User:Aaron Liu/sandbox/RSP Demo
- Hi. We're so happy you wanted to visit to learn as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think this floor plan might be helpful to you as you get started. We've made it an NFT, so it'll be totally impossible for you to piccyfy it and leak it to our awful enemy, Sonic Youth. Enjoy!
- Full list of sources ≤ニニニニ You Are Here, Homesáfe.
- Transcluded subpage A
- Transcluded subpage B
- Deprecated sources, transcluded from subpages
- Hi. We're so happy you wanted to visit to learn as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think this floor plan might be helpful to you as you get started. We've made it an NFT, so it'll be totally impossible for you to piccyfy it and leak it to our awful enemy, Sonic Youth. Enjoy!
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Uses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary
| |||
| China Global Television Network (CGTN, CCTV International) WP:CGTN 📌 |
|
 2020
|
2020 |
China Global Television Network was deprecated in the 2020 RfC for publishing false or fabricated information. Many editors consider CGTN a propaganda outlet, and some editors express concern over CGTN's airing of forced confessions. | 1  
|
| 112 Ukraine | 
|
2019  2020 2020
|
2020 |
112 Ukraine was deprecated following a 2019 RfC, which showed overwhelming consensus for the deprecation of a slew of sources associated with Russian disinformation in Ukraine. It was pointed out later in a 2020 RfC that 112 Ukraine had not been explicitly discussed in that first discussion prior to its blacklisting request. Further discussion established a rough consensus that the source is generally unreliable, but did not form a consensus for deprecation or blacklisting. The prior blacklisting was reversed as out of process. 112 Ukraine closed in 2021. | 1 2
|
| ABC News (United States) | 
|
1 2 |
2021 |
There is consensus that ABC News, the news division of the American Broadcasting Company, is generally reliable. It is not to be confused with other publications of the same name. | 1 2
|
| Academic repositories WP:ACADREP 📌 WP:ACADEMIA.EDU 📌 WP:RGATE 📌 WP:ZENODO 📌 |
|
16[a] |
2024 |
General repositories like Academia.edu, HAL Open Archives, ResearchGate, Semantic Scholar, and Zenodo host academic papers, conference proceedings, book chapters, preprints, technical reports, etc. No filters exist for quality, and will host several unreviewed preprints, retracted papers not marked as such, unreviewed manuscripts, and even papers from predatory journals. Determine the original source of what is being cited to establish reliability. When possible, cite the original source in preference to the repository. | 1 2 3
|
| Ad Fontes Media WP:ADFONTES 📌 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
2021 |
There is consensus that Ad Fontes Media and their Media Bias Chart should not be used in article space in reference to sources' political leaning or reliability. Editors consider it a self-published source and have questioned its methodology. | 1
|
| Advameg (City-Data) |
|
2019 2019 2019
+14[b] |
2019 |
Advameg operates content farms, including City-Data, that use scraped or improperly licensed content. These sites frequently republish content from Gale's encyclopedias; many editors can obtain access to Gale through The Wikipedia Library free of charge. Advameg's sites are on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used. WP:COPYLINK prohibits linking to copyright violations. | 1 2 +43
|
| The Age |
|
2021
|
2021 |
The Age is a newspaper based in Melbourne, Australia. There is consensus that it is generally reliable. | 1
|
| Agence France-Presse (AFP) |
|
1 2 3 |
2021 |
Agence France-Presse is a news agency. There is consensus that Agence France-Presse is generally reliable. Syndicated reports from Agence France-Presse that are published in other sources are also considered generally reliable. | 1
|
| Al Jazeera WP:ALJAZEERA 📌 |
|
+13[c] | 
2024 |
Al Jazeera is a Qatari state-funded news organization that is considered generally reliable. Editors perceive Al Jazeera English to be more reliable than Al Jazeera Arabic. Some editors say that Al Jazeera, particularly Al Jazeera Arabic, is a partisan source on the Arab–Israeli conflict and on topics for which the Qatari government has a conflict of interest. Al Jazeera's live blogs should be treated with caution, per the policy on news blogs. Note that the domain name "aljazeera.com" only started hosting Al Jazeera English content in 2011; links to aljazeera.com prior to 2011 pointed to the unaffiliated Al Jazeera Magazine. | 1 2
|
| Al Mayadeen WP:ALMAYADEEN 📌 |
|
2023
|
2023 |
Al Mayadeen is a Lebanese pan-Arabist news channel. It was deprecated in a 2023 RFC. Some editors believe it publishes lies or misrepresents sources, some describe it as propaganda. | 1
|
| Alexa Internet |
|
2022
|
2022 |
Alexa Internet was a web traffic analysis company owned by Amazon and discontinued as of May 2022. There is no consensus on the reliability of Alexa Internet's website rankings. According to Alexa Internet, rankings of low-traffic websites are less reliable than rankings of high-traffic websites, and rankings of 100,000 and above are unreliable. A March 2022 RfC found no consensus on whether citations of Alexa Internet should be removed now that the service is defunct. Due to their instability, Alexa rankings should be excluded from infoboxes. | 1
|
| AllSides WP:ALLSIDES 📌 |
|
2022
|
2023 |
In a 2022 RfC, editors found no consensus on the reliability of AllSides as a whole. A significant minority of users noted that AllSides has been referenced in reliable sources as an accurate source for media bias ratings, while another significant minority argued that its methodology, which is partly based on the opinions of users, makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia. There is general consensus that reliability varies among the website's articles and should be determined on a case-by-case basis; while the high-confidence ratings are generally reliable as they are reviewed carefully by experts, others depend on blind user surveys that some editors consider opinionated and less reliable. | 1
|
| AlterNet |
|
1 2 3 4 5 |
2019 |
There is consensus that AlterNet is generally unreliable. Editors consider AlterNet a partisan source, and its statements should be attributed. AlterNet's syndicated content should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher, and the citation should preferably point to the original publisher. | 1
|
| Amazon WP:RSPAMAZON 📌 |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2021 |
User reviews on Amazon are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all.
Amazon is a reliable source for basic information about a work (such as release date, ISBN, etc.), although it is unnecessary to cite Amazon when the work itself may serve as a source for that information (e.g., authors' names and ISBNs). Future release dates may be unreliable. |
|
| Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG, Global Research, globalresearch.ca) |
|
2019
|
2019 |
Due to persistent abuse, Global Research is on the Wikipedia spam blacklist, and links must be whitelisted before they can be used. The Centre for Research on Globalisation is the organization that operates the Global Research website (globalresearch.ca, not to be confused with GlobalSecurity.org). The CRG is considered generally unreliable due to its propagation of conspiracy theories and lack of editorial oversight. It is biased or opinionated, and its content is likely to constitute undue weight. As it often covers fringe material, parity of sources should be considered. | 1 2 3
|
| The American Conservative (TAC) |
|
2019 2020 2021
|
2023 |
The American Conservative is published by the American Ideas Institute, an advocacy organisation. It is a self-identified opinionated source whose factual accuracy was questioned and many editors say that The American Conservative should not be used as a source for facts. There is consensus that opinions sourced to it must always be accompanied with in-text attribution. | 1
|
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).