United States v. Johnson (1946)

For other uses, see United States v. Johnson.

United States v. Johnson
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued January 2, 1946 Decided February 4, 1946
Full case name	United States v. Johnson; United States v. Sommers et al.
Citations	327 U.S. 106 (more) 66 S. Ct. 464; 90 L. Ed. 562; 46-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) ¶ 9155; 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 14; 1946-1 C.B. 122
Case history
Prior	149 F.2d 31 (7th Cir. 1945); cert. granted, 326 U.S. 702 (1945).
Subsequent	Rehearing denied, 327 U.S. 817 (1946).
Court membership
Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone Associate Justices Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas Frank Murphy · Robert H. Jackson Wiley B. Rutledge · Harold H. Burton
Case opinion
Majority	Black, joined by Stone, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Rutledge, Burton
Jackson and Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case.

Procedural background

The case was decided alongside United States v. Sommers et al. Respondents in both cases were convicted of violations of penal provisions of the Revenue Acts and for conspiracy. The Seventh Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court reversed and remanded to the circuit court of appeals. That court remanded the case to the district court to permit a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. That motion was made and denied. The circuit court of appeals affirmed. Respondents petitioned this Court for certiorari, but the petition was dismissed on motion of their counsel.

After obtaining a second remand from the circuit court of appeals on the ground of still further newly discovered evidence, respondents filed in the district court an amended motion for a new trial. That motion was denied. The circuit court of appeals reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Petitioners contended that their convictions were improper because they were based on perjured testimony.

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court agreed, holding that the district court properly found that there was no prejudiced testimony. According to the Court, the appellate court improperly substituted its own finding that the challenged witness's original testimony was unerringly false and that the trial court's contrary conclusion amounted to an abuse of discretion. The court concluded that no reviewable issue of law was presented and that the appeal should have been dismissed as frivolous.

External links

• Text of United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106 (1946) is available from: Justia Library of Congress