Thorson's rule

Thorson's rule (named after Gunnar Thorson by S. A. Mileikovsky in 1971) ^[1] is an ecogeographical rule which states that benthic marine invertebrates at low latitudes tend to produce large numbers of eggs developing to pelagic (often planktotrophic [plankton-feeding]) and widely dispersing larvae, whereas at high latitudes such organisms tend to produce fewer and larger lecithotrophic (yolk-feeding) eggs and larger offspring, often by viviparity or ovoviviparity, which are often brooded.^[2]

Groups involved

The rule was originally established for marine bottom invertebrates, but it also applies to a group of parasitic flatworms, monogenean ectoparasites on the gills of marine fish.^[3] Most low-latitude species of Monogenea produce large numbers of ciliated larvae. However, at high latitudes, species of the entirely viviparous family Gyrodactylidae, which produce few nonciliated offspring and are very rare at low latitudes, represent the majority of gill Monogenea, i.e., about 80–90% of all species at high northern latitudes, and about one third of all species in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic waters, against less than 1% in tropical waters. Data compiled by A.V. Gusev in 1978 indicates that Gyrodactylidae may also be more common in cold than tropical freshwater systems, suggesting that Thorson's rule may apply to freshwater invertebrates.^[4]

There are exceptions to the rule, such as ascoglossan snails: tropical ascoglossans have a higher incidence of lecithotrophy and direct development than temperate species.^[5] A study in 2001 indicated that two factors are important for Thorson's rule to be valid for marine gastropods: 1) the habitat must include rocky substrates, because soft-bottom habitats appear to favour non-pelagic development; and 2) a diverse assemblage of taxa need to be compared to avoid the problem of phyletic constraints, which could limit the evolution of different developmental modes.^[6]

Application to deep-sea species

The temperature gradient from warm surface waters to the deep sea is similar to that along latitudinal gradients. A gradient as described by Thorson's rule may therefore be expected. However, evidence for such a gradient is ambiguous;^[1] Gyrodactylidae have not yet been found in the deep sea.^[3]

Explanations

Several explanations of the rule have been given. They include:

Because of the reduced speed of development at low temperatures, most species cannot complete development during the short time of phytoplankton bloom, on which planktotrophic species depend;
Most species cannot synchronize hatching with the phytoplankton bloom;
Slower development increases the risk of predation on pelagic larvae;
Non-pelagic larvae can settle close to the parent, i.e. in a favourable environment;
Small pelagic larvae may have osmotic difficulties in Arctic and Antarctic summers, due to the melting ice;
Small larvae may not be able to survive at very low temperatures;
Cold temperature may select for large size at the beginning of development, resulting in non-pelagic larvae; and
In cold waters it is more difficult to precipitate dissolved calcium, which results in reduced body size of animals supported by calcium skeletons, leading to viviparity.

Most of these explanations can be excluded for the Monogenea, whose larvae are never planktotrophic (therefore eliminating explanations 1 and 2), their larvae are always short-lived (3), Gyrodactylidae are most common not only close to melting ice but in cold seas generally (5). Explanation 6 is unlikely, because small organisms are common in cold seas, Gyrodactylidae are among the smallest Monogenea (7), and Monogenea do not possess calcareous skeletons (8). The conclusion is that the most likely explanation for the Monogenea (and by implication for other groups) is that small larvae cannot locate suitable habitats at low temperatures, where physiological including sensory processes are slowed, and/or that low temperatures prevent the production of sufficient numbers of pelagic larvae, which would be necessary to find suitable habitats in the vast oceanic spaces.^[3]

Implications for Rapoport's rule

Rapoport's rule states that latitudinal ranges of species are generally smaller at low than at high latitudes. Thorson's rule contradicts this rule, because species disperse more widely at low than at high latitudes, supplementing much evidence against the generality of Rapoport's rule and for the fact that tropical species often have wider geographical ranges than high latitude species.^[7]^[8]

References

^ ^a ^b Mileikovsky, S. A. (August 1971). "Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a re-evaluation". Marine Biology. 10 (3): 193–213. Bibcode:1971MarBi..10..193M. doi:10.1007/BF00352809. ISSN 0025-3162.
^ Thorson, Gunnar (December 1957). "Chapter 17: Bottom Communities (Sublittoral or Shallow Shelf)". 67V1. Geological Society of America Memoirs. Vol. 67V1. Geological Society of America. pp. 461–534. doi:10.1130/mem67v1-p461.
^ ^a ^b ^c Rohde, K. (August 1985). "Increased viviparity of marine parasites at high latitudes". Hydrobiologia. 127 (3): 197–201. Bibcode:1985HyBio.127..197R. doi:10.1007/BF00024224. ISSN 0018-8158.
^ Gussev, A. V.; Fernando, C. H. (1984). Fernando, C. H. (ed.). Monogenea from freshwater fishes. Vol. 57. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 149–153. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6545-4_7. ISBN 978-94-009-6547-8.
^ Krug, P. J. (1998-10-29). "Poecilogony in an estuarine opisthobranch: planktotrophy, lecithotrophy, and mixed clutches in a population of the ascoglossan Alderia modesta". Marine Biology. 132 (3): 483–494. Bibcode:1998MarBi.132..483K. doi:10.1007/s002270050414. ISSN 0025-3162.
^ Gallardo, C. S.; Penchaszadeh, P. E. (2001-03-19). "Hatching mode and latitude in marine gastropods: revisiting Thorson's paradigm in the southern hemisphere". Marine Biology. 138 (3): 547–552. Bibcode:2001MarBi.138..547G. doi:10.1007/s002270000477. ISSN 0025-3162.
^ Rohde, Klaus; Heap, Maureen; Heap, David (July 1993). "Rapoport's Rule Does Not Apply to Marine Teleosts and Cannot Explain Latitudinal Gradients in Species Richness". The American Naturalist. 142 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1086/285526. ISSN 0003-0147.
^ Rohde, Klaus (December 1999). "Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport's rule revisited: a review of recent work and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients?". Ecography. 22 (6): 593–613. Bibcode:1999Ecogr..22..593R. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00509.x. ISSN 0906-7590.

Sources

Aenaud, P.M. 1977. "Adaptations within the Antarctic marine benthic ecosystem. In: Adaptations within Antarctic ecosystems". Proceedings 3rd SCAR Symposium Antarctic Biology (Ed. Llana, G.), pp. 135–157.
Jablonski, D. and Lutz, R.A. 1983. "Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: Palaeobiological implications". Biological Reviews 58: 21–89.
Laptikhovsky, V. 2006. "Latitudinal and bathymetric trends in egg size variation: a new look at Thorson's and Rass's rules". Marine Ecology 27: 7–14.
Pearse, J.S. 1994. "Cold-water echinoderms break 'Thorson's rule'". In: Reproduction, larval biology, and recruitment in deep-sea benthos ( Ed.Ecklebarger, K.J, Young, C.M.) pp 26–43. Columbia University Press, New York.
Picken, G.B. 1980. "Reproductive adaptations in Antarctic invertebrates". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 14: 67–75.
Rohde, K. 2002. "Ecology and biogeography of marine parasites". Advances in Marine Biology 43: 1–86.
Rohde, K. 2005. "Latitudinal. Longitudinal and depth gradients". In: Marine Parasitology (Ed. K. Rohde) pp. 348–351. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne and CABI, Wallingford, Oxon.
Simpson, R.D. 1900. "The reproduction of some littoral molluscs from Macquarie Island (Sub-Antarctic)". Marine Biology 44: 125–142.
Stanwell-Smith, D., Peck, L.S. Clarke, A., Murray, A.W.A. and Todd, C.D. 1999. "The distribution, abundance and seasonality of pelagic marine invertebrate larvae in the maritime Antarctic". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 354: 471–484.

[Mileikovsky-1] Mileikovsky, S. A. (August 1971). "Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a re-evaluation". Marine Biology. 10 (3): 193–213. Bibcode:1971MarBi..10..193M. doi:10.1007/BF00352809. ISSN 0025-3162.

[Thorson-2] Thorson, Gunnar (December 1957). "Chapter 17: Bottom Communities (Sublittoral or Shallow Shelf)". 67V1. Geological Society of America Memoirs. Vol. 67V1. Geological Society of America. pp. 461–534. doi:10.1130/mem67v1-p461.

