Jump to content

United States v. Davila

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

United States v. Davila
Argued April 15, 2013
Decided June 13, 2013
Full case nameUnited States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila
Docket no.12-167
Citations569 U.S. 597 (more)
133 S. Ct. 2139; 186 L. Ed. 2d 139; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4541; 81 U.S.L.W. 4394
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
Prior664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011)
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityGinsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan
ConcurrenceScalia, joined by Thomas

United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1]

Notes

[edit]

References

[edit]
  • United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013).
  • Supreme Court of the United States (August 2012). "Docket for United States v. Davila". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • United States Department of Justice (December 2012). "Reply Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • American Bar Association (March 2013). "Amicus Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • United States v. Davila, 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011).
[edit]