User:2BeCurt/sandbox
 | This is a user sandbox of 2BeCurt. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
This is my sandbox. This page is where I will figure out how to edit Wikipedia. I will also practice here.
I'm trying to figure out if Visual Editing is better than Source Editing. It isn't very clear.
It is a matter of preference.
Article critique:
The Wikipedia article "Bank Julius Baer v. WikiLeaks"
- Well-written
- Some of the references are not available. When the link is clicked, the resulting webpage no longer has the required information.
- Horribly out of date (Most recent references used were from 2008.)
- Article seems unbiased
- References 1, 5, 8 and 18 seem to be unavailable
- Five references are from WikiLeaks, the defendant in this case.
- No irrelevant information
- No blatant plagiarism or close plagiarism to be found
The Wikipedia Article I have assigned myself is of the Nintendo DS game Dragon Ball Kai: Ultimate Butoden
Reference comes from www.kanzenshuu.com, which specializes in Dragon Ball related content, such as the Dragon Ball animes, Dragon Ball Video Games, and any Dragon Ball manga. Thus it can be considered reliable.
Article is a stub. Character roster just leads to list of DB Characters instead of an actual list.
Update: Just put in my contribution. A reference, a character list, hyperlinks and a couple of sentences.
I contributed to this article because I a a huge Dragon Ball fan and it was fun to actually contribute to something I enjoy. Plus, the article was a stub and the character roster listed was not a roster, nor was it a list. I felt I could do something, mostly because I had a picture of the roster and could recognize each and every character in each transformation. I'm a nerd.