User:Aubreeaucoin/sandbox

In 1968, Anne Koedt published "The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm" in a journal titled Notes from the First Year.The journal also included other pieces written by radical feminists living in New York at that time. In the article, Koedt challenges the meaning of sexual pleasure for women in what she understands to be a male dominated society and how female sexuality is understood in a variety of fields. The article begins by arguing that it is not possible for a woman to orgasm vaginally at all and instead only clitoral orgasm is possible.This argument, while agreeing with the notion of frigidity; what men define as a woman's inability to achieve an orgasm vaginally, contradicts the male assumption that vaginal orgasm is possible at all. Koedt goes on to argue that the psychological stand point on the topic of female orgasm does not favor women and the refusal to reassess the definition of frigidity has led to "experts" wrongfully diagnosing women concerned with their supposed inability to vaginally orgasm, as failing to adjust to their role as women.

Koedt's article sparked a frenzy of responses with opinions ranging from total agreement to total dismissal. The University of Pittsburgh published a response by a student disagreeing with Koedt's article due to her generalization of women and lack of credible sources on the subject. The response argues that "The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm" is disrespectful and demeaning to all women. A comment that justifies the students' dismay made by Koedt in her article says that “because of the lack of knowledge of their own anatomy, some women accept the idea that an orgasm felt during “normal” intercourse was vaginally caused” (4-5 Koedt). According to the response article, Koedt's view insinuates that women are uneducated about their anatomy and its functions and in result, are incapable of deciphering their physical feelings.

Abortion Rally Speech

In New York during the year of 1968, Koedt gave a speech addressing the lack of input women have over their own fate, namely the act of getting an abortion. Throughout the speech, she makes several attacks on the American ideal that women are to be willingly passive to men and thus not only allow the male law makers decide what is appropriate to do with her body, but to be okay with those decisions regardless of her own opinion on the subject. In her own words:

"So: we must say to those bishops and pompous lawmakers and self-righteous men, we will no longer be shoved around. We will no longer submit to your definition of whet we should or should not be or do, to become truly feminine in your eyes. For unless we have a part in creating the laws which govern our fate, then we will refuse to follow those dictates and laws,"

Koedt disputes the societal notion that women are only of relevance in terms of their relationship to men and informs men that this concept will no longer be tolerated.

Effect on the Feminist Community

Anne Koedt was a part of many groups that helped to enlighten and better understand women not only emotionally, but as well as physically. As a woman that stood up for female rights, Anne's views even prior to her publications made her a part of the feminist sexual revolution. Like many people that wanted change in life, she saw that the barriers that society held against women were unacceptable. One of Anne Koedt's main influences on the feminist community was her article "The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm." This article was passed around by women in the country. In this article Koedt took a stand that shocked many women stating that the penis has no relation to the female orgasm. She also advocated that the female orgasm had largely to do with psychology. This idea led many to advocate for celibacy and to believe that lesbian sexual interactions are more meaningful than heterosexual interactions.

Koedt founded NYRF with a woman named Shulamith Firestone. NYRF stands for a group called New York Radical Feminists. The driving force of this group was the idea that men purposely establish power over women to help feed their own egos. Women against this principle gathered together to inform other women and try to put a stop to what they believed to be an injustice to women. Koedt and Shulamith ended in 1970 ended up leaving the group they founded do to unsettled differences over leadership roles in the group.