Template talk:Werner Erhard
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Werner Erhard template. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Notice re Checkuser case
[edit]A checkuser case resulted in "confirm" on several users as sockpuppets of each other, that edited articles on closely related topics including Landmark Education, Werner Erhard, Landmark Education litigation, Scientology and Werner Erhard, Erhard Seminars Training, and Werner Erhard and Associates, among others. As a result, several of these users and sockpuppets of each other have been blocked. The checkuser case page is here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eastbayway. Cirt (talk)
Why is a few books missing, that are all in a positive light, while almost all the books reviews are negatively slanted.
[edit]Why is this book not cited? included? Reviewed? Is because its positive? Is it because it shows the reality of the deceptive tactics used by media such as the SJMN, CBS, and Wikipedia, and its Wikipedians?
"60 Minutes And The Assassination of Werner Erhard: How America's top rated television show was used in an attempt to destroy a man who was making a difference."
I would just like to know if you really practice WK:NPOV or is it just a buzzword?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view
https://www.amazon.com/Minutes-Assassination-Werner-Erhard-television-ebook/dp/B00QMLWYSC?ref_=ast_author_dp JBTurner44 (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)