User:Adolfo79

Evaluate article content by answering the following questions:

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes, everything posted has a place and a purpose within the article.
• Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? No information seems out of place in the article. However acknowledgement of African and native oral tradition should be acknowledge.
• What else could be improved? Showing more of the history of the practices of Oral Tradition as well as examples of oral tradition.

Evaluate the article's tone by answering the following questions:

• Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral as far as facts based the is no concern able bias.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The eastern views such as their religious views and the culture are massively over represented while other such as African, Native Americans, etc. aren't acknowledge at all by the article. This undermines the article as one for Oral Tradition instead making it a article for eastern oral tradition.

Evaluating the article's sources by answering the following questions:

• Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links work and they do support the article and provide a deeper background knowledge.
• Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? The articles are all appropriate and reliable coming from neutral sources that are produced by actual researchers.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There were suggestions of merging oral history and literature into one article which became a topic of discussion that ended up being voted against.
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? The article is rated as a Start Class article and is a part of Anthropology, folklore,and religion Wiki projects.