Template talk:USAF transports

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This template is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

C-36

The Bushranger Could you please explain why you reinstated original research in this edit? While some sources do state that the the C-36 may have been the YAL-1, I have yet to see one make a definitive claim that it was, and I've also yet to see any which state that "there is literally no other candidate for the description than the YAL-1." such a statement is purely original research and speculation. For all we know, it could have been a precursor, competitor, or maybe even an entirely unrelated classified project. As of yet, the evidence that the YAL-1 and C-36 are the same is circumstantial, and no reliable sources claim that they are. - ZLEA _T\^C 02:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because WP:COMMONSENSE - and also WP:BLUE. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how WP:COMMONSENSE or WP:BLUE apply in this case, especially since there are a number of other plausible explanations for the YFC-36 designation. No reliable sources state that the YFC-36 and YAL-1 are the same, so WP:BLUE is out the window. I've tagged the "C-36" designation as unconfirmed, but the link remains for now. - ZLEA _T\^C 13:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]