User:Ariellet/sandbox
Rhetorical Analysis Answers
[edit]Strengths:
[edit]- The lead section is very strong. It provides enough background and definition for basic understanding.
- There are eight categories of this article. They are all thorough and two of them include subheadings that get more specific and in-depth.
- The article is well balanced. Some parts in the History section, specifically "Black women and the Civil Rights Movement", are shorter than other parts. But the article still manages to give enough detail about every important aspect of Black feminism.
- For the most part, the coverage is neutral.
- With the exception of a few Huffington Post articles, all of the references are scholarly.
Weaknesses:
[edit]- The overuse of the word "argue(s)" makes the editors sound more subjective than objective
- There are minor grammar mistakes and some irrelevant "See Also" links
- There is some current information missing
- The origin and history section should be developed more before the "Later 20th Century"
Questions:
[edit]4. Black feminism was started by a user named Kamicone on November 26th, 2005. Kamicone provided thirteen sentences on the "current incarnation" that is Black feminism. Under the two paragraphs, Kamicone listed two credible references. On January 16, 2007, Cantaire87 added four short sections called, "What is Black Feminism?", "Current Black Feminism", "Alice Walker's Black Feminism" and "Pat Parker". Tazmaniacs began adding to the Suggested Readings in April 2008. Around 2010 more sections started being added by Mark Ironie. The last recent edits were made this March 30th by Oywiththepoodlesalready, they added a citation to the "Examples" subheading of Black feminist literature.
5. The talk page has not been used since December of last year. Before that, there are sporatic short conversations during 2008, 2011, 2012 and 2015. There has not been constant dialogue. There are some critiques about the differences between White Feminism and Black feminism and African feminism and Black feminism. One user copied a portion of a javascript automated peer review of the article in 2008. I do see some of the same editors from the history page. But most of the editors that added to the mainspace are not on the Talk page.
Edits:
[edit]- Fixed minor grammar errors
Nasty Women Movement Section Drafts
[edit]Origin:
[edit]On October 20, 2016, during the final presidential debate, Hillary Clinton explained to the audience her plans to improve the Social Security program. Shortly after she finished her thought, Donald Trump uttered, "Such a nasty woman." His comment sparked an immediate reaction on various social media platforms, with the biggest being Twitter.
This is a user sandbox of Ariellet. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |