United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.
 | This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (October 2012) |
| United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 2, 1983 Decided June 30, 1983 | |
| Full case name | United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc. |
| Docket no. | 81-1032 |
| Citations | 463 U.S. 418 (more) 103 S. Ct. 3133; 77 L. Ed. 2d 743 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Holding | |
| Attorneys in the Civil Division of the Justice Department and their assistants and staff may not obtain automatic (A)(i) disclosure of grand jury materials for use in a civil suit, but must instead seek a (C)(i) court order for access to such materials. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens |
| Dissent | Burger, joined by Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court) | |
United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether United States Department of Justice Civil Division attorneys were required to show particularized need in order to obtain disclosure.
Opinion of the Court
[edit]In an opinion delivered by Justice Brennan, the Court decided in favor of Sells Engineering.
External links
[edit]- Text of United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418 (1983) is available from: Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |