User:108.30.253.100/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article
[edit]This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (Warner Brother Studios)
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
- I am big fan of film making and my dream is to become an actor.
Lead
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
Lead evaluation
[edit]- The Lead includes an introductory sentence that is very concise and easy to understand.
- The Lead does not include a brief description pertaining to the article.
- No the Lead has information that the rest of the article touches upon.
- the Lead is very concise and straight to the point.
Content
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Content evaluation
[edit]- The article content pertains to the topic because it gives you detailed information from Warner Bros inception to the current day.
- the content of the article is up to date.
- No all content seems to belong and is written in great detail.
Tone and Balance
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? yes the article speaks the facts
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]- yes the article speaks the facts.
- I didn't see any biased facts it seemed to be more of factual content.
- the content and viewpoints are very detailed and at times overly represented .
- The article seems to attempt to persuade the reader in favor because it brings up facts that happened around wars.
Sources and References
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Are the sources current?
- Check a few links. Do they work?
Sources and references evaluation
[edit]- yes the article seems to be backed by ton of reliable information.
-yes the sources are very thorough.
- Yes the sources are current.
- The Links that were provided work and seem to be very current.
Organization
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
Organization evaluation
[edit]-the article is well written and concise.
- the article seems to have little grammatical and spelling errors.
- the article is well organized and the article breaks down different times into sections.
Images and Media
[edit]- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
[edit]-The article has a ton of images relating to the topic at hand.
- yes the images are well captioned and very detailed.
- yes
- yes the images are very visually artistic and appealing and very original.
Checking the talk page
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
Talk page evaluation
[edit]- there is a conversation going on about the actual title of Warner bros.
- yes
Overall impressions
[edit]- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- What are the article's strengths?
- How can the article be improved?
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
Overall evaluation
[edit]- The articles overall status is to explain what Warner Bros and how it originated.
- The article gives a lot of information of the history of Warner Bros and how it came to be.
- It could be shortened- the article is well developed and written to well developed and written actually.
Optional activity
[edit]- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: