Template talk:World Trade Center sidebar

130 Liberty Street

I've changed the title of "Tower 5" to "130 Liberty Street (Tower 5)", even though World Trade Center Tower 5 is the official article name. I don't see why it shouldn't have its future address and likely future official name listed here per the other WTC buildings, where there is absolutely no chance of confusion with the Deutsche Bank Building since (Tower 5) is specified. Rai-me 16:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New?

There is no new world trade center. There's only a planned new world trade center, and in architecture that's a big difference. I'm correcting the template. Superm401 - Talk 13:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Heights?

I don't think the listing of heights is necessary. It is making the template very wide. Heights are listed on the individual building articles, but they don't really need to be listed in the template. Rai-me 13:24, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to be bold and remove them, as no seems to have any opposition towards it. Heights are informative content that are really not needed in a navigation template. Cheers, Rai-me 02:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slight error in colors

7 World Trade Centre's line is the light blue color, it should be white. I can't fix it due to protection. Just to let you know. :) vıdıoman (talk • contribs) 00:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility problem

This is a layout table not a data table, so it should have no header elements. This change is under the hood. —surueña 09:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done —surueña 21:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated to July 2008

The relocation of The Drawing Center to the WTC was withdrawn in 2005.

The proposed International Freedom Center was canceled in 2005.

The official name for the memorial is the World Trade Center Memorial. The name Reflecting Absence refers to the winning submission to a design competition held in 2003. patsw (talk) 01:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: template moved per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:25, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Planned World Trade Center → Template:World Trade Center sidebar – Considering that 1, 3, 4 and 7 WTC are complete, as well as Liberty Park, the WTC Hub and the 9/11 Memorial-Museum, it is inaccurate to have the template title include "planned" since the site is already constructed (with the exception of 2 WTC and other structures). I propose using "sidebar" to disambiguate from the other World Trade Center template. CookieMonster755 ✉ 02:40, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. "Planned" is outdated. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 17:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Refocus template

I propose reframing this template from the rebuilding of the WTC to the WTC itself, past and present. There is a need for such a template, as evidenced by the fact that the current one is used simply on any NYC WTC article. Also, the lead article on "rebuilding" does not actually exist. It redirects to the Ground Zero article. Ergo Sum 15:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ergo Sum 21:58, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]