Template talk:Toronto Argonauts roster

	Canada portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
	Ontario portal This template is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Toronto.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Canadian football

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles

9 week reserve

Is there any way to tell whether a player is on the 9 week reserve?--J3wishVulcan 01:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Import/Non-Import

I'd like to do away with the flags as they're not useful (also see MOS:FLAG) and actually often confusing when what's really of importance is import/non-import.

How about just using a symbol (an asterisk, for example) to mark imports (or non-imports) or abbreviations like IMP or NON? Thoughts? DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I feel like a player's status Import status is much more apparent from looking at the flag then IMP or N/I. It also gives the player's exact nationality rather than simply whether the player is Canadian or foreign. Furthermore, much confusion can be eliminated by using the flags in conjunction with + signs when a player's birthplace does not necessarily translate to his import status. --J3wishVulcan (talk) 01:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't think that makes any sense. Prefontaine's non-import status is more clear with a USA flag and a + following his position than with N/I? It is pretty standard for CFL rosters to simply mark imports (or sometimes non-imports) with an asterisk or an "I"; never with flags as it's pretty meaningless according to the import rule. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about just marking imports, then? Would that make it more apparent? DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]