863-1938". Legacy. 24 (2): 278–293 – via ProQuest.
^ Harris, Jennifer (2006). "Black Like?: The Strange Case of Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins". African American Review. 40 (3): 401–419 – via EBSCOhost.
^ 1. Foreman 2. Sherrard-Johnson, 1. P Gabrielle 2. Cherene (2007). "Racial Recovery, Racial Death: An Introduction in Four Parts". Legacy. 24 (2): 157–170 – via ProQuest.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
^ Jarrett, Gene Andrew (2007). "Addition by Subtraction: Toward a Literary History of Racial Representation". Legacy. 24 (2): 315–321 – via ProQuest.
^ "UF Digital Collections". ufdc.ufl.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-28.
^ Jackson, Holly (2007). "Identifying Emma Dunham Kelley: Rethinking Race and Authorship". PMLA. 122 (3): 728–741. ISSN 0030-8129.

[1] Flynn, Katherine E (2007). "Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins 1863-1938". Legacy. 24 (2): 278–293 – via ProQuest.

[2] Harris, Jennifer (2006). "Black Like?: The Strange Case of Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins". African American Review. 40 (3): 401–419 – via EBSCOhost.

[3] 1. Foreman 2. Sherrard-Johnson, 1. P Gabrielle 2. Cherene (2007). "Racial Recovery, Racial Death: An Introduction in Four Parts". Legacy. 24 (2): 157–170 – via ProQuest.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[4] Jarrett, Gene Andrew (2007). "Addition by Subtraction: Toward a Literary History of Racial Representation". Legacy. 24 (2): 315–321 – via ProQuest.

[5] "UF Digital Collections". ufdc.ufl.edu. Retrieved 2022-10-28.

[6] Jackson, Holly (2007). "Identifying Emma Dunham Kelley: Rethinking Race and Authorship". PMLA. 122 (3): 728–741. ISSN 0030-8129.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]