Template talk:User please be nice
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I had this template on my page originally, but I removed it because it says "this user does not understand mean people". Doesn't being nice encompass understanding why people are mean sometimes? :) Ashibaka tock 02:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Colour Change
[edit]Hi
I got wrapped on the knuckles because I didn't open a discussion about a proposed colour change for this user box. I understand that this change will affect everyone who uses this userbox.
So, I would like to propose a colour change from the current faded pink, to a more suitable set. I propose to use: [1]
Symbol background: hex colour #CC00FF
User box background: hex colour #E066FF
Both of these colours are shades of purple, and I have chosen these to reflect the "peaceful" nature. I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly associate purple with peace. Second, I wanted the user boxes to stand out, not all look so similar. I had a lot of faded pink userboxes and just wanted to review the use of colours, in particular this one.
Comments please? can a consensus be reached? all those in favour of a colour change, please say so now. Many thanks, δ²(Talk) 04:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi there, thanks for opening discussion and accepting the revert of your change. I appreciate that it may be construed as 'minor' since it's only a colour change, although I disagree with being WP:BOLD on this one since it will affect numerous editors and their associated userspace. As to a 'wrap on the knuckles' it really wasn't intended as such and I apologise if that's how it felt: I merely meant to remind you of the importance of consensus for wide-scale changes such as this. On the issue at hand: I agree a colour change would be helpful (though not necessary) but would far prefer something more positive (e.g. green, white, blue -> i.e. symbols of peace and harmony) than purple (which is often associated with royalty). What do you think? ColdmachineTalk 23:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2019
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace WP:CIVIL with WP:CIV. 2406:3003:2004:6A0:4082:E335:90D:1F22 (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
- Not done: Unnecessary, the two redirects point to the same page. —Nizolan (talk · c.) 12:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)