Template talk:User Iraq War

May 19th edit by Cyde

Who's T2 and why does this template need to be saved from him/her/it? Moonshiner 06:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

db-attacktemplate

I placed db-attacktemplate on this userbox template because it's divisive. User:Cedar-Guardian removed it, "because it's on tfd)". This is not a good reason to remove the tag. --Tony Sidaway 18:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put it on there. Last warning. --Revolución (talk) 19:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you warning me about? I'm just tagging a divisive and inflamatory template. --Tony Sidaway 19:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was warning for you for your persistent vandalism regarding userbox templates. I have put up a notice about you on WP:VIP. That was not even your last warning, I warned you many times after that. --Revolución (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I have removed your notice, as it was invalid. Please read WP:VIP carefully before editing it. Thank you! --Ashenai 19:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how it was invalid. --Revolución (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VIP is for reports on registered users in the following circumstances:

Multiple sockpuppets
Complex vandalism requiring in-depth investigation
Accounts used only for vandalism that have made no edits within 72 hours

None of those conditions pertains here. also your use of the term "vandalism" to describe speedy deletion by an administrator of a template tagged by another, and verified as unsuitable for Wikipedia, is somewhat wide of the mark. --Tony Sidaway 20:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged the template, and deleted it. Stop lying. --Revolución (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had tagged it earlier, but you removed the tag. Then:

19:57, 10 February 2006 . . MarkSweep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (db)

And I deleted it. --Tony Sidaway 20:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TFD consensus of the first AND second nominations was a Strong Keep, yet the discussion was closed. The deletion of this template is not valid. --Revolución (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is it divisive? We can have both a support war and an against war userbox. I agree that deletion is invalid.--Wedian 18:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack?

How is this a personal attack? War is inflamatory. How is promoting peace bad? I think the silly notices on the userbox need to be removed at once. --Nelson Ricardo 02:53, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?

What's going on here? What was the exact text of this deleted userbox? Right now this blank template is sitting in the ideology userbox list. I'll remove it from the list unless someone adds content. GoodCop 05:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]