Template talk:Usul al-Fiqh

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles

Islam

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles

Ahkam

The Ahkam section needs to be changed - those five levels are disputed amongst the sunni madhahib, I think a note should be made about this. For example, the Hanafis differentiate between Wajib and Fard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salleyye (talk • contribs) 03:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to fix it. --Striver 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Position of Ijma

Shouldn't Ijma rate just below--or, IMHO--above Ijtihad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IFaqeer (talk • contribs) 20:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

No comment. Be bold. --Striver 00:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very bad template

I just noticed this template -- it is extremely badly done. It is too long and detailed and since most of the terms are transliterated Arabic terms that would be unfamiliar to non-Muslims (and to many uneducated Muslims) it is close to useless. What the heck does the average English speaking reader make of Usul al-fiqh? An exotic Syrian delicacy involving figs?

I removed it from the mullah article, where it was longer than the article and completely unbalanced the formatting. If you want to use this template, it needs to be drastically revised. Zora 09:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For people who have read up a bit on basic Islamic studies, these terms all have meanings which are obvious. Some things on Wikipedia are more technical, and Islam has a lot of technical language. DivineReality (talk) 22:51, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scholarly titles section

The ordering of the scholarly titles at the bototm of this box seems arbitrary. Not sure which is the best ordering. Probably I would recommend English alphabetical. ZaydHammoudeh 02:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English Wiki so yes, order by the English alphabet RooZ 01:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Positioning of Ahkam

Shouldnt Wajib be higher up on the list than Halal? 83.218.150.38 (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed incorrect line

I removed a line that was added on incorrectly "*love (husband and wife)" that did not seem to be a title, it only linked to english word love. --Dishcmds (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]