User:2k415/Youth activism/Rbf2019 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) 2k415, Youth Activism
• Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, but not clearly. Could be specified a little more clearly.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It's concise

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? I think that the use of countries to show major youth movements is interesting. I felt like they weren't detailed enough or specific enough to those countries to be using it as examples of youth activism. If in all the countries the youth is using twitter to express their satisfaction then what makes them different than one another?
• Is the content added up-to-date? yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Only questioning the way they formatted it by adding different countries

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I feel like with this topic there isn't two sides to a story
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes it seems as if all content is backed up by a reliable source. I only see about two primary sources
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
• Are the sources current? yes, most seem to be from 2018 onward with a few handful of articles that are from the early 2000s.
• Check a few links. Do they work? yes, not all of them however had links to the sources.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? not many
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes, but like mentioned before I feel like the section with the added countries is a little weak

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? sure there could be more pictures added
• Are images well-captioned? yes
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? yes
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? yes, it would be Nice to see more pictures especially with the incidents of youth activism they described

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? yes
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?yes
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? yes
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? I don't believe it does

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? This is a really good article and I think they expanded really well on it!! Could probably use a couple of edits and adding more pictures but its good!
• What are the strengths of the content added? They added a lot of information and made it clear and concise
• How can the content added be improved? The formatting and the way they presented these examples of youth activism may have not been the best choice but all the information is there which is important part for a rough draft!