[Rohde-3] Rohde, K. (August 1985). "Increased viviparity of marine parasites at high latitudes". Hydrobiologia. 127 (3): 197–201. Bibcode:1985HyBio.127..197R. doi:10.1007/BF00024224. ISSN 0018-8158.

[Gusev-4] Gussev, A. V.; Fernando, C. H. (1984). Fernando, C. H. (ed.). Monogenea from freshwater fishes. Vol. 57. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 149–153. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6545-4_7. ISBN 978-94-009-6547-8.

[Krug-5] Krug, P. J. (1998-10-29). "Poecilogony in an estuarine opisthobranch: planktotrophy, lecithotrophy, and mixed clutches in a population of the ascoglossan Alderia modesta". Marine Biology. 132 (3): 483–494. Bibcode:1998MarBi.132..483K. doi:10.1007/s002270050414. ISSN 0025-3162.

[Gallardo-6] Gallardo, C. S.; Penchaszadeh, P. E. (2001-03-19). "Hatching mode and latitude in marine gastropods: revisiting Thorson's paradigm in the southern hemisphere". Marine Biology. 138 (3): 547–552. Bibcode:2001MarBi.138..547G. doi:10.1007/s002270000477. ISSN 0025-3162.

[Rohde2-7] Rohde, Klaus; Heap, Maureen; Heap, David (July 1993). "Rapoport's Rule Does Not Apply to Marine Teleosts and Cannot Explain Latitudinal Gradients in Species Richness". The American Naturalist. 142 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1086/285526. ISSN 0003-0147.

[Rohde3-8] Rohde, Klaus (December 1999). "Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport's rule revisited: a review of recent work and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients?". Ecography. 22 (6): 593–613. Bibcode:1999Ecogr..22..593R. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00509.x. ISSN 0906-7590.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

v t e Biological rules
Rules	Allen's rule Shorter appendages in colder climates Bateson's rule Extra limbs mirror their neighbours Bergmann's rule Larger bodies in colder climates Cope's rule Bodies get larger over time Deep-sea gigantism Larger bodies in deep-sea animals Dollo's law Loss of complex traits is irreversible Eichler's rule Parasites co-vary with their hosts Emery's rule Insect social parasites are often in same genus as their hosts Fahrenholz's rule Host and parasite phylogenies become congruent Foster's rule (Insular gigantism, Insular dwarfism) Small species get larger, large species smaller, after colonizing islands Gause's law Complete competitors cannot coexist Gloger's rule Lighter coloration in colder, drier climates Haldane's rule Hybrid sexes that are absent, rare, or sterile, are heterogamic Harrison's rule Parasites co-vary in size with their hosts Hamilton's rule Genes increase in frequency when relatedness of recipient to actor times benefit to recipient exceeds reproductive cost to actor Kleiber's law An animals metabolic rate decreases with its size Hennig's progression rule In cladistics, the most primitive species are found in earliest, central, part of group's area Jarman–Bell principle The correlation between the size of an animal and its diet quality; larger animals can consume lower quality diet Jordan's rule Inverse relationship between water temperature and no. of fin rays, vertebrae Lack's principle Birds lay only as many eggs as they can provide food for Rapoport's rule Latitudinal range increases with latitude Rensch's rule Sexual size dimorphism increases with size when males are larger, decreases with size when females are larger Rosa's rule Groups evolve from character variation in primitive species to a fixed character state in advanced ones Schmalhausen's law A population at limit of tolerance in one aspect is vulnerable to small differences in any other aspect Thayer's law The top of an animals coloration is darker than the bottom Thorson's rule No. of eggs of benthic marine invertebrates decreases with latitude Van Valen's law Probability of extinction of a group is constant over time von Baer's laws Embryos start from a common form and develop into increasingly specialised forms Williston's law Parts in an organism become reduced in number and specialized in function
Related	Countergradient variation Where genetics opposes environment as a factor Gigantothermy Large ectothermic animals more easily maintain constant body temperature

