User:Andikaylynn
 | This user is a student editor in Texas_AM/Technical_Editing_(Spring_2018). |
Good Articles vs. Needs Improvement
[edit]- has a banner listing things that need to be looked at
- additional citations
- original research
- in-text citations are missing
- recent revisions focused on making the content more accurate and adding citations
- compared to good articles, this one is not organized very well and the headings could be better
- it has a story-telling tone to some of the information
- some of the sections need more information
- many of the sections are just bulleted lists instead of informative content
- On the talk page, people discussed issues with the structure of the article, the focus of the article, adding references, topics that should be removed, and a lot of discussion on the thunderstorm section
- The most recent revisions were based on tagging sources
- I think there has been some good progress made, but I think the organization of the content could still be improved
- Some of the information is contradictory to the definition provided for what qualifies severe weather
- The explanation for what causes severe weather does not consider weather not associated with thunderstorms
Andikaylynn (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Article Revision Proposals
[edit]Andikaylynn (talk) 06:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)