Template talk:U
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the U redirect. |
|
January 2009 request
[edit]{{editprotected}}
Hey, can I get someone to please add <noinclude>[[Category:Convenience templates]]</noinclude>? (I'm in the confusing situation of being unable to edit a template I myself wrote!) Thanks. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Interwikis
[edit]{{editprotected}}
Please add these interwikis:
[[de:Vorlage:Benutzer]] [[es:Plantilla:U]] [[ru:Template:U]]
I have only got these ones. Regards, Muro de Aguas (write me) 16:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have created the template documentation, so you could add them to there if you like. Regards, Martinmsgj 16:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Muro de Aguas (write me) 17:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Category:Username internal link templates
[edit]{{editprotected}}
Proposal: add Category:Username internal link templates. TJRC (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good, but you can make this edit yourself at the bottom of Template:U/doc. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from Benwing, 11 May 2011: merge template U with Ul
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
{{U}}
and {{Ul}}
are almost exactly equivalent, except that {{Ul}}
lets you specify an optional second parameter that is used as the anchor text in place of the actual username. I suggest we make {{U}}
work like {{Ul}}
and then redirect {{Ul}}
to {{U}}
.
{{U}}
looks currently like this:
[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]<noinclude>{{doc}}</noinclude>
It should look like:
[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{2|{{{1}}}}}}]]<noinclude>{{doc}}</noinclude>
Benwing (talk) 03:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- {{ul}} is the older template. Maybe it would be better to move that template over this one? Or even better, move it to Template:User link (clearer name) and then redirect this one there as well. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- As there was no response, I have now done this. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 27 March 2014
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add redirect categories: {{redr|from template shortcut}}
Anon126 (talk - contribs) 07:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Question: Why is there a lot of parserfunction markup above, e.g. all those
{{#if:}}
- is it necessary? --Redrose64 (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Redrose64: I was seeking to add the visible code, namely the given usage of Template:Redr, not the actual markup (By the way, that is a result of the substitution of Template:Tlx.) This applies similarly at Template talk:Ul. Anon126 (talk - contribs) 02:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Done With the full name of the template and fully protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Anon126: But
{{tlx}}
isn't supposed to be substd. Just take the template syntax that you want to show, and inserttlx|
before the template name, like this:{{redr|from template shortcut}}
--Redrose64 (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)- I usually substitute any templates in discussion messages, but after going over WP:SUBST again...
Technically, templates shall not be substituted that (a) contain calls to ParserFunctions (#if, #switch, etc.), unless, where possible, these are substituted too (see mw:Manual:Substitution#Multilevel substitution)
— WP:SUBST- ... I realize that I should drop that habit. Anon126 (talk - contribs) 22:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- @Anon126: But
- Done With the full name of the template and fully protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 18 March 2017
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
{{This is a redirect}} is deprecated and should be replaced with {{Redirect category shell}}. Please convert {{This is a redirect|from template shortcut|fully protected}} to:
{{Redirect category shell| {{R from template shortcut}} }}
It does not need "fully protected" parameter because the template checks for it - like the old one did (see the current template, it lists "Fully protected" twice). Christian75 (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Done -- John of Reading (talk) 12:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)