v t e Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Trophic components
General	Abiotic component Abiotic stress Behaviour Biogeochemical cycle Biomass Biotic component Biotic stress Carrying capacity Competition Ecosystem Ecosystem ecology Ecosystem model Green world hypothesis Keystone species List of feeding behaviours Metabolic theory of ecology Productivity Resource Restoration
Producers	Autotrophs Chemosynthesis Chemotrophs Foundation species Kinetotrophs Mixotrophs Myco-heterotrophy Mycotroph Organotrophs Photoheterotrophs Photosynthesis Photosynthetic efficiency Phototrophs Primary nutritional groups Primary production
Consumers	Apex predator Bacterivore Carnivores Chemoorganotroph Foraging Generalist and specialist species Intraguild predation Herbivores Heterotroph Heterotrophic nutrition Insectivore Mesopredators Mesopredator release hypothesis Omnivores Optimal foraging theory Planktivore Predation Prey switching
Decomposers	Chemoorganoheterotrophy Decomposition Detritivores Detritus
Microorganisms	Archaea Bacteriophage Lithoautotroph Lithotrophy Marine Microbial cooperation Microbial ecology Microbial food web Microbial intelligence Microbial loop Microbial mat Microbial metabolism Phage ecology
Food webs	Biomagnification Ecological efficiency Ecological pyramid Energy flow Food chain Trophic level
Example webs	Lakes Rivers Soil Tritrophic interactions in plant defense Marine food webs cold seeps hydrothermal vents intertidal kelp forests North Pacific Gyre San Francisco Estuary tide pool
Processes	Ascendency Bioaccumulation Cascade effect Climax community Competitive exclusion principle Consumer–resource interactions Copiotrophs Dominance Ecological network Ecological succession Energy quality Energy systems language f-ratio Feed conversion ratio Feeding frenzy Mesotrophic soil Nutrient cycle Oligotroph Paradox of the plankton Trophic cascade Trophic mutualism Trophic state index
Defense, counter	Animal coloration Anti-predator adaptations Camouflage Deimatic behaviour Herbivore adaptations to plant defense Mimicry Plant defense against herbivory Predator avoidance in schooling fish

v t e Ecology: Modelling ecosystems: Other components
Population ecology	Abundance Allee effect Consumer-resource model Depensation Ecological yield Effective population size Intraspecific competition Logistic function Malthusian growth model Maximum sustainable yield Overpopulation Overexploitation Population cycle Population dynamics Population modeling Population size Predator–prey (Lotka–Volterra) equations Recruitment Small population size Stability Resilience Resistance Random generalized Lotka–Volterra model
Species	Biodiversity Density-dependent inhibition Ecological effects of biodiversity Ecological extinction Endemic species Flagship species Gradient analysis Indicator species Introduced species Invasive species / Native species Latitudinal gradients in species diversity Minimum viable population Neutral theory Occupancy–abundance relationship Population viability analysis Priority effect Rapoport's rule Relative abundance distribution Relative species abundance Species diversity Species homogeneity Species richness Species distribution Species–area curve Umbrella species
Species interaction	Antibiosis Biological interaction Commensalism Community ecology Ecological facilitation Interspecific competition Mutualism Parasitism Storage effect Symbiosis
Spatial ecology	Biogeography Cross-boundary subsidy Ecocline Ecotone Ecotype Disturbance Edge effects Foster's rule Habitat fragmentation Ideal free distribution Intermediate disturbance hypothesis Insular biogeography Land change modeling Landscape ecology Landscape epidemiology Landscape limnology Metapopulation Patch dynamics r/K selection theory Resource selection function Source–sink dynamics
Niche	Ecological niche Ecological trap Ecosystem engineer Environmental niche modelling Guild Habitat marine habitats Limiting similarity Niche apportionment models Niche construction Niche differentiation Ontogenetic niche shift
Other networks	Assembly rules Bateman's principle Bioluminescence Ecological collapse Ecological debt Ecological deficit Ecological energetics Ecological indicator Ecological threshold Ecosystem diversity Emergence Extinction debt Kleiber's law Liebig's law of the minimum Marginal value theorem Thorson's rule Xerosere
Other	Allometry Alternative stable state Balance of nature Biological data visualization Ecological economics Ecological footprint Ecological forecasting Ecological humanities Ecological stoichiometry Ecopath Ecosystem based fisheries Endolith Evolutionary ecology Functional ecology Industrial ecology Macroecology Microecosystem Natural environment Regime shift Sexecology Systems ecology Urban ecology Theoretical ecology
Outline of ecology