Template talk:Triple image
Appearance
This template was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2013. The result of the discussion was Merge to {{Multiple image}}. |
2008
[edit]Recently some changes at double and triple image have given the text an automatic wrap around. Are there any other new features? Is there a way to make the images all the same height with a simple command or parameter?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 06:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Mark template as deprecated
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template has much better equivalent - {{Multiple image}} and has only 188 transluctions. I think we should mark this with {{Tdeprecated}} for now. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 19:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit protected}}
template. As things stand, it's a wrapper for{{multiple image}}
, and has been since this edit. Judging by the TfD, there was considerable opposition to outright deletion, which is what{{tdeprecated}}
would be a step towards. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC)- That's a pure-admin action and doesn't need the community consensus. Besides, it's a deprecated redirect to thr template, which no longer exist. That's a temporary substitution to avoid mess on Wikipedia and that's why this information is necessary. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: Sorry, but we can't go against TfD results. If you want to challenge the result you'll have to ask the closing admin. Also, this template is only semi-protected, not fully protected. And it's not a redirect, it's a wrapper template, and the parent template (Template:Multiple image) still exists. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 01:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- That's a pure-admin action and doesn't need the community consensus. Besides, it's a deprecated redirect to thr template, which no longer exist. That's a temporary substitution to avoid mess on Wikipedia and that's why this information is necessary. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Codename Lisa made the edit. --Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 14:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Yes, I did it after a chat with User:Plastikspork, the closing admin, who is, by the way, the editor who committed the provided diff above. It was the best thing to do at the time. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)