User:とある白い猫/Adminship survey summary
 |
Feel free to join the discussion on the future of Requests for adminship process at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Reform. Everyone's comments are welcome! |
Admin actions
[edit]Actions per admin
[edit]
Blocks/unblocks per day
[edit]
Deletes/restores per day
[edit]
Protect/unprotect per day
[edit]
En admin vs user growth
[edit]- Source: User:NoSeptember/admin graphs
En admin vs article growth
[edit]- Source: User:NoSeptember/admin graphs
RfA rates
[edit]Success Rate RfA - 2006
[edit]
Votes Per RfA - 2006
[edit]
Average Edit Countat - RfA-2006
[edit]
En admin growth
[edit]- Source: User:NoSeptember/Admin stats
Requests for Adminship (RfA)
[edit]- Source: A summary of Wikipedia:Adminship survey as of 6 Apr 2007 18:17 (UTC)
Existing administrators
[edit]- Source: A summary of Wikipedia:Adminship survey as of 6 Apr 2007 18:17 (UTC)
Miscellaneous
[edit]- (06/23/03) I agree with trial adminship in principle
- Yes
- No
- Other
- (11/06/23/03/02) Adminship recall should be extended to all admins
- Agree
- Agree, but only with sufficient suffrage level to keep the trolls out
- Disagree
- Other
- Comment/Question
- (29/03/09) IRC should not be used in making admin decisions
- Agree
- Disagree
- Other
- (19/05/07) Admins should be sanctioned on-wiki for their incivility/attacks on IRC
- Agree
- Disagree
- Other
- (06/11/02/05/05) The community should have direct say in IRC operator/Oversight/CheckUser access
- Agree
- Agree to IRC, disagree to oversight/checkuser
- Agree to oversight/checkuser, disagree to IRC
- Disagree
- Other
- (06/11/04) This poll has too many questions
- Agree
- Disagree
- Other