Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
Unfortunately (Or excitingly, because it means I have the opportunity to make a new Wikipedia page!) there is no page for Iron Superoxide Dismutase. However, the page about Superoxide Dismutase, in general, is rather focused. I found it very informative.
Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
I saw no bias in this article.
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
I'm not sure what kind of viewpoints would be appropriate in this article. It is more based on scientific fact and less on an event or a publication, etc.
Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
The sources that I examined seemed to be pretty good. I do wish the page relied more on primary literature. Although reviews are an easier option, because they are conglomerates of primary literature, giving the first source is usually more reliable.
Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
This page seems to rely mostly on scientific journals/books/reviews. I did not notice any biased sources.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
This page was first made in 2016, and the subject itself is relatively new. Based on what I know about superoxide dismutase, I did not see anything that raised a red flag. In fact, I'm curious about the other aspects, about the uses in cosmetic industry and commercial sources, that don't relate specifically to my molecule.
Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
These edits seem to be very harsh. However, they mostly have very good insight. The edits have to do with formatting, style, specificity, and adding citations. I agree that the article could use improving. It is far from perfect and could be more detailed. I wish there was more about my molecule.
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
This article is a part of the WikiProject Molecular and Cell Biology, it is C-Class and is of low importance. It is also part of WikiProject Biophysics and is a B-Class and low importance.
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
We have not discussed this subject in class thus far.
