Jump to content

United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.
Decided June 1, 2023
Full case nameUnited States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.
Docket no.21-1326
Citations598 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
The False Claims Act's scienter element, which requires a defendant to "knowingly" give a "false" claim to the government, refers to a defendant’s knowledge and subjective beliefs. It does not refer to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
False Claims Act

United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc., 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the False Claims Act's scienter element, which requires a defendant to "knowingly" give a "false" claim to the government, refers to a defendant's knowledge and subjective beliefs. It does not refer to what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed.[1][2]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc., No. 21-1326, 598 U.S. ___ (2023).
  2. ^ "Supreme Court maintains focus on defendant's subjective beliefs in False Claims Act cases". SCOTUSblog. 2023-06-01. Retrieved 2024-11-02.
[edit]
  • Text of United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc., No. 21-1326, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)